Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 45 reviews
Yokohama C Drive looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Yokohama C Drive vs Yokohama C Drive2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 45 + 31 owner reviews. How we score
C Drive is ahead, 71–64
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
71
Dry
C Drive +863Why this score
Source C Drive C Drive2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 73 61 C Drive: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 73.3 = 71
C Drive2: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 61 = 63
No road tests of dry for C Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for C Drive2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
74
Wet
C Drive +767Why this score
Source C Drive C Drive2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 75 66 C Drive: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74
C Drive2: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.8 = 67
No road tests of wet for C Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for C Drive2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
72
Comfort
C Drive +468Why this score
Source C Drive C Drive2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 74 66 C Drive: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 74.3 = 72
C Drive2: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.1 = 68
No road tests of comfort for C Drive or C Drive2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
66
Treadwear
C Drive +462Why this score
Source C Drive C Drive2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 67 60 C Drive: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 66
C Drive2: 60% × 63.9 (est.) + 40% × 59.9 = 62
No road tests of treadwear for C Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for C Drive2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
72
Handling (owners)
C Drive +1161Why this score
Source C Drive C Drive2 Reviews found online 72 61
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama C Drive | Yokohama C Drive2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 64 |
| Dry | 71 | 63 |
| Wet | 74 | 67 |
| Comfort | 72 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 62 |
| Handling (owners) | 72 | 61 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
C Drive
C Drive2
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A C Drive
Pros
- Excellent wet weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Predictable, progressive handling characteristics
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life reports ranging from premature wear to high mileage
- Some users report increased noise and stiffness as the tire ages
- Mixed feedback on dry grip performance under aggressive driving conditions
Tire B C Drive2
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and vibration damping
- Low road noise levels
- Strong wet weather performance for most users
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting rapid wear
- Handling can feel vague or lack feedback for performance-oriented drivers
- Sudden loss of grip at the limit
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama C Drive | B · Yokohama C Drive2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 3 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 18″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama C Drive
Yokohama C Drive2
Winner: Yokohama C Drive — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Yokohama C Drive scores 72 vs 61 on handling.
Yokohama C Drive scores 71 vs 63 on dry.
Yokohama C Drive scores 74 vs 67 on wet.
Yokohama C Drive scores 72 vs 68 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
C Drive or C Drive2?
Which is better in the wet, C Drive or C Drive2?
Yokohama C Drive, 74 vs 67 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, C Drive or C Drive2?
Yokohama C Drive, 71 vs 63 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, C Drive or C Drive2?
Yokohama C Drive, 72 vs 68 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, C Drive or C Drive2?
Yokohama C Drive, 66 vs 62 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology