Yokohama C Drive looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama C Drive vs Yokohama C Drive2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 45 + 31 owner reviews. How we score

C Drive is ahead, 71–64

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama C Drive
Tire AYokohama

C Drive

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 45 reviews

Yokohama C Drive2
Tire BYokohama

C Drive2

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 31 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 71

    Dry

    C Drive +8
    63
    Why this score
    SourceC DriveC Drive2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7361

    C Drive: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 73.3 = 71

    C Drive2: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 61 = 63

    No road tests of dry for C Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for C Drive2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 74

    Wet

    C Drive +7
    67
    Why this score
    SourceC DriveC Drive2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7566

    C Drive: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74

    C Drive2: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.8 = 67

    No road tests of wet for C Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for C Drive2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 72

    Comfort

    C Drive +4
    68
    Why this score
    SourceC DriveC Drive2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7466

    C Drive: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 74.3 = 72

    C Drive2: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.1 = 68

    No road tests of comfort for C Drive or C Drive2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 66

    Treadwear

    C Drive +4
    62
    Why this score
    SourceC DriveC Drive2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6760

    C Drive: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 66

    C Drive2: 60% × 63.9 (est.) + 40% × 59.9 = 62

    No road tests of treadwear for C Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for C Drive2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  5. 72

    Handling (owners)

    C Drive +11
    61
    Why this score
    SourceC DriveC Drive2
    Reviews found online7261
Scores at a glance
Yokohama C Drive vs Yokohama C Drive2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryYokohama C DriveYokohama C Drive2
Relative Score 71 64
Dry 71 63
Wet 74 67
Comfort 72 68
Treadwear 66 62
Handling (owners) 72 61

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

C Drive

C Drive2

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A C Drive

Pros

  • Excellent wet weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
  • High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Predictable, progressive handling characteristics

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread life reports ranging from premature wear to high mileage
  • Some users report increased noise and stiffness as the tire ages
  • Mixed feedback on dry grip performance under aggressive driving conditions
All owner themes in the C Drive review

Tire B C Drive2

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and vibration damping
  • Low road noise levels
  • Strong wet weather performance for most users

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting rapid wear
  • Handling can feel vague or lack feedback for performance-oriented drivers
  • Sudden loss of grip at the limit
All owner themes in the C Drive2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama C Drive B · Yokohama C Drive2
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—3
Rim diameters—16″ – 18″

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama C Drive

Yokohama C Drive2

Winner: Yokohama C Drive — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama C Drive scores 72 vs 61 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama C Drive scores 71 vs 63 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama C Drive scores 74 vs 67 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama C Drive scores 72 vs 68 on comfort.

Tire A · Yokohama C Drive
Tire B · Yokohama C Drive2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

C Drive or C Drive2?

Which is better in the wet, C Drive or C Drive2?

Yokohama C Drive, 74 vs 67 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, C Drive or C Drive2?

Yokohama C Drive, 71 vs 63 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, C Drive or C Drive2?

Yokohama C Drive, 72 vs 68 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, C Drive or C Drive2?

Yokohama C Drive, 66 vs 62 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology