Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 11 reviews
Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v vs Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 11 + 21 owner reviews. How we score
iceGUARD iG51v leads, 70–68 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 1 test Owners 63 · 21 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
Blizzak WS90 +373Why this score
Source iceGUARD iG51v Blizzak WS90 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 85 Reviews found online 71 54 iceGUARD iG51v: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.2 = 70
Blizzak WS90: 60% × 84.9 + 40% × 54.1 = 73
No road tests of dry for iceGUARD iG51v. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
77
Wet
iceGUARD iG51v +1067Why this score
Source iceGUARD iG51v Blizzak WS90 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 76 (est.) 66 Reviews found online 80 69 iceGUARD iG51v: 60% × 75.6 (est.) + 40% × 79.6 = 77
Blizzak WS90: 60% × 65.6 + 40% × 68.5 = 67
No road tests of wet for iceGUARD iG51v. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
74
Snow
iceGUARD iG51v +173Why this score
Source iceGUARD iG51v Blizzak WS90 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 72 (est.) 69 Reviews found online 76 79 iceGUARD iG51v: 60% × 72.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.8 = 74
Blizzak WS90: 60% × 68.9 + 40% × 78.6 = 73
No road tests of snow for iceGUARD iG51v. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
69
Comfort
iceGUARD iG51v +861Why this score
Source iceGUARD iG51v Blizzak WS90 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 69 Reviews found online 69 55 iceGUARD iG51v: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 68.8 = 69
Blizzak WS90: 40% × 68.8 + 60% × 55.1 = 61
No road tests of comfort for iceGUARD iG51v. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
63
Noise
Level63Why this score
Source iceGUARD iG51v Blizzak WS90 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 57 51 iceGUARD iG51v: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 57.4 = 63
Blizzak WS90: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 50.9 = 63
No road tests of noise for iceGUARD iG51v. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
56
Treadwear
Blizzak WS90 +561Why this score
Source iceGUARD iG51v Blizzak WS90 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 49 58 iceGUARD iG51v: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 49 = 56
Blizzak WS90: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 57.8 = 61
No road tests of treadwear for iceGUARD iG51v. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak WS90. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison62Why this score
Source iceGUARD iG51v Blizzak WS90 Reviews found online – 62
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v | Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 68 |
| Dry | 70 | 73 |
| Wet | 77 | 67 |
| Snow | 74 | 73 |
| Comfort | 69 | 61 |
| Noise | 63 | 63 |
| Treadwear | 56 | 61 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 62 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
iceGUARD iG51v
Blizzak WS90
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A iceGUARD iG51v
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Blizzak WS90
Pros
- Outstanding grip and acceleration on ice and hard-packed snow
- Excellent braking performance in hazardous winter conditions
- Strong capability in slush and deep snow
Cons
- Increased road noise during highway driving
- Less responsive or 'softer' handling feel on dry pavement
- Potential for minor rubbing depending on vehicle fitment
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v | B · Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Premium Touring Winter tire | Winter |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 2 | 45 |
| Rim diameters | 18″ | 15″ – 19″ |
| Tread depth | 13/32″ | 11/32″ |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 44 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v
Bridgestone Blizzak WS90
Narrow edge: Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v — better wet and comfort. Pick the Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 if treadwear and dry matter most to you. Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v scores 77 vs 67 on wet.
Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v scores 69 vs 61 on comfort.
Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 scores 61 vs 56 on treadwear.
Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 scores 73 vs 70 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
iceGUARD iG51v or Blizzak WS90?
Which is better in the wet, iceGUARD iG51v or Blizzak WS90?
Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v, 77 vs 67 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, iceGUARD iG51v or Blizzak WS90?
Bridgestone Blizzak WS90, 73 vs 70 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, iceGUARD iG51v or Blizzak WS90?
Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 73 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, iceGUARD iG51v or Blizzak WS90?
Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 63 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, iceGUARD iG51v or Blizzak WS90?
Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v, 69 vs 61 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, iceGUARD iG51v or Blizzak WS90?
Bridgestone Blizzak WS90, 61 vs 56 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology