tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama Parada Spec-X vs Nexen N Fera SU1 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 3 road tests and 28 + 164 owner reviews. How we score

Parada Spec-X is ahead, 68–63

Check price on Amazon · Parada Spec-X or N Fera SU1 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama Parada Spec-X
Tire AYokohama

Parada Spec-X

High Performance All-Season tire

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 28 reviews

Nexen N Fera SU1
Tire BNexen

N Fera SU1

Summer

± 7

Tests 63 · 3 tests Owners 62 · 164 reviews

Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 67

    Dry

    Parada Spec-X +8
    59
    Why this score
    SourceParada Spec-XN Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 67 (est.)55
    Reviews found online6664

    Parada Spec-X: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 66 = 67

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 55 + 40% × 64.2 = 59

    No road tests of dry for Parada Spec-X. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 72

    Wet

    Parada Spec-X +8
    64
    Why this score
    SourceParada Spec-XN Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 72 (est.)62
    Reviews found online7367

    Parada Spec-X: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 72.8 = 72

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 61.9 + 40% × 67.3 = 64

    No road tests of wet for Parada Spec-X. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 68

    Snow

    Parada Spec-X +10
    58
    Why this score
    SourceParada Spec-XN Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online6650

    Parada Spec-X: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 66.3 = 68

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 49.8 = 58

    No road tests of snow for Parada Spec-X. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for N Fera SU1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 69

    Comfort

    Parada Spec-X +3
    66
    Why this score
    SourceParada Spec-XN Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 69 (est.)66
    Reviews found online6966

    Parada Spec-X: 40% × 69.1 (est.) + 60% × 68.9 = 69

    N Fera SU1: 40% × 65.7 + 60% × 65.5 = 66

    No road tests of comfort for Parada Spec-X. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 69

    Noise

    Level
    69
    Why this score
    SourceParada Spec-XN Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 67 (est.)69
    Reviews found online7370

    Parada Spec-X: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 69

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 69.3 + 40% × 69.7 = 69

    No road tests of noise for Parada Spec-X. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 61

    Treadwear

    N Fera SU1 +5
    66
    Why this score
    SourceParada Spec-XN Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 63 (est.)70
    Reviews found online5859

    Parada Spec-X: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 57.7 = 61

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 59.2 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for Parada Spec-X. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 70

    Handling (owners)

    Parada Spec-X +4
    66
    Why this score
    SourceParada Spec-XN Fera SU1
    Reviews found online7066
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    76
    Why this score
    SourceParada Spec-XN Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests–76
Scores at a glance
CategoryYokohama Parada Spec-XNexen N Fera SU1
Relative Score 68 63
Dry 67 59
Wet 72 64
Snow 68 58
Comfort 69 66
Noise 69 69
Treadwear 61 66
Handling (owners) 70 66
Efficiency – 76

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Parada Spec-X

± 7

N Fera SU1

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Parada Spec-X

Pros

  • Significantly quieter and more comfortable than competing brands
  • Exceptional wet weather performance, handling heavy rain and standing water with confidence
  • Strong dry traction and responsive overall handling for aggressive driving

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear observed by some drivers, particularly on heavy SUVs
  • Shorter lifespan under harsh winter conditions or aggressive driving styles
All owner themes in the Parada Spec-X review

Tire B N Fera SU1

Pros

  • Exceptional value and significantly lower price compared to premium brands
  • Remarkably quiet ride and high overall comfort
  • Strong dry and wet grip for daily commuting and spirited driving

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can cause vague handling, body roll, or a floating sensation on heavier vehicles
  • Faster than average tread wear or inconsistent durability for some users
  • Reports of rubber cracking or splitting along the sidewalls and tread blocks over time
All owner themes in the N Fera SU1 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama Parada Spec-X B · Nexen N Fera SU1
CategoryHigh Performance All-Season tireSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available2397
Rim diameters18″ – 24″15″ – 24″
Tread depth11/32″9/32″
UTQG420 A A300 A A
Treadwear warranty—25,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi51 psi
Sizes in common22

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama Parada Spec-X

Nexen N Fera SU1

Winner: Yokohama Parada Spec-X — better snow, dry and wet. Pick the Nexen N Fera SU1 if treadwear matters most to you.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Yokohama Parada Spec-X scores 68 vs 58 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama Parada Spec-X scores 67 vs 59 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama Parada Spec-X scores 72 vs 64 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 66 vs 61 on treadwear.

Tire A · Yokohama Parada Spec-X
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Nexen N Fera SU1
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Parada Spec-X or N Fera SU1?

Which is better in the wet, Parada Spec-X or N Fera SU1?

Yokohama Parada Spec-X, 72 vs 64 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Parada Spec-X or N Fera SU1?

Yokohama Parada Spec-X, 67 vs 59 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Parada Spec-X or N Fera SU1?

Yokohama Parada Spec-X, 68 vs 58 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Parada Spec-X or N Fera SU1?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 69 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Parada Spec-X or N Fera SU1?

Yokohama Parada Spec-X, 69 vs 66 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Parada Spec-X or N Fera SU1?

Nexen N Fera SU1, 66 vs 61 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology