Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 28 reviews
Yokohama Parada Spec-X vs Nexen N Fera SU1 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Parada Spec-X leads, 68–64 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 64 · 3 tests Owners 63 · 164 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Parada Spec-X +959Why this score
Source Parada Spec-X N Fera SU1 Professional tests (TWG score) – 55 Reviews found online 68 64 -
72
Wet
Parada Spec-X +765Why this score
Source Parada Spec-X N Fera SU1 Professional tests (TWG score) – 63 Reviews found online 73 68 -
67
Snow
Parada Spec-X +958Why this score
Source Parada Spec-X N Fera SU1 Reviews found online 65 50 -
70
Comfort
Parada Spec-X +466Why this score
Source Parada Spec-X N Fera SU1 Professional tests (TWG score) – 66 Reviews found online 70 67 -
69
Noise
Level69Why this score
Source Parada Spec-X N Fera SU1 Professional tests (TWG score) – 69 Reviews found online 73 69 -
63
Treadwear
N Fera SU1 +467Why this score
Source Parada Spec-X N Fera SU1 Professional tests (TWG score) – 70 Reviews found online 61 61 -
72
Handling
Parada Spec-X +666Why this score
Source Parada Spec-X N Fera SU1 Reviews found online 72 66
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama Parada Spec-X | Nexen N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 64 |
| Dry | 68 | 59 |
| Wet | 72 | 65 |
| Snow | 67 | 58 |
| Comfort | 70 | 66 |
| Noise | 69 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 63 | 67 |
| Handling | 72 | 66 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Parada Spec-X
N Fera SU1
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Parada Spec-X
Pros
- Significantly quieter and more comfortable than competing brands
- Exceptional wet weather performance, handling heavy rain and standing water with confidence
- Strong dry traction and responsive overall handling for aggressive driving
Cons
- Accelerated tread wear observed by some drivers, particularly on heavy SUVs
- Shorter lifespan under harsh winter conditions or aggressive driving styles
Tire B N Fera SU1
Pros
- Exceptional value and significantly lower price compared to premium brands
- Remarkably quiet ride and high overall comfort
- Strong dry and wet grip for daily commuting and spirited driving
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can cause vague handling, body roll, or a floating sensation on heavier vehicles
- Faster than average tread wear or inconsistent durability for some users
- Reports of rubber cracking or splitting along the sidewalls and tread blocks over time
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama Parada Spec-X | B · Nexen N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | High Performance Summer tire | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 23 | 97 |
| Rim diameters | 18″ – 24″ | 15″ – 24″ |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 420 A A | 300 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 25,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama Parada Spec-X
Nexen N Fera SU1
Winner: Yokohama Parada Spec-X — better dry, snow and wet. Pick the Nexen N Fera SU1 if treadwear matters most to you.
Yokohama Parada Spec-X scores 68 vs 59 on dry.
Yokohama Parada Spec-X scores 67 vs 58 on snow.
Yokohama Parada Spec-X scores 72 vs 65 on wet.
Yokohama Parada Spec-X scores 72 vs 66 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.