Minerva Ice+ S 110 review
Add your size for an exact match
The Amazon link then searches this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
The Minerva Ice+ S 110 receives highly polarized feedback, with a significant divide between users who find them adequate for daily driving and those who report severe safety concerns. While a minority of users report satisfactory longevity and performance, the majority of critical reviews highlight dangerous handling characteristics, particularly regarding traction and braking on wet surfaces.
What owners say
No road-test results yet, so every score here comes from owner reviews found online.
How scores work
- Relative score
- 0–100. Blends road tests (60%) and owner reviews (40%) category by category, the same way on every TireWheelGuide page. With only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from it, so the score stays closer to average. It needs at least one road test or five owner reviews.
- Road tests
- 0–100 per score, from published tests, newer tests counting more. Each result is compared with every other tire in the same test, so a win against a strong field counts for more. The average tested tire gets 70, the best 100; with only one or two tests a tire stays nearer 70. The discipline rows show % of the best tire in that test.
- Owner reviews
- 0–100 from the owner reviews we found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates and scaled like the road tests: the average tested tire gets 70. With only a few reviews a tire stays near the average.
By owner reviews
52/100From 3 owner reviews analysed, scaled like the road tests: the average tested tire gets 70.
What owners like and dislike
Themes extracted from 3 owner reviews found online.
The Minerva Ice+ S 110 receives highly polarized feedback, with a significant divide between users who find them adequate for daily driving and those who report severe safety concerns. While a minority of users report satisfactory longevity and performance, the majority of critical reviews highlight dangerous handling characteristics, particularly regarding traction and braking on wet surfaces.
Pros
- Competitive longevity for some users
- Cost-effective price point
- Adequate performance for light, non-demanding driving conditions
Cons
- Poor wet weather traction and braking performance
- High propensity for wheel lock-up and skidding
- Lack of confidence-inspiring handling in rain
- Inconsistent performance compared to premium tire brands
Worth knowing
- Users reported significant difficulty with uphill traction and acceleration on wet surfaces.
- Performance concerns were noted even after the recommended break-in period.
Reviews from our readers
Drivers who have these tires on their car, in their own words. We check every review before it goes live.
No reviews from our readers yet
Driving on the Minerva Ice+ S 110? Tell other drivers how it grips, rides and wears.
Write a review
Thanks! Your review will appear here once we have checked it, usually within a few days.
1 published test appearance
Placement within each field. Open a test for the discipline-by-discipline result.
2015 Winter tire Market Overview · 185/60R15
51st of 51
Only the final ranking was published for this test, not the results per discipline.
Other tires to consider
Ranked by our Relative score, weighed against how many reviews and tests stand behind it.
Top rated winter tires
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.