Minerva minerva F105 review
Add your size for an exact match
The Amazon link then searches this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
The Minerva F105 is a budget-oriented tire that receives polarized feedback, primarily criticized for its poor wet-weather performance and inconsistent build quality. While some users find them acceptable for dry-weather, low-speed commuting, a significant number of reviewers report dangerous handling characteristics, including severe aquaplaning and unpredictable traction loss in rain.
What owners say
No road-test results yet, so every score here comes from owner reviews found online.
How scores work
- Relative score
- 0–100. Blends road tests (60%) and owner reviews (40%) category by category, the same way on every TireWheelGuide page. With only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from it, so the score stays closer to average. It needs at least one road test or five owner reviews.
- Road tests
- 0–100 per score, from published tests, newer tests counting more. Each result is compared with every other tire in the same test, so a win against a strong field counts for more. The average tested tire gets 70, the best 100; with only one or two tests a tire stays nearer 70. The discipline rows show % of the best tire in that test.
- Owner reviews
- 0–100 from the owner reviews we found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates and scaled like the road tests: the average tested tire gets 70. With only a few reviews a tire stays near the average.
By owner reviews
29/100From 16 owner reviews analysed, scaled like the road tests: the average tested tire gets 70.
Minerva minerva F105 specs & sizes
Prices vary by size, so each one links out separately.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
What owners like and dislike
Themes extracted from 16 owner reviews found online.
The Minerva F105 is a budget-oriented tire that receives polarized feedback, primarily criticized for its poor wet-weather performance and inconsistent build quality. While some users find them acceptable for dry-weather, low-speed commuting, a significant number of reviewers report dangerous handling characteristics, including severe aquaplaning and unpredictable traction loss in rain.
Pros
- Affordable price point
- Acceptable performance in dry conditions
- Low noise levels reported by some users
- Adequate for light, low-horsepower city driving
Cons
- Extremely poor wet-weather traction and high risk of aquaplaning
- Unpredictable handling and twitchy steering feedback
- Concerns regarding structural integrity, including belt separation and sidewall splitting
- Rapid or uneven tread wear
Worth knowing
- Users with higher-horsepower or performance-oriented vehicles (e.g., Mazda6 V6, RX-8) frequently report dissatisfaction with handling and stability.
- Drivers of older Audi models noted that while the tires may suffice for low-output engines, they become unreliable under spirited driving or adverse weather conditions.
Reviews from our readers
Drivers who have these tires on their car, in their own words. We check every review before it goes live.
No reviews from our readers yet
Driving on the Minerva minerva F105? Tell other drivers how it grips, rides and wears.
Write a review
Thanks! Your review will appear here once we have checked it, usually within a few days.
1 published test appearance
Placement within each field. Open a test for the discipline-by-discipline result.
2014 Auto Bild 50 Summer tire Shootout · 225/50 R17
40th of 49
Only the final ranking was published for this test, not the results per discipline.
Source: Auto Bild
Other tires to consider
Ranked by our Relative score, weighed against how many reviews and tests stand behind it.
Top rated summer tires
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.