Head-to-head Updated

Armstrong Blu-Trac HP vs Toyo Extensa HP II — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 18 + 54 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Blu-Trac HP 68, Extensa HP II 67.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Armstrong Blu-Trac HP
Tire AArmstrong

Blu-Trac HP

Summer tire

± 7Provisional

Tests – · 1 test Owners 69 · 18 reviews

Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Toyo Extensa HP II
Tire BToyo

Extensa HP II

High Performance All-Season tire

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 54 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 70

    Dry

    Blu-Trac HP +1
    69
    Why this score
    SourceBlu-Trac HPExtensa HP II
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7270

    Blu-Trac HP: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.8 = 70

    Extensa HP II: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 69

    No road tests of dry for Blu-Trac HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Extensa HP II. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 69

    Wet

    Blu-Trac HP +1
    68
    Why this score
    SourceBlu-Trac HPExtensa HP II
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6966

    Blu-Trac HP: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 69 = 69

    Extensa HP II: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.4 = 68

    No road tests of wet for Blu-Trac HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Extensa HP II. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 57

    Snow

    Extensa HP II +3
    60
    Why this score
    SourceBlu-Trac HPExtensa HP II
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online4752

    Blu-Trac HP: 60% × 63.1 (est.) + 40% × 47.2 = 57

    Extensa HP II: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 52.3 = 60

    No road tests of snow for Blu-Trac HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Extensa HP II. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    Level
    66
    Why this score
    SourceBlu-Trac HPExtensa HP II
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6564

    Blu-Trac HP: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 64.9 = 66

    Extensa HP II: 40% × 67.8 (est.) + 60% × 64.4 = 66

    No road tests of comfort for Blu-Trac HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Extensa HP II. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 69

    Noise

    Blu-Trac HP +2
    67
    Why this score
    SourceBlu-Trac HPExtensa HP II
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7468

    Blu-Trac HP: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 73.7 = 69

    Extensa HP II: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 68.2 = 67

    No road tests of noise for Blu-Trac HP or Extensa HP II. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 73

    Treadwear

    Blu-Trac HP +2
    71
    Why this score
    SourceBlu-Trac HPExtensa HP II
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests70≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7774

    Blu-Trac HP: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 76.7 = 73

    Extensa HP II: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 73.9 = 71

    No road tests of treadwear for Extensa HP II. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

Scores at a glance
Armstrong Blu-Trac HP vs Toyo Extensa HP II: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryArmstrong Blu-Trac HPToyo Extensa HP II
Relative Score 68 67
Dry 70 69
Wet 69 68
Snow 57 60
Comfort 66 66
Noise 69 67
Treadwear 73 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Blu-Trac HP

± 7

Extensa HP II

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Blu-Trac HP

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Extensa HP II

Pros

  • Exceptional value and affordable price point
  • Strong dry and wet traction/grip
  • Low road noise and quiet ride comfort

Cons

  • Limited performance in snow and freezing winter conditions
  • Some concerns regarding high-speed stability and traction past normal limits
  • Potential for a loose feel during aggressive lane changes in inclement weather
All owner themes in the Extensa HP II review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Armstrong Blu-Trac HP B · Toyo Extensa HP II
CategorySummer tireHigh Performance All-Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available8862
Rim diameters14″ – 21″15″ – 22″
Tread depth10/32″9 - 10/32″
UTQG340 A A500 A A
Treadwear warranty45,000 mi45,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlack Side Wall
Max pressure44 psi50 - 51 psi
Sizes in common4949

Which one should you actually buy?

Armstrong Blu-Trac HP

Toyo Extensa HP II

Too close to call: Armstrong Blu-Trac HP and Toyo Extensa HP II are within 2 points overall. Toyo Extensa HP II is stronger on snow. Armstrong Blu-Trac HP rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 18 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Toyo Extensa HP II scores 60 vs 57 on snow.

Tire A · Armstrong Blu-Trac HP
Tire B · Toyo Extensa HP II

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Blu-Trac HP or Extensa HP II?

Which is better in the wet, Blu-Trac HP or Extensa HP II?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 68 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Blu-Trac HP or Extensa HP II?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 69 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Blu-Trac HP or Extensa HP II?

Toyo Extensa HP II, 60 vs 57 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Blu-Trac HP or Extensa HP II?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 67 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Blu-Trac HP or Extensa HP II?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 66 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Blu-Trac HP or Extensa HP II?

Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 71 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology