Head-to-head Updated

Avon Turbosteel 70 vs Continental PureContact LS — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 2 + 25 owner reviews. How we score

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Avon Turbosteel 70
Tire AAvon

Turbosteel 70

Summer Touring tires

Tests – · none yet Owners – · 2 reviews (needs 5)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. –

    Dry

    No comparison
    69
    Why this score
    SourceTurbosteel 70PureContact LS
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online–70

    PureContact LS: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 69

    No road tests of dry for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. –

    Wet

    No comparison
    72
    Why this score
    SourceTurbosteel 70PureContact LS
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online–73

    PureContact LS: 60% × 71.7 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 72

    No road tests of wet for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    67
    Why this score
    SourceTurbosteel 70PureContact LS
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online–64

    PureContact LS: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 67

    No road tests of snow for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. –

    Comfort

    No comparison
    59
    Why this score
    SourceTurbosteel 70PureContact LS
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–55

    PureContact LS: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 54.7 = 59

    No road tests of comfort for PureContact LS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    68
    Why this score
    SourceTurbosteel 70PureContact LS
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–71

    PureContact LS: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 70.8 = 68

    No road tests of noise for PureContact LS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. –

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    68
    Why this score
    SourceTurbosteel 70PureContact LS
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–69

    PureContact LS: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 68.6 = 68

    No road tests of treadwear for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    70
    Why this score
    SourceTurbosteel 70PureContact LS
    Reviews found online–70
Scores at a glance
Avon Turbosteel 70 vs Continental PureContact LS: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryAvon Turbosteel 70Continental PureContact LS
Relative Score – 69
Dry – 69
Wet – 72
Snow – 67
Comfort – 59
Noise – 68
Treadwear – 68
Handling (owners) – 70

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Turbosteel 70

± 7

PureContact LS

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Turbosteel 70

Pros

  • Excellent ride comfort and quiet operation
  • Authentic period-correct aesthetic for classic vehicles
  • High manufacturing quality and factory-balanced roundness

Cons

  • Reports of severe internal structural failure
  • Limited availability and niche application
  • Potential for deformation under load
All owner themes in the Turbosteel 70 review

Tire B PureContact LS

Pros

  • Exceptionally quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong wet and dry traction with reliable handling
  • Good balance of everyday comfort and long treadlife

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can lead to less responsive or wandering handling during aggressive cornering
  • Develops temporary flat spotting when parked, causing morning vibrations
  • Poor winter performance, particularly lacking traction on snow and ice despite being an all-season tire
All owner themes in the PureContact LS review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Avon Turbosteel 70 B · Continental PureContact LS
CategorySummer Touring tiresAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG—700 A A
Treadwear warranty—70,000 mi
Sidewall—Black Side Wall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Avon Turbosteel 70

Continental PureContact LS

Only Continental PureContact LS has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Avon Turbosteel 70
Tire B · Continental PureContact LS

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology