Tests – · none yet Owners 48 · 14 reviews
Avon ZT7 vs Toyo NanoEnergy 3 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 14 + 1,120 owner reviews. How we score
NanoEnergy 3 is ahead, 69–56
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 1,120 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
57
Dry
NanoEnergy 3 +1269Why this score
Source ZT7 NanoEnergy 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 51 70 ZT7: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.7 = 57
NanoEnergy 3: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 69.7 = 69
No road tests of dry for ZT7. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for NanoEnergy 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
60
Wet
NanoEnergy 3 +868Why this score
Source ZT7 NanoEnergy 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 55 66 ZT7: 60% × 62.3 (est.) + 40% × 55.4 = 60
NanoEnergy 3: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.3 = 68
No road tests of wet for ZT7. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for NanoEnergy 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
56
Comfort
NanoEnergy 3 +1470Why this score
Source ZT7 NanoEnergy 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 50 70 ZT7: 40% × 64.8 (est.) + 60% × 49.6 = 56
NanoEnergy 3: 40% × 69 (est.) + 60% × 69.9 = 70
No road tests of comfort for ZT7. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for NanoEnergy 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
49
Treadwear
NanoEnergy 3 +2271Why this score
Source ZT7 NanoEnergy 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 56 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 38 73 ZT7: 60% × 56.3 (est.) + 40% × 37.9 = 49
NanoEnergy 3: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 73 = 71
No road tests of treadwear for ZT7. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for NanoEnergy 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
49
Handling (owners)
NanoEnergy 3 +2170Why this score
Source ZT7 NanoEnergy 3 Reviews found online 49 70
Scores at a glance
| Category | Avon ZT7 | Toyo NanoEnergy 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 56 | 69 |
| Dry | 57 | 69 |
| Wet | 60 | 68 |
| Comfort | 56 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 49 | 71 |
| Handling (owners) | 49 | 70 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ZT7
NanoEnergy 3
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ZT7
Pros
- High value for money compared to premium brands like Pirelli or Continental
- Impressively low noise levels and high ride comfort due to compliant sidewalls
- Good grip and predictable handling for daily commuting and normal driving conditions
Cons
- Tendency for premature sidewall cracking or perishing within 2 to 4 years
- Prone to progressive understeer or reduced grip when pushed hard in corners
- Inconsistent wet performance and aquaplaning susceptibility reported by some commercial users
Tire B NanoEnergy 3
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noticeably low road noise
- Great value for money and affordable pricing
- Impression-worthy tread wear longevity and slow wear rate
Cons
- Unpredictable or sub-par wet weather grip, leading to occasional sliding or hydroplaning concerns
- Soft sidewalls that can compromise sharp turn-in response and cause tire flex during hard cornering
- Reduced performance and hardening after extended use (over multiple years)
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Avon ZT7 | B · Toyo NanoEnergy 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 48 |
| Rim diameters | — | 13″ – 17″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Avon ZT7
Toyo NanoEnergy 3
Winner: Toyo NanoEnergy 3 — better treadwear, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Avon ZT7 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Toyo NanoEnergy 3 scores 71 vs 49 on treadwear.
Toyo NanoEnergy 3 scores 70 vs 49 on handling.
Toyo NanoEnergy 3 scores 70 vs 56 on comfort.
Toyo NanoEnergy 3 scores 69 vs 57 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ZT7 or NanoEnergy 3?
Which is better in the wet, ZT7 or NanoEnergy 3?
Toyo NanoEnergy 3, 68 vs 60 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ZT7 or NanoEnergy 3?
Toyo NanoEnergy 3, 69 vs 57 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, ZT7 or NanoEnergy 3?
Toyo NanoEnergy 3, 70 vs 56 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ZT7 or NanoEnergy 3?
Toyo NanoEnergy 3, 71 vs 49 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology