Head-to-head Updated

Toyo Proxes TR1 vs Toyo NanoEnergy 3 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 903 + 1,120 owner reviews. How we score

NanoEnergy 3 is ahead, 69–64

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Toyo Proxes TR1
Tire AToyo

Proxes TR1

Summer

± 9

Tests 62 · 1 test Owners 66 · 903 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 6 in 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test (comfort (tester's mark))

“Avoid TR1.. the sound will become unbearable.. I suggest Yokohama ES32..”

Toyo NanoEnergy 3
Tire BToyo

NanoEnergy 3

Summer

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 1,120 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 59

    Dry

    NanoEnergy 3 +10
    69
    Why this score
    SourceProxes TR1NanoEnergy 3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests53≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6970

    Proxes TR1: 60% × 52.8 + 40% × 69.3 = 59

    NanoEnergy 3: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 69

    No road tests of dry for NanoEnergy 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 68

    Wet

    Level
    68
    Why this score
    SourceProxes TR1NanoEnergy 3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests67≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7066

    Proxes TR1: 60% × 66.5 + 40% × 70.1 = 68

    NanoEnergy 3: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.3 = 68

    No road tests of wet for NanoEnergy 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 63

    Comfort

    NanoEnergy 3 +6
    69
    Why this score
    SourceProxes TR1NanoEnergy 3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests68≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online5970

    Proxes TR1: 40% × 68.1 + 60% × 59.1 = 63

    NanoEnergy 3: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 69.9 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for NanoEnergy 3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 68

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceProxes TR1NanoEnergy 3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests68–
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)–

    Proxes TR1: 60% × 68.2 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 68

    No owner ratings of noise for Proxes TR1. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 63

    Treadwear

    NanoEnergy 3 +8
    71
    Why this score
    SourceProxes TR1NanoEnergy 3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6073

    Proxes TR1: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 60.2 = 63

    NanoEnergy 3: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 73 = 71

    No road tests of treadwear for Proxes TR1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for NanoEnergy 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 72

    Handling (owners)

    Proxes TR1 +2
    70
    Why this score
    SourceProxes TR1NanoEnergy 3
    Reviews found online7270
  7. 71

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceProxes TR1NanoEnergy 3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests71–
Scores at a glance
Toyo Proxes TR1 vs Toyo NanoEnergy 3: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryToyo Proxes TR1Toyo NanoEnergy 3
Relative Score 64 69
Dry 59 69
Wet 68 68
Comfort 63 69
Noise 68 –
Treadwear 63 71
Handling (owners) 72 70
Efficiency 71 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 9

Proxes TR1

± 8

NanoEnergy 3

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Proxes TR1

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and responsive steering feedback
  • High value-for-money proposition compared to premium tier-one brands
  • Attractive and aggressive directional tread design

Cons

  • Noticeable road noise and humming sounds at certain speeds
  • Soft sidewalls that can cause a slight squirm or delayed initial steering response
  • Rapid tread wear, particularly under aggressive driving or on rear axles
All owner themes in the Proxes TR1 review

Tire B NanoEnergy 3

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and noticeably low road noise
  • Great value for money and affordable pricing
  • Impression-worthy tread wear longevity and slow wear rate

Cons

  • Unpredictable or sub-par wet weather grip, leading to occasional sliding or hydroplaning concerns
  • Soft sidewalls that can compromise sharp turn-in response and cause tire flex during hard cornering
  • Reduced performance and hardening after extended use (over multiple years)
All owner themes in the NanoEnergy 3 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Toyo Proxes TR1

Mixed

Community sentiment regarding the Toyo Proxes TR1 is mixed, with users frequently noting an attractive price point and smooth, comfortable ride when compared to factory tires or run-flats. However, multiple drivers report shortcomings in wet-weather performance, cold grip, and road noise as mileage increases, while several criticize its soft sidewalls for creating imprecise handling at the limit.

Top themes
#Wet grip performance#Soft sidewall stiffness#Affordable price point#Road noise issues#Ride comfort comparison#Handling at limit#T1R model confusion

Based on 36 community posts

Tire B

Toyo NanoEnergy 3

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Toyo Proxes TR1 B · Toyo NanoEnergy 3
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available6148
Rim diameters14″ – 20″13″ – 17″
Sizes in common1414

Which one should you actually buy?

Toyo Proxes TR1

Toyo NanoEnergy 3

Winner: Toyo NanoEnergy 3 — better dry, treadwear and comfort. Where the Toyo Proxes TR1 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Toyo NanoEnergy 3 scores 69 vs 59 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Toyo NanoEnergy 3 scores 71 vs 63 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Toyo NanoEnergy 3 scores 69 vs 63 on comfort.

Tire A · Toyo Proxes TR1
Tire B · Toyo NanoEnergy 3

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Proxes TR1 or NanoEnergy 3?

Which is better in the wet, Proxes TR1 or NanoEnergy 3?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 68 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Proxes TR1 or NanoEnergy 3?

Toyo NanoEnergy 3, 69 vs 59 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Proxes TR1 or NanoEnergy 3?

Toyo NanoEnergy 3, 69 vs 63 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Proxes TR1 or NanoEnergy 3?

Toyo NanoEnergy 3, 71 vs 63 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology