Tests 62 · 1 test Owners 66 · 903 reviews
Best test result: #3 of 6 in 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test (comfort (tester's mark))
“Avoid TR1.. the sound will become unbearable.. I suggest Yokohama ES32..”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 14 road tests and 903 + 2,521 owner reviews. How we score
Ventus Prime 4 is ahead, 75–64
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 62 · 1 test Owners 66 · 903 reviews
Best test result: #3 of 6 in 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test (comfort (tester's mark))
“Avoid TR1.. the sound will become unbearable.. I suggest Yokohama ES32..”
Tests 77 · 14 tests Owners 71 · 2,521 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)
“Aim for rainy condition. Best are 1.Bridgestone Turanza 005 2.Hankook ventus prime 4.”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Proxes TR1 | Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 12 tests | 53 | 83 |
| Reviews found online | 69 | 73 |
Proxes TR1: 60% × 52.8 + 40% × 69.3 = 59
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 82.7 + 40% × 73 = 79
| Source | Proxes TR1 | Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 13 tests | 67 | 79 |
| Reviews found online | 70 | 75 |
Proxes TR1: 60% × 66.5 + 40% × 70.1 = 68
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 78.6 + 40% × 74.5 = 77
| Source | Proxes TR1 | Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests | 68 | 70 |
| Reviews found online | 59 | 67 |
Proxes TR1: 40% × 68.1 + 60% × 59.1 = 63
Ventus Prime 4: 40% × 70.3 + 60% × 67.4 = 69
| Source | Proxes TR1 | Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 8 tests | 68 | 58 |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 66 (est.) | ≈ 66 (est.) |
Proxes TR1: 60% × 68.2 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 68
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 57.6 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 61
No owner ratings of noise for Proxes TR1 or Ventus Prime 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | Proxes TR1 | Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests | ≈ 64 (est.) | 79 |
| Reviews found online | 60 | 67 |
Proxes TR1: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 60.2 = 63
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 78.5 + 40% × 66.9 = 74
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes TR1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | Proxes TR1 | Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 72 | 72 |
| Source | Proxes TR1 | Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 9 tests | 71 | 84 |
| Category | Toyo Proxes TR1 | Hankook Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 64 | 75 |
| Dry | 59 | 79 |
| Wet | 68 | 77 |
| Comfort | 63 | 69 |
| Noise | 68 | 61 |
| Treadwear | 63 | 74 |
| Handling (owners) | 72 | 72 |
| Efficiency | 71 | 84 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Proxes TR1
Ventus Prime 4
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Proxes TR1 | Ventus Prime 4 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 87% #5/6 · 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test | 92% #16/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 96% #6/6 · 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test | 99% #6/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 97% #5/6 · 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test | 91% #16/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 82% #5/6 · 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test | 87% #14/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 87% #5/6 · 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test | 98% #4/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 95% #5/6 · 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test | 99% #2/8 · 2025 Moottori Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 92% #3/6 · 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test | 95% #4/7 · 2025 Die ReifenTester Summer Touring Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 99% #4/6 · 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test | 99% #4/8 · 2025 Moottori Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 94% #3/6 · 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test | 95% #10/14 · 2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #5/6 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test | #11/16 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment regarding the Toyo Proxes TR1 is mixed, with users frequently noting an attractive price point and smooth, comfortable ride when compared to factory tires or run-flats. However, multiple drivers report shortcomings in wet-weather performance, cold grip, and road noise as mileage increases, while several criticize its soft sidewalls for creating imprecise handling at the limit.
“Bekomme ich mit unterschiedliche Reifen Modelle Probleme mit dem Verteiler Getriebe? Hallo, ich habe mal eine Frage bezüglich Reifen und dem Verteilergetriebe. Ich habe vor ein paar Jahren einen gebrauchten Felgensatz gekauft auf dem Reifen aus dem Jahr 2016 waren Profiltiefe der Reifen war bei allen neuwertig. Anfang diesen Jahres habe ich mir dann hinten links einen Platten gefahren. Ich habe dann die Reifen hinten achsweise getauscht mit dem selben Reifen was verbaut war (neue toyo proxes tr1 Reifen. Unglücklicherweise habe ich jetzt wieder einen platten Reifen, allerdings vorne. Nun wollte ich wieder 2 neue Reifen für vorne bestellen (ebenfalls toyo proxes tr1). Leider läuft dieses Modell wohl aus und sind nicht mehr verfügbar. Meine Frage jetzt, kann ich andere Reifen Modelle nutzen (toyo comfort in den selben Maßen wie den Proxes tr1) oder sind diese problematisch? Vielen Dank im Voraus 🙂 Read more”
“I had asymmetric 2 or possibly 3's on an impreza and they were a fantastic all rounder. The 5's will be going on my daily when i find a good deal!”
“70l46 did you get yours mounted and balanced for that price? I picked mine up at tiredealsforless.com for $765.12 shipped. They had the best prices that I have seen.”
Based on 36 community posts
Community opinion on the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is largely positive, with drivers viewing it as a comfortable, quiet, and capable touring tire. Users frequently praise its strong dry and wet performance alongside its compelling price-to-performance ratio compared to premium alternatives like Michelin. Some uncertainties exist regarding long-term tread wear and slight fuel economy impacts, but owners generally report satisfactory everyday reliability.
“Found a cut on one of my tires, is it 100% cooked? Three month old Hankook Ventus Prime 4 and I found a cut/split. It’s holding air fine but it is cooked?”
“Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs Kumho Ecsta HS52? Hey there! Went to this reddit after reading a lot of reviews on the website, a bit of a newbie in general. I have read about many models and settled on 2 possible ones due to pricing and availability in my country (not looking for any other options). In my price range and requirements I've settled on Ventus Prime 4 initially (50% cheaper than Primacy that my car came stock with), but have also seen some good stuff said about HS52. I was quite settled on the first one since it scored very well in 2022 Autobild review, but now that 2024 came out a lot of numbers are completely different (predicted tread life alone took a huge dive) and Hankook is now 4 positions lower than Kumho. To add to this, Hankook was only 10% more expensive thank Kumho in my country, but now there was a price drop and and now there is 20% price difference, so set of Kumhos comes out noticeable cheaper. Spec wise they seems very similar with some trade-offs in different departments. I'm not really looking to save as much money as possible, but with latest reviews I'm not sure if there is any improvement worth paying for. Any thoughts? Thanks. Read more”
“Top top top guma, stavio prosle godine kad sam kupio auto, odmah na Kupres isao, snijega i leda bilo dosta, ali izdale me nisu Imam i ljetne hankook ventus prime 4 isto odlicna guma”
Based on 41 community posts
| Attribute | A · Toyo Proxes TR1 | B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Sizes available | 61 | 66 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 20″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| UTQG | — | 200 - 420 A A |
| Sizes in common | 34 | 34 |
Toyo Proxes TR1
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Winner: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — better dry, efficiency and treadwear. Pick the Toyo Proxes TR1 if noise matters most to you.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 79 vs 59 on dry.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 84 vs 71 on efficiency.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 74 vs 63 on treadwear.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 77 vs 68 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 77 vs 68 on our wet score.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 79 vs 59 on our dry score.
Toyo Proxes TR1, 68 vs 61 on our noise score.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 69 vs 63 on our comfort score.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 74 vs 63 on our treadwear score.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 84 vs 71 on our efficiency score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology