Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 4 reviews
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A vs Continental Cross Contact A/T — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 4 + 14 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Advantage T/A and Cross Contact A/T are level at 62.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 14 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
63
Dry
Cross Contact A/T +164Why this score
Source Advantage T/A Cross Contact A/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 61 62 Advantage T/A: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.1 = 63
Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64
No road tests of dry for Advantage T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
64
Wet
Level64Why this score
Source Advantage T/A Cross Contact A/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 62 63 Advantage T/A: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.3 = 64
Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.5 = 64
No road tests of wet for Advantage T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
60
Snow
Advantage T/A +753Why this score
Source Advantage T/A Cross Contact A/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 53 41 Advantage T/A: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 53 = 60
Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 41.3 = 53
No road tests of snow for Advantage T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
61
Comfort
Cross Contact A/T +465Why this score
Source Advantage T/A Cross Contact A/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 54 60 Advantage T/A: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 53.7 = 61
Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 65
No road tests of comfort for Advantage T/A or Cross Contact A/T. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
64
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Advantage T/A Cross Contact A/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 59 – Advantage T/A: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 59.3 = 64
No road tests of noise for Advantage T/A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
64
Treadwear
Cross Contact A/T +165Why this score
Source Advantage T/A Cross Contact A/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 62 64 Advantage T/A: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64
Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Advantage T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
56
Handling (owners)
Cross Contact A/T +662Why this score
Source Advantage T/A Cross Contact A/T Reviews found online 56 62
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich Advantage T/A | Continental Cross Contact A/T |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 62 |
| Dry | 63 | 64 |
| Wet | 64 | 64 |
| Snow | 60 | 53 |
| Comfort | 61 | 65 |
| Noise | 64 | – |
| Treadwear | 64 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 56 | 62 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Advantage T/A
Cross Contact A/T
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Advantage T/A
Pros
- Improved grip levels compared to baseline tires like the XM2
- Adequate stiffness in cold weather conditions
Cons
- Highly unpredictable compound performance
- Poor heat resistance leading to a 'mushy' feel in hot weather
- Lack of confidence-inspiring grip in cold and wet conditions
Tire B Cross Contact A/T
Pros
- Excellent on-road comfort and handling with acceptable noise levels
- High potential longevity and mileage for many users, with sets lasting upwards of 50,000 to 80,000 km/miles
- Competent dry and wet performance on paved surfaces
Cons
- Susceptibility to punctures and fragile sidewalls reported by some drivers
- Rapid, premature tread wear experienced by certain users
- Poor traction and spinning issues in winter conditions such as snow and ice
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A | B · Continental Cross Contact A/T |
|---|---|---|
| Category | High Performance All Season tire | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 560 - 680 A A - B | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A
Continental Cross Contact A/T
Too close to call: BFGoodrich Advantage T/A and Continental Cross Contact A/T are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich Advantage T/A is stronger on snow. Continental Cross Contact A/T is stronger on handling and comfort. BFGoodrich Advantage T/A rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 4 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Continental Cross Contact A/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A scores 60 vs 53 on snow.
Continental Cross Contact A/T scores 62 vs 56 on handling.
Continental Cross Contact A/T scores 65 vs 61 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Advantage T/A or Cross Contact A/T?
Which is better in the wet, Advantage T/A or Cross Contact A/T?
Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 64 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Advantage T/A or Cross Contact A/T?
Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 64 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, Advantage T/A or Cross Contact A/T?
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A, 60 vs 53 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Advantage T/A or Cross Contact A/T?
Continental Cross Contact A/T, 65 vs 61 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Advantage T/A or Cross Contact A/T?
Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology