Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A vs Continental Cross Contact A/T — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 4 + 14 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Advantage T/A and Cross Contact A/T are level at 62.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A

Advantage T/A

High Performance All Season tire

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 4 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 63

    Dry

    Cross Contact A/T +1
    64
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/ACross Contact A/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6162

    Advantage T/A: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.1 = 63

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64

    No road tests of dry for Advantage T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 64

    Wet

    Level
    64
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/ACross Contact A/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6263

    Advantage T/A: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.3 = 64

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.5 = 64

    No road tests of wet for Advantage T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 60

    Snow

    Advantage T/A +7
    53
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/ACross Contact A/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online5341

    Advantage T/A: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 53 = 60

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 41.3 = 53

    No road tests of snow for Advantage T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 61

    Comfort

    Cross Contact A/T +4
    65
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/ACross Contact A/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online5460

    Advantage T/A: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 53.7 = 61

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for Advantage T/A or Cross Contact A/T. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 64

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/ACross Contact A/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online59–

    Advantage T/A: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 59.3 = 64

    No road tests of noise for Advantage T/A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 64

    Treadwear

    Cross Contact A/T +1
    65
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/ACross Contact A/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6264

    Advantage T/A: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Advantage T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 56

    Handling (owners)

    Cross Contact A/T +6
    62
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/ACross Contact A/T
    Reviews found online5662
Scores at a glance
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A vs Continental Cross Contact A/T: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich Advantage T/AContinental Cross Contact A/T
Relative Score 62 62
Dry 63 64
Wet 64 64
Snow 60 53
Comfort 61 65
Noise 64 –
Treadwear 64 65
Handling (owners) 56 62

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Advantage T/A

Cross Contact A/T

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Advantage T/A

Pros

  • Improved grip levels compared to baseline tires like the XM2
  • Adequate stiffness in cold weather conditions

Cons

  • Highly unpredictable compound performance
  • Poor heat resistance leading to a 'mushy' feel in hot weather
  • Lack of confidence-inspiring grip in cold and wet conditions
All owner themes in the Advantage T/A review

Tire B Cross Contact A/T

Pros

  • Excellent on-road comfort and handling with acceptable noise levels
  • High potential longevity and mileage for many users, with sets lasting upwards of 50,000 to 80,000 km/miles
  • Competent dry and wet performance on paved surfaces

Cons

  • Susceptibility to punctures and fragile sidewalls reported by some drivers
  • Rapid, premature tread wear experienced by certain users
  • Poor traction and spinning issues in winter conditions such as snow and ice
All owner themes in the Cross Contact A/T review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A B · Continental Cross Contact A/T
CategoryHigh Performance All Season tireAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Tread depth10 - 12/32″—
UTQG560 - 680 A A - B—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure44 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A

Continental Cross Contact A/T

Too close to call: BFGoodrich Advantage T/A and Continental Cross Contact A/T are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich Advantage T/A is stronger on snow. Continental Cross Contact A/T is stronger on handling and comfort. BFGoodrich Advantage T/A rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 4 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Continental Cross Contact A/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A scores 60 vs 53 on snow.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental Cross Contact A/T scores 62 vs 56 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Continental Cross Contact A/T scores 65 vs 61 on comfort.

Tire A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A
Tire B · Continental Cross Contact A/T

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Advantage T/A or Cross Contact A/T?

Which is better in the wet, Advantage T/A or Cross Contact A/T?

Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 64 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Advantage T/A or Cross Contact A/T?

Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 64 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Advantage T/A or Cross Contact A/T?

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A, 60 vs 53 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Advantage T/A or Cross Contact A/T?

Continental Cross Contact A/T, 65 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Advantage T/A or Cross Contact A/T?

Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology