Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 4 reviews
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A vs General Altimax Arctic — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 4 + 32 owner reviews. How we score
Advantage T/A leads, 62–59 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 53 · 32 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
63
Dry
Advantage T/A +657Why this score
Source Advantage T/A Altimax Arctic Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 61 51 Advantage T/A: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.1 = 63
Altimax Arctic: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.5 = 57
No road tests of dry for Advantage T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Altimax Arctic. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
64
Wet
Advantage T/A +262Why this score
Source Advantage T/A Altimax Arctic Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 62 60 Advantage T/A: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.3 = 64
Altimax Arctic: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 59.8 = 62
No road tests of wet for Advantage T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Altimax Arctic. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
60
Snow
Advantage T/A +159Why this score
Source Advantage T/A Altimax Arctic Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 53 52 Advantage T/A: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 53 = 60
Altimax Arctic: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 51.6 = 59
No road tests of snow for Advantage T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Altimax Arctic. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
61
Comfort
Advantage T/A +160Why this score
Source Advantage T/A Altimax Arctic Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 54 51 Advantage T/A: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 53.7 = 61
Altimax Arctic: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 50.8 = 60
No road tests of comfort for Advantage T/A or Altimax Arctic. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
64
Noise
Advantage T/A +262Why this score
Source Advantage T/A Altimax Arctic Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 59 54 Advantage T/A: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 59.3 = 64
Altimax Arctic: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 54.1 = 62
No road tests of noise for Advantage T/A or Altimax Arctic. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
64
Treadwear
Advantage T/A +757Why this score
Source Advantage T/A Altimax Arctic Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 62 50 Advantage T/A: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64
Altimax Arctic: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.1 = 57
No road tests of treadwear for Advantage T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Altimax Arctic. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
56
Handling (owners)
Advantage T/A +749Why this score
Source Advantage T/A Altimax Arctic Reviews found online 56 49
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich Advantage T/A | General Altimax Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 59 |
| Dry | 63 | 57 |
| Wet | 64 | 62 |
| Snow | 60 | 59 |
| Comfort | 61 | 60 |
| Noise | 64 | 62 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 57 |
| Handling (owners) | 56 | 49 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Advantage T/A
Altimax Arctic
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Advantage T/A
Pros
- Improved grip levels compared to baseline tires like the XM2
- Adequate stiffness in cold weather conditions
Cons
- Highly unpredictable compound performance
- Poor heat resistance leading to a 'mushy' feel in hot weather
- Lack of confidence-inspiring grip in cold and wet conditions
Tire B Altimax Arctic
Pros
- Exceptional grip and traction in deep snow, slush, and ice
- High value and affordable price point compared to premium competitors
- Reliable wet and dry handling during cold weather months
Cons
- Handling and responsiveness drop off compared to dedicated summer or all-season tires
- Some users report accelerated wear once the tire reaches 50% tread life
- Minor tendencies toward understeer during hard cornering
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A | B · General Altimax Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Category | High Performance All Season tire | Winter Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 560 - 680 A A - B | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A
General Altimax Arctic
Narrow edge: BFGoodrich Advantage T/A — better treadwear, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. BFGoodrich Advantage T/A rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 4 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A scores 64 vs 57 on treadwear.
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A scores 56 vs 49 on handling.
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A scores 63 vs 57 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Advantage T/A or Altimax Arctic?
Which is better in the wet, Advantage T/A or Altimax Arctic?
Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 62 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Advantage T/A or Altimax Arctic?
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A, 63 vs 57 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Advantage T/A or Altimax Arctic?
Neither, by our numbers: 60 vs 59 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, Advantage T/A or Altimax Arctic?
Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 62 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Advantage T/A or Altimax Arctic?
Neither, by our numbers: 61 vs 60 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Advantage T/A or Altimax Arctic?
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A, 64 vs 57 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology