Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 4 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A vs Kumho Ecowing ES31 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Ecowing ES31 leads, 64–62 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 9,834 reviews
“Tengo las kumho ecowing es31 y ninguna queja, siempre respondieron bien aunque la verdad manejo como un abuelo, solo una vez frene fuerte en la panamericana y nunca bloquearon, las volveria a poner en otro auto.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
63
Dry
Ecowing ES31 +265Why this score
Source Advantage T/A Ecowing ES31 Reviews found online 61 63 -
64
Wet
Ecowing ES31 +165Why this score
Source Advantage T/A Ecowing ES31 Reviews found online 62 64 -
60
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Advantage T/A Ecowing ES31 Reviews found online 53 – -
62
Comfort
Ecowing ES31 +567Why this score
Source Advantage T/A Ecowing ES31 Reviews found online 54 65 -
63
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Advantage T/A Ecowing ES31 Reviews found online 58 – -
64
Treadwear
Advantage T/A +163Why this score
Source Advantage T/A Ecowing ES31 Reviews found online 62 62 -
56
Handling
Ecowing ES31 +359Why this score
Source Advantage T/A Ecowing ES31 Reviews found online 56 59
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich Advantage T/A | Kumho Ecowing ES31 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 64 |
| Dry | 63 | 65 |
| Wet | 64 | 65 |
| Snow | 60 | – |
| Comfort | 62 | 67 |
| Noise | 63 | – |
| Treadwear | 64 | 63 |
| Handling | 56 | 59 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
62
/ 100
Advantage T/A
64
/ 100
Ecowing ES31
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Advantage T/A
Pros
- Improved grip levels compared to baseline tires like the XM2
- Adequate stiffness in cold weather conditions
Cons
- Highly unpredictable compound performance
- Poor heat resistance leading to a 'mushy' feel in hot weather
- Lack of confidence-inspiring grip in cold and wet conditions
Tire B Ecowing ES31
Pros
- Exceptional value and affordability compared to premium brand alternatives
- Low road noise and enhanced ride comfort over bumps and speed humps
- Improved fuel economy and reduced rolling resistance
Cons
- Polarizing wet weather performance, with some users reporting frightening losses of traction
- Soft sidewalls that can feel vague during quick lane changes or lead to vulnerability against curbs and potholes
- Occasional reports of accelerated or uneven tread wear on outer shoulders
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Mixed
Kumho Ecowing ES31
The Kumho Ecowing ES31 is generally viewed as an affordable, budget-friendly mid-range summer tire that offers good durability and dry grip, making it popular among commuters and rideshare drivers. However, opinions are mixed regarding its wet weather performance, with some users reporting poor wet grip while others find it acceptable for cautious, everyday driving.
r/carros
·8 upvotes ·2026-03-04
“Certa vez, nos comentários de um vídeo sobre pneus no YouTube, vi a galera que trabalha com Uber falando bem do Ecowing ES31, relatando que tem ótima durabilidade. Resolvi arriscar e coloquei, são ótimos mesmo, já rodei 18 mil km e estão impecáveis ainda.”
r/TyreReviews
·2 upvotes ·2025-11-05
“The EU label is all over the place. But none have A-A-A as far as I can tell. Did not score good in wet in the test on the site. Wear rate on a Mazda 2 should be decent with almost anything. Why not look at all seasons? Sava All weather and Kumho Solus are closest to the ES31 in price.”
r/CarsAustralia
·2 upvotes ·2026-07-05
“ES31s are fine, they're your usual budget tyre. Certainly not meant for any spirited driving or for sport type cars. I've had them before on the front my my Yaris and they were acceptable, got maybe 40,000km out of them.”
Top themes
#Cost effectiveness and value#Wet weather grip#Treadwear and durability#Budget tier limitations#Urban commuting suitability
Based on 12 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A | B · Kumho Ecowing ES31 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | High Performance All Season tire | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 39 |
| Rim diameters | — | 13″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 560 - 680 A A - B | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
62
/ 100
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A
64
/ 100
Kumho Ecowing ES31
Winner: Kumho Ecowing ES31 — better comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Kumho Ecowing ES31 scores 67 vs 62 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Kumho Ecowing ES31 scores 59 vs 56 on handling.
Tire A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A
Tire B · Kumho Ecowing ES31
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.