Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 1,575 reviews
“I like mine so much I'm on my second set. I got 55k out of my first set (could have got another 10k but started to get a little noisy). Exact tire you have (265/70-17 C load) on a 2018 4Runner.”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 1,575 + 102 owner reviews. How we score
All-Terrain T/A KO2 leads, 72–68 Narrow edge
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 1,575 reviews
“I like mine so much I'm on my second set. I got 55k out of my first set (could have got another 10k but started to get a little noisy). Exact tire you have (265/70-17 C load) on a 2018 4Runner.”
Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 102 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | All-Terrain T/A KO2 | Destination LE2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 71 (est.) | ≈ 68 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 75 | 67 |
All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 73
Destination LE2: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.9 = 67
No road tests of dry for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Destination LE2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | All-Terrain T/A KO2 | Destination LE2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 71 (est.) | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 72 | 69 |
All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 72 = 72
Destination LE2: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 69.1 = 70
No road tests of wet for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Destination LE2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | All-Terrain T/A KO2 | Destination LE2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 73 (est.) | ≈ 68 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 77 | 64 |
All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 77.2 = 75
Destination LE2: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 66
No road tests of snow for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for Destination LE2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
| Source | All-Terrain T/A KO2 | Destination LE2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 69 (est.) | ≈ 68 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 71 | 62 |
All-Terrain T/A KO2: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71 = 70
Destination LE2: 40% × 67.7 (est.) + 60% × 61.5 = 64
No road tests of comfort for All-Terrain T/A KO2 or Destination LE2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | All-Terrain T/A KO2 | Destination LE2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 67 (est.) | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 73 | 72 |
All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.6 = 69
Destination LE2: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 71.5 = 69
No road tests of noise for All-Terrain T/A KO2 or Destination LE2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | All-Terrain T/A KO2 | Destination LE2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 70 (est.) | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 77 | 69 |
All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 77.1 = 73
Destination LE2: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 68
No road tests of treadwear for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Destination LE2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
| Source | All-Terrain T/A KO2 | Destination LE2 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 69 | 67 |
| Category | BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 | Firestone Destination LE2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 68 |
| Dry | 73 | 67 |
| Wet | 72 | 70 |
| Snow | 75 | 66 |
| Comfort | 70 | 64 |
| Noise | 69 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 73 | 68 |
| Handling (owners) | 69 | 67 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
All-Terrain T/A KO2
Destination LE2
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment toward the BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 is largely positive, with drivers frequently praising its aggressive styling, tough sidewalls, off-road durability, and solid general performance. Many owners report capable handling in snow, though several emphasize that it cannot replace a dedicated winter tire and can struggle on ice or packed snow. Criticisms center on high pricing, added weight hurting fuel economy, mud packing, occasional tread chunking, and difficulties with balancing causing highway vibrations.
“Yes, totally fine to run them on the stock 5.5" wide wheels, no rubbing and they're a good option for an upgrade while minimising drawbacks. I ran exactly that size KO2 for ~50,000 km, ended up selling them onto someone else and swapped to different wheels and tyres just for something different.”
“I drove to the Deadhorse, Alaska (as far north as you can drive in America). The Dalton highway is a notorious 400 mile gravel road start just north of Fairbanks. Lots of people bring 2 spares. I had 0 flats. KO2 eat snow and sand for breakfast. They definitely improve my Q5 and allow me to hang with proper off-roaders (at least for a little while)”
“I run Hakkapeliittas in the winter (UP of Michigan, 300"+ of snow per year) but I ran my KO2s last winter and they performed surprisingly well. They do struggle in ice and burnished snowpack, especially under 15F in my experience and since they have no siping they don't clear as well as snow tires. If it's KO2s vs. All Seasons I'd go with the KO2s, just know they still don't beat proper snow tires.”
Based on 395 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 | B · Firestone Destination LE2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 49 | 5 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 16″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 13 - 15/32″ | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 520 A B |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised White Lettering | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 35 - 80 psi | 44 psi |
| Sizes in common | 3 | 3 |
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2
Firestone Destination LE2
Narrow edge: BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 — better snow, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 75 vs 66 on snow.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 73 vs 67 on dry.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 70 vs 64 on comfort.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 73 vs 68 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 70 on the wet score, within 3 points.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 73 vs 67 on our dry score.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 75 vs 66 on our snow score.
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 69 on the noise score, within 3 points.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 70 vs 64 on our comfort score.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 73 vs 68 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology