Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 1,575 reviews
“I like mine so much I'm on my second set. I got 55k out of my first set (could have got another 10k but started to get a little noisy). Exact tire you have (265/70-17 C load) on a 2018 4Runner.”
Head-to-head
Updated
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 vs Michelin LTX A/T2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 1,575 + 7 owner reviews. How we score
LTX A/T2 leads, 77–73 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 78 · 7 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 18 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Terrain Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
73
Dry
LTX A/T2 +275Why this score
Source All-Terrain T/A KO2 LTX A/T2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 75 79 All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 73
LTX A/T2: 60% × 72.6 (est.) + 40% × 78.9 = 75
No road tests of dry for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for LTX A/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
72
Wet
LTX A/T2 +577Why this score
Source All-Terrain T/A KO2 LTX A/T2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 76 (est.) Reviews found online 72 80 All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 72
LTX A/T2: 60% × 75.6 (est.) + 40% × 79.5 = 77
No road tests of wet for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for LTX A/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
75
Snow
All-Terrain T/A KO2 +273Why this score
Source All-Terrain T/A KO2 LTX A/T2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 77 75 All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 77.2 = 75
LTX A/T2: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.9 = 73
No road tests of snow for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for LTX A/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
70
Comfort
LTX A/T2 +373Why this score
Source All-Terrain T/A KO2 LTX A/T2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 71 75 All-Terrain T/A KO2: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71 = 70
LTX A/T2: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 74.6 = 73
No road tests of comfort for All-Terrain T/A KO2 or LTX A/T2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
69
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source All-Terrain T/A KO2 LTX A/T2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 73 – All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 69
No road tests of noise for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
73
Treadwear
LTX A/T2 +982Why this score
Source All-Terrain T/A KO2 LTX A/T2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 85 Reviews found online 77 78 All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 77 = 73
LTX A/T2: 60% × 85 + 40% × 78.1 = 82
No road tests of treadwear for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
69
Handling (owners)
LTX A/T2 +1281Why this score
Source All-Terrain T/A KO2 LTX A/T2 Reviews found online 69 81
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 | Michelin LTX A/T2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 77 |
| Dry | 73 | 75 |
| Wet | 72 | 77 |
| Snow | 75 | 73 |
| Comfort | 70 | 73 |
| Noise | 69 | – |
| Treadwear | 73 | 82 |
| Handling (owners) | 69 | 81 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
73
/ 100
All-Terrain T/A KO2
77
/ 100
LTX A/T2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 finished ahead 0 times and Michelin LTX A/T2 1 times.
| Discipline | Category | All-Terrain T/A KO2 | LTX A/T2 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #11/13 | #5/13 | – | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 SA4x4 All-Terrain Tire Test R17 · 265/65R17 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A All-Terrain T/A KO2
Pros
- Exceptional off-road traction and puncture resistance on rocks, gravel, and dirt
- Aggressive, rugged aesthetics that enhance the look of trucks and SUVs
- Impressive tread longevity and high mileage capabilities
Cons
- Reduced grip and slippery performance in wet conditions, rain, and standing water
- Rubber tends to harden over time, negatively impacting cold-weather and ice traction
- Higher price point compared to some competitors
Tire B LTX A/T2
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and overall durability
- Reliable wet and dry road traction
- Improved steering response and ride comfort compared to competitors
Cons
- Premium price point
- Performance in deep snow and ice is considered adequate but not class-leading
- Rubber compounds may become slippery or lose traction as the tire reaches advanced age
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Positive
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2
Community sentiment toward the BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 is largely positive, with drivers frequently praising its aggressive styling, tough sidewalls, off-road durability, and solid general performance. Many owners report capable handling in snow, though several emphasize that it cannot replace a dedicated winter tire and can struggle on ice or packed snow. Criticisms center on high pricing, added weight hurting fuel economy, mud packing, occasional tread chunking, and difficulties with balancing causing highway vibrations.
ramforum.com
·1 upvote ·2018-10-01
“I really like my KO2s. Great traction in wet/dry/gravel/dirt conditions, not noisy on the pavement, they wear very evenly and my current set is coming up on 32K miles. The tires had 15/32" tread depth when new, I'm down to about 8/32" left, minimum tread is 4/32" so they're good for a little while yet. Won't hesitate to buy another set when the time comes.”
4runner6g.com
·2026-05-08
“I ran the stock AT3’s on TH for about 5k miles with no issues. They were quiet and handled sand, small/medium rock gardens and steps fine - though I was pretty concerned about punctures in the rocks. They were excellent in rain and surprisingly good in light snow which is pretty rare here in TX. I switched to 285/75/17 AT3’s because I wanted more rubber and contact when airing down. I’ve never run the AT4’s so I can’t speak to their capabilities. I’ve run BFG KO2’s, KO3’s and MT’s on other vehicles and they are excellent off road. The KO2’s and MT’s were not great in rain, but you learned how to deal with them. The KO3 is superior to the AT3 off road IMO. The downside being it’s hard to find load ranges other than E. That was one of the reasons I stayed with AT3’s when I went to a larger tire. I could get it in load range C, I was confident it could handle the off road conditions I would use them in, and they were excellent on road. The majority of my use is on road so I tried to be realistic and factor that in to the selection - not that I don’t look at a set of 35” R/T Pro’s and think “I Want That”.”
jeeprenegadeforum.com
·2018-03-03
“FWIW, I had the same 18s that you have and went to a 16" Vision Cross wheel and wrapped them in 225/70 KO2s. I weighed the stock wheels and the new wheels and the new set is only 2 pounds heavier than stock at most. I don't notice much acceleration loss, but I really don't beat on my jeep either. I did notice a little "hum" once I'm going 30mph but it's nothing annoying at all and I don't even hear it anymore. I have also carefully measured MPGs with both set ups and I have not lost anything. This is calculated MPG, not just what the computer says and I do add an additional 2.5% due to the increase in tire circumference. My avg is 25.1 (25.73 when adding the 2.5%) and my commute is 75% hwy and 25% local. I was afraid to get the KO2s because of added weight, tire noise and mpg loss, but I was afraid for nothing. Just my 2 cents, but I remember reading most people talk about how bad things would be with these tires. I'm glad I listened to those who said mpg loss would be minimal at most. Mike”
Top themes
#aggressive look#winter and snow traction#sidewall durability#balancing and vibrations#road noise levels#fuel economy impact#tread wear life
Based on 395 community posts
Tire B
Michelin LTX A/T2
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 | B · Michelin LTX A/T2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 49 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | — |
| Tread depth | 13 - 15/32″ | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised White Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 35 - 80 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
73
/ 100
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2
77
/ 100
Michelin LTX A/T2
Narrow edge: Michelin LTX A/T2 — better handling, treadwear and wet. Where the BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Michelin LTX A/T2 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin LTX A/T2 scores 81 vs 69 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Michelin LTX A/T2 scores 82 vs 73 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin LTX A/T2 scores 77 vs 72 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin LTX A/T2 scores 73 vs 70 on comfort.
Tire A · BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2
Tire B · Michelin LTX A/T2
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
All-Terrain T/A KO2 or LTX A/T2?
Which is better in the wet, All-Terrain T/A KO2 or LTX A/T2?
Michelin LTX A/T2, 77 vs 72 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, All-Terrain T/A KO2 or LTX A/T2?
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 75 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, All-Terrain T/A KO2 or LTX A/T2?
Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 73 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, All-Terrain T/A KO2 or LTX A/T2?
Michelin LTX A/T2, 73 vs 70 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, All-Terrain T/A KO2 or LTX A/T2?
Michelin LTX A/T2, 82 vs 73 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology