Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 1,575 reviews
“I like mine so much I'm on my second set. I got 55k out of my first set (could have got another 10k but started to get a little noisy). Exact tire you have (265/70-17 C load) on a 2018 4Runner.”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 1,575 + 70 owner reviews. How we score
All-Terrain T/A KO2 leads, 73–69 Narrow edge
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 1,575 reviews
“I like mine so much I'm on my second set. I got 55k out of my first set (could have got another 10k but started to get a little noisy). Exact tire you have (265/70-17 C load) on a 2018 4Runner.”
Tests – · 1 test Owners 70 · 70 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | All-Terrain T/A KO2 | Roadian AT Pro RA8 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 71 (est.) | ≈ 68 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 75 | 67 |
All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 73
Roadian AT Pro RA8: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 67
No road tests of dry for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Roadian AT Pro RA8. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | All-Terrain T/A KO2 | Roadian AT Pro RA8 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 71 (est.) | ≈ 71 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 72 | 71 |
All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 72 = 72
Roadian AT Pro RA8: 60% × 70.6 (est.) + 40% × 70.5 = 71
No road tests of wet for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Roadian AT Pro RA8. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | All-Terrain T/A KO2 | Roadian AT Pro RA8 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 73 (est.) | ≈ 71 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 77 | 71 |
All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 77.2 = 75
Roadian AT Pro RA8: 60% × 70.8 (est.) + 40% × 70.8 = 71
No road tests of snow for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for Roadian AT Pro RA8. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
| Source | All-Terrain T/A KO2 | Roadian AT Pro RA8 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 69 (est.) | ≈ 68 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 71 | 63 |
All-Terrain T/A KO2: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71 = 70
Roadian AT Pro RA8: 40% × 68.1 (est.) + 60% × 63.4 = 65
No road tests of comfort for All-Terrain T/A KO2 or Roadian AT Pro RA8. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | All-Terrain T/A KO2 | Roadian AT Pro RA8 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 67 (est.) | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 73 | 71 |
All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.6 = 69
Roadian AT Pro RA8: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 68
No road tests of noise for All-Terrain T/A KO2 or Roadian AT Pro RA8. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | All-Terrain T/A KO2 | Roadian AT Pro RA8 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests | ≈ 70 (est.) | 67 |
| Reviews found online | 77 | 73 |
All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 77.1 = 73
Roadian AT Pro RA8: 60% × 66.8 + 40% × 73.3 = 69
No road tests of treadwear for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
| Source | All-Terrain T/A KO2 | Roadian AT Pro RA8 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 69 | – |
| Category | BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 | Nexen Roadian AT Pro RA8 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 69 |
| Dry | 73 | 67 |
| Wet | 72 | 71 |
| Snow | 75 | 71 |
| Comfort | 70 | 65 |
| Noise | 69 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 73 | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | 69 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
All-Terrain T/A KO2
Roadian AT Pro RA8
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 finished ahead 1 times and Nexen Roadian AT Pro RA8 0 times.
| Discipline | Category | All-Terrain T/A KO2 | Roadian AT Pro RA8 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #11/13 | #12/13 | – | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 SA4x4 All-Terrain Tire Test R17 · 265/65R17 |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment toward the BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 is largely positive, with drivers frequently praising its aggressive styling, tough sidewalls, off-road durability, and solid general performance. Many owners report capable handling in snow, though several emphasize that it cannot replace a dedicated winter tire and can struggle on ice or packed snow. Criticisms center on high pricing, added weight hurting fuel economy, mud packing, occasional tread chunking, and difficulties with balancing causing highway vibrations.
“I have ran both of those options in the past all on half ton trucks. Like other have said a lot depends on what you will use your truck for but for me the all around comfort and off road/winter performance would go to Falken. The KO2 for me had a harsher ride obviously because it's a 8 ply D rate tire. The KO2 also seems to wear fast initially and then i don't know if the rubber compound changed or what but it became hard and noisy but did last a really long time. The Falken were quieter and better riding through out the entire life of the tire. They only thing i would suggest is go to a reputable tire store and have them road force balance. I ran two sets of Falkens on previous trucks with no issues but when i tried to put them on my current 22' F150 i went through 7 different tires and they still couldn't get them to balance properly so i just sent them back and put some Yokohama G015 AT's on it. I'm not sure if it was an issue with the balancer at the shop i was at, their distributor sending them crappy tires, or a bad run of tires from Falken but i would definitely pay the extra to have them road force balanced. Good luck with choosing a tire!”
“Nitto RidgeGrapplers… I had them for 4 years and had tons of tread left after 40000 miles until I got a new job where my truck stayed on that dark asphalt 10 hours a day and they started cracking but I had the 10ply tires as I used to pull a 16ft trailer with mowers all the time… my tires had several small nails in them but it never once had a flat somehow. They do good in the slick stuff although I had 4wd but I only ever drove on ice one time and they did better than I thought. I currently have KO2s… honestly not a fan simply because balancing them is a nightmare for some reason”
“I run Hakkapeliittas in the winter (UP of Michigan, 300"+ of snow per year) but I ran my KO2s last winter and they performed surprisingly well. They do struggle in ice and burnished snowpack, especially under 15F in my experience and since they have no siping they don't clear as well as snow tires. If it's KO2s vs. All Seasons I'd go with the KO2s, just know they still don't beat proper snow tires.”
Based on 395 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 | B · Nexen Roadian AT Pro RA8 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 49 | 39 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 13 - 15/32″ | 13/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 560 A B |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised White Lettering | Outlined White Lettering |
| Max pressure | 35 - 80 psi | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 25 | 25 |
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2
Nexen Roadian AT Pro RA8
Narrow edge: BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 — better dry, comfort and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 73 vs 67 on dry.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 70 vs 65 on comfort.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 75 vs 71 on snow.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 73 vs 69 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 71 on the wet score, within 3 points.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 73 vs 67 on our dry score.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 75 vs 71 on our snow score.
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 68 on the noise score, within 3 points.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 70 vs 65 on our comfort score.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 73 vs 69 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology