Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 1,575 reviews
“I like mine so much I'm on my second set. I got 55k out of my first set (could have got another 10k but started to get a little noisy). Exact tire you have (265/70-17 C load) on a 2018 4Runner.”
Head-to-head
Updated
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 vs Nitto NT05 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 1,575 + 43 owner reviews. How we score
All-Terrain T/A KO2 is ahead, 72–50
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
73
Dry
All-Terrain T/A KO2 +1063Why this score
Source All-Terrain T/A KO2 NT05 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 75 60 All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 73
NT05: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 60 = 63
No road tests of dry for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for NT05. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
72
Wet
All-Terrain T/A KO2 +3042Why this score
Source All-Terrain T/A KO2 NT05 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 49 (est.) Reviews found online 72 32 All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 72 = 72
NT05: 60% × 49.2 (est.) + 40% × 31.7 = 42
No road tests of wet for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for NT05. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
75
Snow
All-Terrain T/A KO2 +3936Why this score
Source All-Terrain T/A KO2 NT05 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 50 (est.) Reviews found online 77 15 All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 77.2 = 75
NT05: 60% × 50 (est.) + 40% × 15.2 = 36
No road tests of snow for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for NT05. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
70
Comfort
All-Terrain T/A KO2 +2149Why this score
Source All-Terrain T/A KO2 NT05 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 71 39 All-Terrain T/A KO2: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71 = 70
NT05: 40% × 63.6 (est.) + 60% × 38.9 = 49
No road tests of comfort for All-Terrain T/A KO2 or NT05. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
69
Noise
All-Terrain T/A KO2 +762Why this score
Source All-Terrain T/A KO2 NT05 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 73 55 All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.6 = 69
NT05: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 55.1 = 62
No road tests of noise for All-Terrain T/A KO2 or NT05. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
73
Treadwear
All-Terrain T/A KO2 +2350Why this score
Source All-Terrain T/A KO2 NT05 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 57 (est.) Reviews found online 77 40 All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 77.1 = 73
NT05: 60% × 56.9 (est.) + 40% × 39.7 = 50
No road tests of treadwear for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for NT05. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
69
Handling (owners)
All-Terrain T/A KO2 +1455Why this score
Source All-Terrain T/A KO2 NT05 Reviews found online 69 55
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 | Nitto NT05 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 50 |
| Dry | 73 | 63 |
| Wet | 72 | 42 |
| Snow | 75 | 36 |
| Comfort | 70 | 49 |
| Noise | 69 | 62 |
| Treadwear | 73 | 50 |
| Handling (owners) | 69 | 55 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
All-Terrain T/A KO2
50
/ 100
NT05
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A All-Terrain T/A KO2
Pros
- Exceptional off-road traction and puncture resistance on rocks, gravel, and dirt
- Aggressive, rugged aesthetics that enhance the look of trucks and SUVs
- Impressive tread longevity and high mileage capabilities
Cons
- Reduced grip and slippery performance in wet conditions, rain, and standing water
- Rubber tends to harden over time, negatively impacting cold-weather and ice traction
- Higher price point compared to some competitors
Tire B NT05
Pros
- Exceptional dry traction and cornering grip
- Predictable and progressive handling limits
- Good value and competitive price point for a performance tire
Cons
- Poor performance and traction in heavy rain or wet conditions
- Can be noisy or develop a whistling sound at highway speeds
- May overheat or struggle under extreme track conditions for prolonged sessions
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Positive
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2
Community sentiment toward the BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 is largely positive, with drivers frequently praising its aggressive styling, tough sidewalls, off-road durability, and solid general performance. Many owners report capable handling in snow, though several emphasize that it cannot replace a dedicated winter tire and can struggle on ice or packed snow. Criticisms center on high pricing, added weight hurting fuel economy, mud packing, occasional tread chunking, and difficulties with balancing causing highway vibrations.
f150gen14.com
·1 upvote ·2023-03-29
“I have ran both of those options in the past all on half ton trucks. Like other have said a lot depends on what you will use your truck for but for me the all around comfort and off road/winter performance would go to Falken. The KO2 for me had a harsher ride obviously because it's a 8 ply D rate tire. The KO2 also seems to wear fast initially and then i don't know if the rubber compound changed or what but it became hard and noisy but did last a really long time. The Falken were quieter and better riding through out the entire life of the tire. They only thing i would suggest is go to a reputable tire store and have them road force balance. I ran two sets of Falkens on previous trucks with no issues but when i tried to put them on my current 22' F150 i went through 7 different tires and they still couldn't get them to balance properly so i just sent them back and put some Yokohama G015 AT's on it. I'm not sure if it was an issue with the balancer at the shop i was at, their distributor sending them crappy tires, or a bad run of tires from Falken but i would definitely pay the extra to have them road force balanced. Good luck with choosing a tire!”
r/Trucks
·3 upvotes ·2022-11-17
“Nitto RidgeGrapplers… I had them for 4 years and had tons of tread left after 40000 miles until I got a new job where my truck stayed on that dark asphalt 10 hours a day and they started cracking but I had the 10ply tires as I used to pull a 16ft trailer with mowers all the time… my tires had several small nails in them but it never once had a flat somehow. They do good in the slick stuff although I had 4wd but I only ever drove on ice one time and they did better than I thought. I currently have KO2s… honestly not a fan simply because balancing them is a nightmare for some reason”
r/XVcrosstrek
·6 upvotes ·2019-01-31
“I run Hakkapeliittas in the winter (UP of Michigan, 300"+ of snow per year) but I ran my KO2s last winter and they performed surprisingly well. They do struggle in ice and burnished snowpack, especially under 15F in my experience and since they have no siping they don't clear as well as snow tires. If it's KO2s vs. All Seasons I'd go with the KO2s, just know they still don't beat proper snow tires.”
Top themes
#aggressive look#winter and snow traction#sidewall durability#balancing and vibrations#road noise levels#fuel economy impact#tread wear life
Based on 395 community posts
Tire B
Nitto NT05
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 | B · Nitto NT05 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 49 | 23 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 13 - 15/32″ | 7.2/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 200 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised White Lettering | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 35 - 80 psi | 50 psi |
| Sizes in common | 0 | 0 |
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2
50
/ 100
Nitto NT05
Winner: BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 — better snow, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 75 vs 36 on snow.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 72 vs 42 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 73 vs 50 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 70 vs 49 on comfort.
Tire A · BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2
Tire B · Nitto NT05
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
All-Terrain T/A KO2 or NT05?
Which is better in the wet, All-Terrain T/A KO2 or NT05?
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 72 vs 42 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, All-Terrain T/A KO2 or NT05?
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 73 vs 63 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, All-Terrain T/A KO2 or NT05?
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 75 vs 36 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, All-Terrain T/A KO2 or NT05?
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 69 vs 62 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, All-Terrain T/A KO2 or NT05?
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 70 vs 49 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, All-Terrain T/A KO2 or NT05?
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 73 vs 50 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology