Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R vs Nitto NT05 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 2 + 0 road tests and 4 + 43 owner reviews. How we score

Pilot Sport Cup 2 R is ahead, 66–55

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R

Tests 62 · 2 tests Owners 67 · 4 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 6 in The BEST Track Day Tyres for 2024 (dry braking)

Nitto NT05
Tire BNitto

NT05

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 44 · 43 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 79

    Dry

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 R +14
    65
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2 RNT05
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests79≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online8063

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 R: 60% × 78.8 + 40% × 80.4 = 79

    NT05: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 63.1 = 65

    No road tests of dry for NT05. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 49

    Wet

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 R +4
    45
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2 RNT05
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests45≈ 51 (est.)
    Reviews found online5536

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 R: 60% × 45 + 40% × 54.6 = 49

    NT05: 60% × 50.7 (est.) + 40% × 35.7 = 45

    No road tests of wet for NT05. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    36
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2 RNT05
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 51 (est.)
    Reviews found online–14

    NT05: 60% × 51.3 (est.) + 40% × 13.8 = 36

    No road tests of snow for NT05. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 73

    Comfort

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 R +19
    54
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2 RNT05
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7739

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 R: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 76.8 = 73

    NT05: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 38.6 = 54

    No road tests of comfort for Pilot Sport Cup 2 R or NT05. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 66

    Noise

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 R +2
    64
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2 RNT05
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6358

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 R: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 63 = 66

    NT05: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 64

    No road tests of noise for Pilot Sport Cup 2 R or NT05. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 63

    Treadwear

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 R +11
    52
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2 RNT05
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online6142

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 R: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 60.5 = 63

    NT05: 60% × 58.4 (est.) + 40% × 42.3 = 52

    No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Sport Cup 2 R. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for NT05. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 79

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 R +21
    58
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2 RNT05
    Reviews found online7958
Scores at a glance
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R vs Nitto NT05: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 RNitto NT05
Relative Score 66 55
Dry 79 65
Wet 49 45
Snow – 36
Comfort 73 54
Noise 66 64
Treadwear 63 52
Handling (owners) 79 58

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Pilot Sport Cup 2 R

NT05

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Pilot Sport Cup 2 R

Pros

  • Phenomenal dry grip providing a planted and confident feel on the track
  • Optimized design specifically for extracting maximum performance during time attacks
  • Superior circuit performance compared to the standard Pilot Sport Cup 2

Cons

  • Extremely limited performance longevity, with grip dropping off rapidly after just a few laps
  • Poor performance and safety risks in damp to wet conditions due to shallow and narrow tread patterns
  • Best suited strictly for single-lap time trials rather than extended track sessions
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport Cup 2 R review

Tire B NT05

Pros

  • Exceptional dry traction and cornering grip
  • Predictable and progressive handling limits
  • Good value and competitive price point for a performance tire

Cons

  • Poor performance and traction in heavy rain or wet conditions
  • Can be noisy or develop a whistling sound at highway speeds
  • May overheat or struggle under extreme track conditions for prolonged sessions
All owner themes in the NT05 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R B · Nitto NT05
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available723
Rim diameters20″ – 21″15″ – 20″
Tread depth—7.2/32″
UTQG—200 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—50 psi
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R

Nitto NT05

Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R — better handling, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R scores 79 vs 58 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R scores 73 vs 54 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R scores 79 vs 65 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R scores 63 vs 52 on treadwear.

Tire A · Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R
Tire B · Nitto NT05

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Pilot Sport Cup 2 R or NT05?

Which is better in the wet, Pilot Sport Cup 2 R or NT05?

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R, 49 vs 45 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Pilot Sport Cup 2 R or NT05?

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R, 79 vs 65 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Pilot Sport Cup 2 R or NT05?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 64 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Pilot Sport Cup 2 R or NT05?

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R, 73 vs 54 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Pilot Sport Cup 2 R or NT05?

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R, 63 vs 52 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology