Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 7 reviews
BFGoodrich A/T KO2 vs Kumho PorTran KC53 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
PorTran KC53 leads, 62–58 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 285 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
59
Dry
PorTran KC53 +564Why this score
Source A/T KO2 PorTran KC53 Reviews found online 55 63 -
59
Wet
PorTran KC53 +665Why this score
Source A/T KO2 PorTran KC53 Reviews found online 55 63 -
60
Comfort
PorTran KC53 +161Why this score
Source A/T KO2 PorTran KC53 Reviews found online 51 53 -
63
Treadwear
A/T KO2 +657Why this score
Source A/T KO2 PorTran KC53 Reviews found online 61 52 -
47
Handling
PorTran KC53 +1562Why this score
Source A/T KO2 PorTran KC53 Reviews found online 47 62
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich A/T KO2 | Kumho PorTran KC53 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 58 | 62 |
| Dry | 59 | 64 |
| Wet | 59 | 65 |
| Comfort | 60 | 61 |
| Treadwear | 63 | 57 |
| Handling | 47 | 62 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
A/T KO2
PorTran KC53
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A A/T KO2
Pros
- Exceptional durability and long tread life, holding up well over years and extreme temperatures
- Strong off-road performance in mud, rocks, and sand with reliable sidewall strength when aired down
- Aggressive, appealing visual styling ('badass' look)
Cons
- Increased road noise during daily city driving
- Less than optimal comfort on-road
- Compromised performance and grip in wet on-road conditions
Tire B PorTran KC53
Pros
- Significantly quieter and more refined road noise compared to stock or competitor tires
- Smoother, more forgiving ride quality (frequently noted by motorhome owners)
- Excellent value for money and affordable pricing
Cons
- Occasional wheel spin or reduced forward traction when accelerating quickly in the wet
- Potential for accelerated edge wear under certain loads if pressures are not meticulously managed
- Isolated reports of premature sidewall cracking after a few years
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich A/T KO2 | B · Kumho PorTran KC53 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | — | Van |
| Sizes available | — | 27 |
| Rim diameters | — | 14″ – 18″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
BFGoodrich A/T KO2
Kumho PorTran KC53
Winner: Kumho PorTran KC53 — better handling, wet and dry. Pick the BFGoodrich A/T KO2 if treadwear matters most to you.
Kumho PorTran KC53 scores 62 vs 47 on handling.
BFGoodrich A/T KO2 scores 63 vs 57 on treadwear.
Kumho PorTran KC53 scores 65 vs 59 on wet.
Kumho PorTran KC53 scores 64 vs 59 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.