Tests – · none yet Owners 51 · 217 reviews
“New shoes for the Sunset Truck Hankook Dynapro AT2 Extremes in 30x9.5. Read more”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 217 + 1,575 owner reviews. How we score
All-Terrain T/A KO2 is ahead, 73–57
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 51 · 217 reviews
“New shoes for the Sunset Truck Hankook Dynapro AT2 Extremes in 30x9.5. Read more”
Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 1,575 reviews
“I like mine so much I'm on my second set. I got 55k out of my first set (could have got another 10k but started to get a little noisy). Exact tire you have (265/70-17 C load) on a 2018 4Runner.”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Dynapro AT2 | All-Terrain T/A KO2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 61 (est.) | ≈ 71 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 51 | 75 |
Dynapro AT2: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.7 = 57
All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 73
No road tests of dry for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | Dynapro AT2 | All-Terrain T/A KO2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 62 (est.) | ≈ 71 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 54 | 72 |
Dynapro AT2: 60% × 61.7 (est.) + 40% × 54.3 = 59
All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 72 = 72
No road tests of wet for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Dynapro AT2 | All-Terrain T/A KO2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 65 (est.) | ≈ 73 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 56 | 77 |
Dynapro AT2: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 55.8 = 61
All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 77.2 = 75
No road tests of snow for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
| Source | Dynapro AT2 | All-Terrain T/A KO2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 65 (est.) | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 46 | 71 |
Dynapro AT2: 40% × 64.8 (est.) + 60% × 45.6 = 53
All-Terrain T/A KO2: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71 = 70
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro AT2 or All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Dynapro AT2 | All-Terrain T/A KO2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | – | 73 |
All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.6 = 69
No road tests of noise for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Dynapro AT2 | All-Terrain T/A KO2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 60 (est.) | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 48 | 77 |
Dynapro AT2: 60% × 59.9 (est.) + 40% × 48.2 = 55
All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 77.1 = 73
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
| Source | Dynapro AT2 | All-Terrain T/A KO2 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 48 | 69 |
| Category | Hankook Dynapro AT2 | BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 57 | 73 |
| Dry | 57 | 73 |
| Wet | 59 | 72 |
| Snow | 61 | 75 |
| Comfort | 53 | 70 |
| Noise | – | 69 |
| Treadwear | 55 | 73 |
| Handling (owners) | 48 | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Dynapro AT2
All-Terrain T/A KO2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment regarding the Hankook Dynapro AT2 line is divided, heavily dependent on whether users evaluate the OEM factory tire or the retail/Xtreme version. The standard OEM AT2 receives notable criticism for lacking true all-terrain capability, poor wet/winter grip, and premature wear, while highway comfort and quietness are praised. In contrast, the Dynapro AT2 Xtreme variant receives widespread praise for strong snow traction, improved wet performance, durability, and quiet road manners.
“Fresh shoes 18x9.5 +38 gram light 57DR with 255/60 hankook dynapro AT2 Xtreme.”
“Hankook AT2 Xtreme Any experience with them? Hankook is on sale at the moment. 70K km treadwear warranty.. :) I had AT2 few years ago and they were OK. Also, they were very quiet. Thinking about non-LT for softer ride..”
“I had the Hankook AT2 on my 2019 from the factory and they were way better than the Pirelli's that came on my '15 and my '22 F-150 FX4 trucks. They may not be a true AT tire, but they gave me 50,000 miles and functioned well in MN winters as on road tire and did well enough on the small number of off road excursions they took me on while hunting ( half mile to mile dirt trails and across various set-aside agricultural fields).”
Based on 56 community posts
Community sentiment toward the BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 is largely positive, with drivers frequently praising its aggressive styling, tough sidewalls, off-road durability, and solid general performance. Many owners report capable handling in snow, though several emphasize that it cannot replace a dedicated winter tire and can struggle on ice or packed snow. Criticisms center on high pricing, added weight hurting fuel economy, mud packing, occasional tread chunking, and difficulties with balancing causing highway vibrations.
“I like mine so much I'm on my second set. I got 55k out of my first set (could have got another 10k but started to get a little noisy). Exact tire you have (265/70-17 C load) on a 2018 4Runner.”
“No opinion here between the Yokohamas or Falkens (both of which I would definitely put on my Outback ) but in my experience the BFG KOs are way too much tire for the Outback . I put a set of 4 on my 2013 Outback and quickly discovered that other than looking great, and being virtually bulletproof, everything else about them is a downside. Rough ride, lot of road noise, lost about 2 mpg in fuel cost, and very heavy when I did my tire rotations, which BFG says you should do every 3,000 miles to prevent excess wear. Like they say about many things, the two happiest days in my 2013 Outback ’s life were the day I put the KO2s on, and the day, after about 10,000 miles, I replaced them with “regular” tires . Great tires for a heavier vehicle, but too much for the relatively light Outback . I’ve read many Outback owner’s reviews being very happy with the Wildpeaks AND Geolanders. Sounds like that person has an agenda.”
“BFGoodrich KO2s are an excellent choice That is all. We got whacked with that big winter weather system here in Michigan last week. My '21 Sport is fitted with 235/75R15 KO2s and I finally got a feel for their cold/snow/ice performance characteristics. My opinion is favorable. They were good enough in 5-6" of loose powder, felt planted in melty slush, but mostly impressed me on glazed ice. Didn't encounter any hardpack snow, so can't really comment on how they'll do with that, but I expect they'll perform well on that surface also. I've been running at 38 psi, seems to work okay. Road noise is minimal. Fuel economy took a giant hit, though. I have no empirical measurements to back my observations, but it appears I've taken about an 8 MPG penalty. It only gets worse with speed, too. Highway miles eat even more gas than regular surface streets. Makes sense, given the nature of these tires. To be fair, however, I knew this would happen and accept the loss. For me and my goals with my Crosstrek build, the fuel economy loss is made up for with the improved grip under any road surface I've thrown at it yet. Just wanted to share my experience so far. I'm not disappointed. Read more”
Based on 395 community posts
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro AT2 | B · BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 33 | 49 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 13 - 15/32″ |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall - Raised White Lettering |
| Max pressure | — | 35 - 80 psi |
| Sizes in common | 25 | 25 |
Hankook Dynapro AT2
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2
Winner: BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 — better handling, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 69 vs 48 on handling.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 73 vs 55 on treadwear.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 70 vs 53 on comfort.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 73 vs 57 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 72 vs 59 on our wet score.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 73 vs 57 on our dry score.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 75 vs 61 on our snow score.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 70 vs 53 on our comfort score.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 73 vs 55 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology