Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Dynapro AT2 vs BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 217 + 1,575 owner reviews. How we score

All-Terrain T/A KO2 is ahead, 73–57

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Dynapro AT2
Tire AHankook

Dynapro AT2

All-Terrain tire

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 51 · 217 reviews

“New shoes for the Sunset Truck Hankook Dynapro AT2 Extremes in 30x9.5. Read more”

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2

All-Terrain T/A KO2

All-Terrain tire

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 1,575 reviews

“I like mine so much I'm on my second set. I got 55k out of my first set (could have got another 10k but started to get a little noisy). Exact tire you have (265/70-17 C load) on a 2018 4Runner.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 57

    Dry

    All-Terrain T/A KO2 +16
    73
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro AT2All-Terrain T/A KO2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online5175

    Dynapro AT2: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.7 = 57

    All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 73

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 59

    Wet

    All-Terrain T/A KO2 +13
    72
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro AT2All-Terrain T/A KO2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online5472

    Dynapro AT2: 60% × 61.7 (est.) + 40% × 54.3 = 59

    All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 72 = 72

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 61

    Snow

    All-Terrain T/A KO2 +14
    75
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro AT2All-Terrain T/A KO2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online5677

    Dynapro AT2: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 55.8 = 61

    All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 77.2 = 75

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 53

    Comfort

    All-Terrain T/A KO2 +17
    70
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro AT2All-Terrain T/A KO2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online4671

    Dynapro AT2: 40% × 64.8 (est.) + 60% × 45.6 = 53

    All-Terrain T/A KO2: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71 = 70

    No road tests of comfort for Dynapro AT2 or All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    69
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro AT2All-Terrain T/A KO2
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–73

    All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.6 = 69

    No road tests of noise for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 55

    Treadwear

    All-Terrain T/A KO2 +18
    73
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro AT2All-Terrain T/A KO2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online4877

    Dynapro AT2: 60% × 59.9 (est.) + 40% × 48.2 = 55

    All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 77.1 = 73

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 48

    Handling (owners)

    All-Terrain T/A KO2 +21
    69
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro AT2All-Terrain T/A KO2
    Reviews found online4869
Scores at a glance
Hankook Dynapro AT2 vs BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Dynapro AT2BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2
Relative Score 57 73
Dry 57 73
Wet 59 72
Snow 61 75
Comfort 53 70
Noise – 69
Treadwear 55 73
Handling (owners) 48 69

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Dynapro AT2

± 7

All-Terrain T/A KO2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Dynapro AT2

Pros

  • Comfortable ride quality on asphalt compared to standard summer or previous all-terrain models
  • Good traction and control in dry and wet weather conditions, including dependable trailer towing
  • Favorable fuel economy (MPGs) and low road noise for many users when new

Cons

  • Poor performance and lack of secure handling in snow, ice, and slush at highway speeds
  • Develops significant road noise or drumming as the tread wears down
  • Concerns regarding casing durability, including reports of premature cracking and vulnerability to gravel punctures
All owner themes in the Dynapro AT2 review

Tire B All-Terrain T/A KO2

Pros

  • Exceptional off-road traction and puncture resistance on rocks, gravel, and dirt
  • Aggressive, rugged aesthetics that enhance the look of trucks and SUVs
  • Impressive tread longevity and high mileage capabilities

Cons

  • Reduced grip and slippery performance in wet conditions, rain, and standing water
  • Rubber tends to harden over time, negatively impacting cold-weather and ice traction
  • Higher price point compared to some competitors
All owner themes in the All-Terrain T/A KO2 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Hankook Dynapro AT2

Mixed

Community sentiment regarding the Hankook Dynapro AT2 line is divided, heavily dependent on whether users evaluate the OEM factory tire or the retail/Xtreme version. The standard OEM AT2 receives notable criticism for lacking true all-terrain capability, poor wet/winter grip, and premature wear, while highway comfort and quietness are praised. In contrast, the Dynapro AT2 Xtreme variant receives widespread praise for strong snow traction, improved wet performance, durability, and quiet road manners.

Top themes
#OEM versus retail differences#Wet traction and braking#Winter and snow performance#Highway noise and comfort#Tread life and durability#Dynapro AT2 Xtreme upgrades

Based on 56 community posts

Tire B

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2

Positive

Community sentiment toward the BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 is largely positive, with drivers frequently praising its aggressive styling, tough sidewalls, off-road durability, and solid general performance. Many owners report capable handling in snow, though several emphasize that it cannot replace a dedicated winter tire and can struggle on ice or packed snow. Criticisms center on high pricing, added weight hurting fuel economy, mud packing, occasional tread chunking, and difficulties with balancing causing highway vibrations.

bobistheoilguy.com ·2021-11-30

“I like mine so much I'm on my second set. I got 55k out of my first set (could have got another 10k but started to get a little noisy). Exact tire you have (265/70-17 C load) on a 2018 4Runner.”

subaruoutback.org ·6 upvotes ·2022-09-17

“No opinion here between the Yokohamas or Falkens (both of which I would definitely put on my Outback ) but in my experience the BFG KOs are way too much tire for the Outback . I put a set of 4 on my 2013 Outback and quickly discovered that other than looking great, and being virtually bulletproof, everything else about them is a downside. Rough ride, lot of road noise, lost about 2 mpg in fuel cost, and very heavy when I did my tire rotations, which BFG says you should do every 3,000 miles to prevent excess wear. Like they say about many things, the two happiest days in my 2013 Outback ’s life were the day I put the KO2s on, and the day, after about 10,000 miles, I replaced them with “regular” tires . Great tires for a heavier vehicle, but too much for the relatively light Outback . I’ve read many Outback owner’s reviews being very happy with the Wildpeaks AND Geolanders. Sounds like that person has an agenda.”

r/Crosstrek ·5 upvotes ·2022-02-09

“BFGoodrich KO2s are an excellent choice That is all. We got whacked with that big winter weather system here in Michigan last week. My '21 Sport is fitted with 235/75R15 KO2s and I finally got a feel for their cold/snow/ice performance characteristics. My opinion is favorable. They were good enough in 5-6" of loose powder, felt planted in melty slush, but mostly impressed me on glazed ice. Didn't encounter any hardpack snow, so can't really comment on how they'll do with that, but I expect they'll perform well on that surface also. I've been running at 38 psi, seems to work okay. Road noise is minimal. Fuel economy took a giant hit, though. I have no empirical measurements to back my observations, but it appears I've taken about an 8 MPG penalty. It only gets worse with speed, too. Highway miles eat even more gas than regular surface streets. Makes sense, given the nature of these tires. To be fair, however, I knew this would happen and accept the loss. For me and my goals with my Crosstrek build, the fuel economy loss is made up for with the improved grip under any road surface I've thrown at it yet. Just wanted to share my experience so far. I'm not disappointed. Read more”

Top themes
#aggressive look#winter and snow traction#sidewall durability#balancing and vibrations#road noise levels#fuel economy impact#tread wear life

Based on 395 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Dynapro AT2 B · BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2
CategoryAll-Terrain tireAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available3349
Rim diameters15″ – 20″15″ – 20″
Tread depth—13 - 15/32″
Treadwear warranty—50,000 mi
Sidewall—Black Side Wall - Raised White Lettering
Max pressure—35 - 80 psi
Sizes in common2525

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Dynapro AT2

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2

Winner: BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 — better handling, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 69 vs 48 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 73 vs 55 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 70 vs 53 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 73 vs 57 on dry.

Tire A · Hankook Dynapro AT2
Tire B · BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dynapro AT2 or All-Terrain T/A KO2?

Which is better in the wet, Dynapro AT2 or All-Terrain T/A KO2?

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 72 vs 59 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro AT2 or All-Terrain T/A KO2?

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 73 vs 57 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Dynapro AT2 or All-Terrain T/A KO2?

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 75 vs 61 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Dynapro AT2 or All-Terrain T/A KO2?

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 70 vs 53 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Dynapro AT2 or All-Terrain T/A KO2?

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 73 vs 55 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology