Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 7 reviews
BFGoodrich A/T KO2 vs Yokohama G012 A/T — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
G012 A/T is ahead, 72–58
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
59
Dry
G012 A/T +1372Why this score
Source A/T KO2 G012 A/T Reviews found online 55 75 -
59
Wet
G012 A/T +1675Why this score
Source A/T KO2 G012 A/T Reviews found online 55 77 -
60
Comfort
G012 A/T +767Why this score
Source A/T KO2 G012 A/T Reviews found online 51 66 -
63
Treadwear
G012 A/T +871Why this score
Source A/T KO2 G012 A/T Reviews found online 61 75 -
47
Handling
G012 A/T +2774Why this score
Source A/T KO2 G012 A/T Reviews found online 47 74
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich A/T KO2 | Yokohama G012 A/T |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 58 | 72 |
| Dry | 59 | 72 |
| Wet | 59 | 75 |
| Comfort | 60 | 67 |
| Treadwear | 63 | 71 |
| Handling | 47 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
A/T KO2
G012 A/T
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A A/T KO2
Pros
- Exceptional durability and long tread life, holding up well over years and extreme temperatures
- Strong off-road performance in mud, rocks, and sand with reliable sidewall strength when aired down
- Aggressive, appealing visual styling ('badass' look)
Cons
- Increased road noise during daily city driving
- Less than optimal comfort on-road
- Compromised performance and grip in wet on-road conditions
Tire B G012 A/T
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and long-term durability, with some users reporting up to 90,000 km and more
- Strong off-road capability with solid shoulders and reliable performance on unsealed roads, farm tracks, mud, and sand
- Excellent snow and winter weather performance, greatly enhancing 4WD and AWD capabilities
Cons
- Reduced traction requiring extra caution during the initial onset of rain on wet roads
- Stiffness in temperatures below 2 degrees Celsius affecting cold-weather and snow handling
- Slight compromises in road noise and fuel consumption compared to standard road tires
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich A/T KO2 | B · Yokohama G012 A/T |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires |
| Vehicle type | — | SUV and 4x4 |
Which one should you actually buy?
BFGoodrich A/T KO2
Yokohama G012 A/T
Winner: Yokohama G012 A/T — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Yokohama G012 A/T scores 74 vs 47 on handling.
Yokohama G012 A/T scores 75 vs 59 on wet.
Yokohama G012 A/T scores 72 vs 59 on dry.
Yokohama G012 A/T scores 71 vs 63 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.