tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S vs Goodyear Eagle LS-2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 1 + 146 owner reviews. How we score

g-Force COMP-2 A/S is ahead, 70–57

Check price on Amazon · g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Eagle LS-2 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
Tire ABFGoodrich

g-Force COMP-2 A/S

Ultra High Performance All Season tire

± 8Provisional

Tests – · 1 test Owners 68 · 1 review

Best test result: #2 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Goodyear Eagle LS-2
Tire BGoodyear

Eagle LS-2

All Season

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 146 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 70

    Dry

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S +14
    56
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SEagle LS-2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online7149

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 70

    Eagle LS-2: 60% × 60.2 (est.) + 40% × 49.4 = 56

    No road tests of dry for g-Force COMP-2 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Eagle LS-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 71

    Wet

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S +10
    61
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SEagle LS-2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online7157

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 71.4 = 71

    Eagle LS-2: 60% × 63.3 (est.) + 40% × 57.3 = 61

    No road tests of wet for g-Force COMP-2 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Eagle LS-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    60
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SEagle LS-2
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online–54

    Eagle LS-2: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 53.5 = 60

    No road tests of snow for Eagle LS-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 68

    Comfort

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S +10
    58
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SEagle LS-2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6752

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 40% × 68.8 (est.) + 60% × 67.2 = 68

    Eagle LS-2: 40% × 66.1 (est.) + 60% × 52.4 = 58

    No road tests of comfort for g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Eagle LS-2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    63
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SEagle LS-2
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–57

    Eagle LS-2: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 56.8 = 63

    No road tests of noise for Eagle LS-2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 70

    Treadwear

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S +15
    55
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SEagle LS-2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests77≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online6048

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 77.1 + 40% × 59.6 = 70

    Eagle LS-2: 60% × 59.8 (est.) + 40% × 47.9 = 55

    No road tests of treadwear for Eagle LS-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 69

    Handling (owners)

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S +20
    49
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SEagle LS-2
    Reviews found online6949
Scores at a glance
CategoryBFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/SGoodyear Eagle LS-2
Relative Score 70 57
Dry 70 56
Wet 71 61
Snow – 60
Comfort 68 58
Noise – 63
Treadwear 70 55
Handling (owners) 69 49

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

g-Force COMP-2 A/S

± 8

Eagle LS-2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A g-Force COMP-2 A/S

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Eagle LS-2

Pros

  • Low road noise and exceptional ride comfort
  • Precise dry handling and solid straight-line stability
  • Good overall value and fuel efficiency

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear and shorter lifespan for some drivers
  • Increased road noise over time due to cupping
  • Mediocre wet and winter traction when worn
All owner themes in the Eagle LS-2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S B · Goodyear Eagle LS-2
CategoryUltra High Performance All Season tireAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—22
Rim diameters—15″ – 20″
Tread depth9 - 10/32″9 - 12/32″
UTQG400 AA A360 - 400 A A - B
Treadwear warranty45,000 mi—
SidewallBlack Side WallBlack Side Wall - Vertical Serrated Band
Max pressure50 - 51 psi44 - 51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S

Goodyear Eagle LS-2

Winner: BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S — better handling, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 69 vs 49 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 70 vs 55 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 70 vs 56 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 71 vs 61 on wet.

Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Goodyear Eagle LS-2
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Eagle LS-2?

Which is better in the wet, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Eagle LS-2?

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S, 71 vs 61 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Eagle LS-2?

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S, 70 vs 56 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Eagle LS-2?

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S, 68 vs 58 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Eagle LS-2?

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S, 70 vs 55 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology