Tests – · 1 test Owners 67 · 1 review
Best test result: #2 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Head-to-head
Updated
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S vs Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 1 road tests and 1 + 658 owner reviews. How we score
Pilot Sport A/S 3+ leads, 72–70 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 69 · 658 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))
“Just had these Pilot Sport A/S 3+ installed to replace OEM Dunlops”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
Pilot Sport A/S 3+ +474Why this score
Source g-Force COMP-2 A/S Pilot Sport A/S 3+ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 71 77 g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 70.8 = 70
Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 71.8 (est.) + 40% × 77.3 = 74
No road tests of dry for g-Force COMP-2 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Pilot Sport A/S 3+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
71
Wet
Pilot Sport A/S 3+ +778Why this score
Source g-Force COMP-2 A/S Pilot Sport A/S 3+ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 76 (est.) Reviews found online 71 80 g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 71 (est.) + 40% × 71.2 = 71
Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 75.9 (est.) + 40% × 80.1 = 78
No road tests of wet for g-Force COMP-2 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Pilot Sport A/S 3+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison60Why this score
Source g-Force COMP-2 A/S Pilot Sport A/S 3+ Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online – 53 Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 64.8 (est.) + 40% × 52.5 = 60
No road tests of snow for Pilot Sport A/S 3+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
67
Comfort
g-Force COMP-2 A/S +463Why this score
Source g-Force COMP-2 A/S Pilot Sport A/S 3+ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 67 60 g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 40% × 68.3 (est.) + 60% × 66.5 = 67
Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 40% × 67 (est.) + 60% × 60 = 63
No road tests of comfort for g-Force COMP-2 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Pilot Sport A/S 3+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
70
Treadwear
g-Force COMP-2 A/S +169Why this score
Source g-Force COMP-2 A/S Pilot Sport A/S 3+ Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 77 73 Reviews found online 60 64 Tested Tread Life (Miles) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 87% 73% g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 77 + 40% × 59.8 = 70
Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 72.5 + 40% × 63.5 = 69
-
69
Handling (owners)
g-Force COMP-2 A/S +267Why this score
Source g-Force COMP-2 A/S Pilot Sport A/S 3+ Reviews found online 69 67
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S | Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 72 |
| Dry | 70 | 74 |
| Wet | 71 | 78 |
| Snow | – | 60 |
| Comfort | 67 | 63 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | 69 | 67 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
70
/ 100
g-Force COMP-2 A/S
72
/ 100
Pilot Sport A/S 3+
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S finished ahead 0 times and Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ 1 times.
| Discipline | Category | g-Force COMP-2 A/S | Pilot Sport A/S 3+ | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tested Tread Life (Miles) | Treadwear | 87% | 73% | +13.4 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires · 225/40R18 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #4/19 | #2/19 | – | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires · 225/40R18 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A g-Force COMP-2 A/S
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Pilot Sport A/S 3+
Pros
- Dry and wet grip, cornering, and steering response, with many reviewers describing it as close to a summer tire. Wet traction and hydroplaning resistance are especially praised.
- Large improvement over OEM tires (Pirelli, Bridgestone, Goodyear, Dunlop, Continental) and especially over run-flats, with better ride, handling and often less noise.
- Good light-snow and cold-weather capability for an ultra-high-performance all-season tire, which lets owners avoid separate summer and winter sets.
Cons
- Premature treadwear is the most common complaint. Many report 10k–25k miles, rear tires and staggered setups wearing fastest, and some cases of tread chunking, flaking, cracking or dry rot. Many call the 45k warranty unrealistic.
- Road noise, including humming, droning or roaring around 60–75 mph. It often worsens with wear, and some reviewers say it is among the loudest tires they have owned.
- Weak snow and ice traction for some owners. Some describe it as unsafe, especially in deeper snow or on RWD cars, and say it falls short of the marketed winter rating.
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+
Community members widely praise the Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ for its dry handling, wet grip, and substantial improvement in ride comfort over stock tires. However, several users express reservations about its poor traction in genuine snow conditions and note that road noise can become prominent as the tread wears. It is frequently compared against competitors like the Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 as well as its successor, the Pilot Sport All Season 4.
bobistheoilguy.com
·2 upvotes ·2024-03-01
“Slam me if you must, but I bought the Falken Azenis FK460 A/S in size 255-40x19 for my 2016 Mustang GT, based largely on Tire Rack testing and their customer comments. First thing I noticed was they are quieter than my old Michelin Pilot Sport A/S3+ tires, which were noisy when new and got worse. Also, the rear tires don't want to slip out like the Michelins when I get on the gas through a tight turn. However, the Michelins had been on the car for >6 years and 27K miles. But other than than the two categories above, it's hard for me to discern a lot of difference. Maybe it's only in my head, but perhaps the Michelins were a bit more responsive to quick motions at the steering wheel. I have no idea how well the Falkens will perform after 20K miles, but for me that's probably 4 years from now. Fair or not, I shied away from the Contis because I had read about balancing issues on a couple websites.”
r/WRX
·28 upvotes ·2017-12-19
“Just had these Pilot Sport A/S 3+ installed to replace OEM Dunlops”
r/GolfGTI
·4 upvotes ·2020-02-14
“Pilot Sport A/S 3+ Tires just installed Just got the tires on this morning with an alignment and proper balancing. Holy cow, night and day difference from the original Bridgestones on the car. Car handles so much better. It honestly makes me feel like I just bought a new car. If you have any questions or are considering getting them, feel free to ask!”
Top themes
#Dry cornering grip#Wet traction performance#Snow traction limitations#Road noise over time#Ride comfort comparison#Balancing and tire pressure#Comparison to Continental DWS
Based on 47 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S | B · Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Ultra High Performance All Season tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 9 - 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 400 AA A | 500 AA A |
| Treadwear warranty | 45,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
70
/ 100
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
72
/ 100
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+
Narrow edge: Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ — better wet and dry. Pick the BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S if comfort matters most to you. BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ scores 78 vs 71 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 67 vs 63 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ scores 74 vs 70 on dry.
Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Pilot Sport A/S 3+?
Which is better in the wet, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Pilot Sport A/S 3+?
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+, 78 vs 71 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Pilot Sport A/S 3+?
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+, 74 vs 70 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Pilot Sport A/S 3+?
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S, 67 vs 63 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Pilot Sport A/S 3+?
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 69 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology