Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S vs Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 1 road tests and 1 + 655 owner reviews. How we score

Pilot Sport A/S 3+ leads, 74–70 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S

g-Force COMP-2 A/S

Ultra High Performance All Season tire

± 8Provisional

Tests – · 1 test Owners 68 · 1 review

Best test result: #2 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+
Tire BMichelin

Pilot Sport A/S 3+

All Season

± 7

Tests – · 1 test Owners 72 · 655 reviews

Best test result: #6 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“Just had these Pilot Sport A/S 3+ installed to replace OEM Dunlops”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 70

    Dry

    Pilot Sport A/S 3+ +5
    75
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SPilot Sport A/S 3+
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online7179

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 70

    Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 78.6 = 75

    No road tests of dry for g-Force COMP-2 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Pilot Sport A/S 3+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 71

    Wet

    Pilot Sport A/S 3+ +8
    79
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SPilot Sport A/S 3+
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 77 (est.)
    Reviews found online7182

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 71.4 = 71

    Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 77 (est.) + 40% × 82.1 = 79

    No road tests of wet for g-Force COMP-2 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Pilot Sport A/S 3+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    63
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SPilot Sport A/S 3+
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online–58

    Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 57.9 = 63

    No road tests of snow for Pilot Sport A/S 3+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 68

    Comfort

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S +3
    65
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SPilot Sport A/S 3+
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6763

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 40% × 68.8 (est.) + 60% × 67.2 = 68

    Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 62.8 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Pilot Sport A/S 3+. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Treadwear

    Level
    70
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SPilot Sport A/S 3+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests7773
    Reviews found online6066
    Tested Tread Life (Miles) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–087%73%

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 77.1 + 40% × 59.6 = 70

    Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 72.5 + 40% × 66.1 = 70

  6. 69

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Sport A/S 3+ +1
    70
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SPilot Sport A/S 3+
    Reviews found online6970
Scores at a glance
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S vs Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/SMichelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+
Relative Score 70 74
Dry 70 75
Wet 71 79
Snow – 63
Comfort 68 65
Treadwear 70 70
Handling (owners) 69 70

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

g-Force COMP-2 A/S

± 7

Pilot Sport A/S 3+

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S finished ahead 0 times and Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ 1 times.

DisciplineCategoryg-Force COMP-2 A/SPilot Sport A/S 3+ΔHead-to-head
Tested Tread Life (Miles) Treadwear 87% 73% +13.4 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires · 225/40R18
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #4/19 #2/19 – 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires · 225/40R18

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A g-Force COMP-2 A/S

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Pilot Sport A/S 3+

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and cornering stability in both dry and wet conditions
  • Crisp, highly responsive steering and handling feel
  • Substantial upgrade in performance and wet weather confidence compared to OEM tires

Cons

  • Significantly faster tread wear than expected, often failing to reach the mileage warranty
  • High levels of road noise, buzzing, and droning that increase noticeably as the tread wears down
  • Stiff sidewalls leading to a harsher, less comfortable ride over bumps and road imperfections
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport A/S 3+ review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+

Positive

Community members widely praise the Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ for its dry handling, wet grip, and substantial improvement in ride comfort over stock tires. However, several users express reservations about its poor traction in genuine snow conditions and note that road noise can become prominent as the tread wears. It is frequently compared against competitors like the Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 as well as its successor, the Pilot Sport All Season 4.

Top themes
#Dry cornering grip#Wet traction performance#Snow traction limitations#Road noise over time#Ride comfort comparison#Balancing and tire pressure#Comparison to Continental DWS

Based on 47 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S B · Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+
CategoryUltra High Performance All Season tireAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth9 - 10/32″—
UTQG400 AA A—
Treadwear warranty45,000 mi—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+

Narrow edge: Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ — better wet and dry. Pick the BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S if comfort matters most to you. BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ scores 79 vs 71 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ scores 75 vs 70 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 68 vs 65 on comfort.

Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Pilot Sport A/S 3+?

Which is better in the wet, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Pilot Sport A/S 3+?

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+, 79 vs 71 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Pilot Sport A/S 3+?

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+, 75 vs 70 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Pilot Sport A/S 3+?

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S, 68 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Pilot Sport A/S 3+?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 70 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology