Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S vs Firestone Firehawk AS — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 1 + 8 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: g-Force COMP-2 A/S 70, Firehawk AS 69.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S

g-Force COMP-2 A/S

Ultra High Performance All Season tire

± 8Provisional

Tests – · 1 test Owners 67 · 1 review

Best test result: #2 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Firestone Firehawk AS
Tire BFirestone

Firehawk AS

All Season High Performance tires

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 8 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 70

    Dry

    Level
    70
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SFirehawk AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7171

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 70.8 = 70

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 70

    No road tests of dry for g-Force COMP-2 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 71

    Wet

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S +2
    69
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SFirehawk AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7168

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 70.9 (est.) + 40% × 71.1 = 71

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 69

    No road tests of wet for g-Force COMP-2 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    66
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SFirehawk AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online–62

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 62.4 = 66

    No road tests of snow for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 67

    Comfort

    Firehawk AS +2
    69
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SFirehawk AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6769

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 40% × 68.2 (est.) + 60% × 66.5 = 67

    Firehawk AS: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 68.8 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for g-Force COMP-2 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    70
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SFirehawk AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online–74

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 70

    No road tests of noise for Firehawk AS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 70

    Treadwear

    Level
    70
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SFirehawk AS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests77≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6072

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 77 + 40% × 59.7 = 70

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 70

    No road tests of treadwear for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 69

    Handling (owners)

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S +2
    67
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SFirehawk AS
    Reviews found online6967
Scores at a glance
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S vs Firestone Firehawk AS: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/SFirestone Firehawk AS
Relative Score 70 69
Dry 70 70
Wet 71 69
Snow – 66
Comfort 67 69
Noise – 70
Treadwear 70 70
Handling (owners) 69 67

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

g-Force COMP-2 A/S

± 8

Firehawk AS

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A g-Force COMP-2 A/S

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Firehawk AS

Pros

  • Exceptionally quiet and smooth ride quality
  • Strong dry handling and improved cornering response
  • Good water dispersion and wet road performance for most users

Cons

  • Potential susceptibility to hydroplaning in heavy rain according to select reviewers
  • Requires proper balancing to prevent irregular tread wear
All owner themes in the Firehawk AS review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S B · Firestone Firehawk AS
CategoryUltra High Performance All Season tireAll Season High Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—5
Rim diameters—15″ – 18″
Tread depth9 - 10/32″11/32″
UTQG400 AA A480 A A
Treadwear warranty45,000 mi50,000 mi
SidewallBlack Side WallBlackwall
Max pressure50 - 51 psi44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S

Firestone Firehawk AS

Too close to call: BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S and Firestone Firehawk AS are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional. Firestone Firehawk AS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
Tire B · Firestone Firehawk AS

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Firehawk AS?

Which is better in the wet, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Firehawk AS?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 69 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Firehawk AS?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 70 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Firehawk AS?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 69 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Firehawk AS?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 70 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology