Tests 65 · 1 test Owners 61 · 80 reviews
Best test result: #3 of 7 in 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test (dry handling long run)
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 1 road tests and 80 + 187 owner reviews. How we score
G Force Rival S 1.5 is ahead, 64–57
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 65 · 1 test Owners 61 · 80 reviews
Best test result: #3 of 7 in 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test (dry handling long run)
Tests 72 · 1 test Owners 50 · 187 reviews
Best test result: #4 of 11 in 2022 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test (dry handling)
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | G Force Rival S 1.5 | Ecsta V730 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests | 61 | 72 |
| Reviews found online | 78 | 76 |
G Force Rival S 1.5: 60% × 61.1 + 40% × 77.8 = 68
Ecsta V730: 60% × 71.6 + 40% × 76.3 = 73
| Source | G Force Rival S 1.5 | Ecsta V730 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 69 | ≈ 44 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 48 | 21 |
G Force Rival S 1.5: 60% × 69.4 + 40% × 48 = 61
Ecsta V730: 60% × 43.8 (est.) + 40% × 21.4 = 35
No road tests of wet for Ecsta V730. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | G Force Rival S 1.5 | Ecsta V730 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | ≈ 59 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | – | 35 |
Ecsta V730: 60% × 59.3 (est.) + 40% × 35.1 = 50
No road tests of snow for Ecsta V730. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | G Force Rival S 1.5 | Ecsta V730 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 66 | ≈ 64 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 54 | 45 |
G Force Rival S 1.5: 40% × 65.7 + 60% × 53.6 = 58
Ecsta V730: 40% × 64 (est.) + 60% × 45.3 = 53
No road tests of comfort for Ecsta V730. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
| Source | G Force Rival S 1.5 | Ecsta V730 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 62 | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 66 (est.) | 61 |
G Force Rival S 1.5: 60% × 62.4 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 64
Ecsta V730: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 61.1 = 64
No owner ratings of noise for G Force Rival S 1.5. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
No road tests of noise for Ecsta V730. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | G Force Rival S 1.5 | Ecsta V730 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 63 (est.) | ≈ 62 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 55 | 55 |
G Force Rival S 1.5: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 55.4 = 60
Ecsta V730: 60% × 62.2 (est.) + 40% × 54.6 = 59
No road tests of treadwear for G Force Rival S 1.5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta V730. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | G Force Rival S 1.5 | Ecsta V730 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 74 | 69 |
| Category | BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5 | Kumho Ecsta V730 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 64 | 57 |
| Dry | 68 | 73 |
| Wet | 61 | 35 |
| Snow | – | 50 |
| Comfort | 58 | 53 |
| Noise | 64 | 64 |
| Treadwear | 60 | 59 |
| Handling (owners) | 74 | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
G Force Rival S 1.5
Ecsta V730
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | G Force Rival S 1.5 | Ecsta V730 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Handling | Dry | 100% #5/7 · 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test | 99% #4/11 · 2022 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #3/7 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test | #4/11 2022 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5 | B · Kumho Ecsta V730 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 6 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 19″ |
| Tread depth | — | 8.5/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 200 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5
Kumho Ecsta V730
Winner: BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5 — better wet and comfort. Pick the Kumho Ecsta V730 if dry matters most to you.
BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5 scores 61 vs 35 on wet.
BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5 scores 58 vs 53 on comfort.
Kumho Ecsta V730 scores 73 vs 68 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5, 61 vs 35 on our wet score.
Kumho Ecsta V730, 73 vs 68 on our dry score.
Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 64 on the noise score, within 3 points.
BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5, 58 vs 53 on our comfort score.
Neither, by our numbers: 60 vs 59 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology