Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama ADVAN A052 vs BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 5 + 1 road tests and 213 + 80 owner reviews. How we score

ADVAN A052 is ahead, 72–64

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama ADVAN A052
Tire AYokohama

ADVAN A052

Summer

± 5

Tests 76 · 5 tests Owners 68 · 213 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 7 in 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test (dry handling (tester's mark))

“Staggered BBSs Need Tires I have a set of BBS wheels that i have been restoring for my 89 944 NA. I am trying to figure out what tires to get and am running into a bit of trouble. The set of BBSs are 15in staggered. The front are 8in wide and the rear are 9in wide. When i had purchased these wheels they had 215/60R15s all around. Would this be a good fitment? I am hoping the rear will not look stretched. As i was researching staggered tires i ran into problems finding a matching set in the sizes 225 50R15 and 205 55R15. A local shop helped me find these for the front Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 (205 55R15) and these for the rear Yokohama ADVAN A052 (225 50R15). Im concerned to get these due to the tread pattern being drastically different. Another shop has Kumho Ecsta 4x KU22 picked out for the front. I would like to have performance summer tires that do not break the bank. If i were to do 215/60R15s all around i was looking at Falken Sincera SN250 A/S (which are not performance) or Vredestein Sprint Classic which i am not sure of. I am a bit at a loss here and would greatly appreciate any advice or help selecting tires as this is not something i am comfortable with given the lack of options at this wheel size.”

BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5
± 9

Tests 65 · 1 test Owners 61 · 80 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 7 in 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test (dry handling long run)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 80

    Dry

    ADVAN A052 +12
    68
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN A052G Force Rival S 1.5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 1 tests7461
    Reviews found online9078
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–098%93%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–199%100%
    Dry Handling Long Run (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–199%100%
    Dry Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0100%91%

    ADVAN A052: 60% × 73.6 + 40% × 89.9 = 80

    G Force Rival S 1.5: 60% × 61.1 + 40% × 77.8 = 68

  2. 73

    Wet

    ADVAN A052 +12
    61
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN A052G Force Rival S 1.5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 1 tests7869
    Reviews found online6748
    Wet Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–091%81%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–190%91%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0100%96%

    ADVAN A052: 60% × 77.8 + 40% × 67 = 73

    G Force Rival S 1.5: 60% × 69.4 + 40% × 48 = 61

  3. 73

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN A052G Force Rival S 1.5
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)–
    Reviews found online74–

    ADVAN A052: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 73.9 = 73

    No road tests of snow for ADVAN A052. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 67

    Comfort

    ADVAN A052 +9
    58
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN A052G Force Rival S 1.5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests7466
    Reviews found online6354
    Comfort (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0100%92%

    ADVAN A052: 40% × 74.1 + 60% × 62.6 = 67

    G Force Rival S 1.5: 40% × 65.7 + 60% × 53.6 = 58

  5. 77

    Noise

    ADVAN A052 +13
    64
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN A052G Force Rival S 1.5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests7762
    Reviews found online77≈ 66 (est.)
    Noise (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0100%80%

    ADVAN A052: 60% × 76.8 + 40% × 76.5 = 77

    G Force Rival S 1.5: 60% × 62.4 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 64

    No owner ratings of noise for G Force Rival S 1.5. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 50

    Treadwear

    G Force Rival S 1.5 +10
    60
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN A052G Force Rival S 1.5
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 57 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online4055

    ADVAN A052: 60% × 56.8 (est.) + 40% × 39.5 = 50

    G Force Rival S 1.5: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 55.4 = 60

    No road tests of treadwear for ADVAN A052. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for G Force Rival S 1.5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 84

    Handling (owners)

    ADVAN A052 +10
    74
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN A052G Force Rival S 1.5
    Reviews found online8474
Scores at a glance
Yokohama ADVAN A052 vs BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryYokohama ADVAN A052BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5
Relative Score 72 64
Dry 80 68
Wet 73 61
Snow 73 –
Comfort 67 58
Noise 77 64
Treadwear 50 60
Handling (owners) 84 74

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

ADVAN A052

± 9

G Force Rival S 1.5

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Yokohama ADVAN A052 finished ahead 0 times and BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5 1 times.

DisciplineCategoryADVAN A052G Force Rival S 1.5ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 98% 93% +4.7 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test · 275/35 R18
Dry Handling Dry 99% 100% −0.5 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test · 275/35 R18
Dry Handling (tester's mark) Dry 100% 91% +8.6 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test · 275/35 R18
Dry Handling Long Run Dry 99% 100% −0.7 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test · 275/35 R18
Wet Braking Wet 90% 91% −1.3 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test · 275/35 R18
Wet Handling Wet 100% 96% +3.4 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test · 275/35 R18
Wet Handling (tester's mark) Wet 91% 81% +9.3 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test · 275/35 R18
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 100% 92% +8.3 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test · 275/35 R18
Noise (tester's mark) Noise 100% 80% +20.0 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test · 275/35 R18
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #5/7 #3/7 – 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test · 275/35 R18

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ADVAN A052

Pros

  • Class-leading dry grip and traction, often compared to dedicated racing slicks.
  • Rapid warm-up time, providing peak performance almost immediately.
  • Surprisingly high levels of wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance for a performance tire.

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear, especially when used on heavy vehicles or without aggressive camber settings.
  • Tendency to 'grease up' or lose performance during long, high-intensity track sessions.
  • Soft sidewall construction can lead to vague steering feel or 'sponginess' compared to stiffer competitors.
All owner themes in the ADVAN A052 review

Tire B G Force Rival S 1.5

Pros

  • Exceptional dry traction and lateral grip
  • Rapid warm-up, making it ideal for short-duration autocross
  • Superior tread life and durability compared to other 200TW competitors

Cons

  • Performance degrades significantly in wet or cold conditions
  • Tendency to overheat and lose grip ('grease up') during long track sessions
  • Increased road noise and tendency to tramline on public roads
All owner themes in the G Force Rival S 1.5 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Yokohama ADVAN A052

Positive

The community regards the Yokohama ADVAN A052 as a top-tier, high-performance competition tire that offers exceptional dry grip and competitive edge in autocross and track settings. Users frequently compare them favorably against other extreme performance tires like the Bridgestone RE-71R/RE-71RS, though questions remain regarding their longevity for long-distance road trips.

Top themes
#exceptional dry grip#autocross and track performance#tire longevity and wear#comparison with bridgestone#tire sizing and fitment

Based on 12 community posts

Tire B

BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama ADVAN A052 B · BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available61—
Rim diameters13″ – 20″—
Tread depth7/32″—
UTQG200 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama ADVAN A052

BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5

Winner: Yokohama ADVAN A052 — better noise, dry and wet. Pick the BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5 if treadwear matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 77 vs 64 on noise.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 80 vs 68 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 73 vs 61 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 84 vs 74 on handling.

Tire A · Yokohama ADVAN A052
Tire B · BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ADVAN A052 or G Force Rival S 1.5?

Which is better in the wet, ADVAN A052 or G Force Rival S 1.5?

Yokohama ADVAN A052, 73 vs 61 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ADVAN A052 or G Force Rival S 1.5?

Yokohama ADVAN A052, 80 vs 68 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, ADVAN A052 or G Force Rival S 1.5?

Yokohama ADVAN A052, 77 vs 64 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, ADVAN A052 or G Force Rival S 1.5?

Yokohama ADVAN A052, 67 vs 58 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ADVAN A052 or G Force Rival S 1.5?

BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5, 60 vs 50 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology