Tests 73 · 3 tests Owners 66 · 9 reviews
Best test result: #3 of 10 in 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test (dry handling)
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 3 + 5 road tests and 9 + 213 owner reviews. How we score
ADVAN A052 leads, 72–70 Narrow edge
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 3 tests Owners 66 · 9 reviews
Best test result: #3 of 10 in 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test (dry handling)
Tests 76 · 5 tests Owners 68 · 213 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 7 in 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test (dry handling (tester's mark))
“Staggered BBSs Need Tires I have a set of BBS wheels that i have been restoring for my 89 944 NA. I am trying to figure out what tires to get and am running into a bit of trouble. The set of BBSs are 15in staggered. The front are 8in wide and the rear are 9in wide. When i had purchased these wheels they had 215/60R15s all around. Would this be a good fitment? I am hoping the rear will not look stretched. As i was researching staggered tires i ran into problems finding a matching set in the sizes 225 50R15 and 205 55R15. A local shop helped me find these for the front Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 (205 55R15) and these for the rear Yokohama ADVAN A052 (225 50R15). Im concerned to get these due to the tread pattern being drastically different. Another shop has Kumho Ecsta 4x KU22 picked out for the front. I would like to have performance summer tires that do not break the bank. If i were to do 215/60R15s all around i was looking at Falken Sincera SN250 A/S (which are not performance) or Vredestein Sprint Classic which i am not sure of. I am a bit at a loss here and would greatly appreciate any advice or help selecting tires as this is not something i am comfortable with given the lack of options at this wheel size.”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect | ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 5 tests | 74 | 74 |
| Reviews found online | 76 | 90 |
| Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 99% | 99% |
Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect: 60% × 73.6 + 40% × 75.6 = 74
ADVAN A052: 60% × 73.6 + 40% × 89.9 = 80
| Source | Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect | ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 4 tests | 74 | 78 |
| Reviews found online | 68 | 67 |
Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect: 60% × 73.7 + 40% × 68.4 = 72
ADVAN A052: 60% × 77.8 + 40% × 67 = 73
| Source | Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect | ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | ≈ 72 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | – | 74 |
ADVAN A052: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 73.9 = 73
No road tests of snow for ADVAN A052. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect | ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests | ≈ 68 (est.) | 74 |
| Reviews found online | 66 | 63 |
Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect: 40% × 68.1 (est.) + 60% × 65.8 = 67
ADVAN A052: 40% × 74.1 + 60% × 62.6 = 67
No road tests of comfort for Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
| Source | Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect | ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests | 70 | 77 |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 66 (est.) | 77 |
Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect: 60% × 70 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 69
ADVAN A052: 60% × 76.8 + 40% × 76.5 = 77
No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect | ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 62 (est.) | ≈ 57 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 53 | 40 |
Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 53.4 = 58
ADVAN A052: 60% × 56.8 (est.) + 40% × 39.5 = 50
No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for ADVAN A052. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect | ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 74 | 84 |
| Source | Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect | ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 67 | – |
| Category | Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect | Yokohama ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 72 |
| Dry | 74 | 80 |
| Wet | 72 | 73 |
| Snow | – | 73 |
| Comfort | 67 | 67 |
| Noise | 69 | 77 |
| Treadwear | 58 | 50 |
| Handling (owners) | 74 | 84 |
| Efficiency | 67 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect
ADVAN A052
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect finished ahead 0 times and Yokohama ADVAN A052 1 times.
| Discipline | Category | Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect | ADVAN A052 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 94% #9/10 · 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test | 93% #5/5 · 2026 AutoBild Track Day Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% | 99% | −0.5 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 73% #8/10 · 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test | 100% #1/5 · 2026 AutoBild Track Day Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 93% #8/10 · 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test | 100% #1/5 · 2026 AutoBild Track Day Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #8/11 | #5/11 | – | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
The community regards the Yokohama ADVAN A052 as a top-tier, high-performance competition tire that offers exceptional dry grip and competitive edge in autocross and track settings. Users frequently compare them favorably against other extreme performance tires like the Bridgestone RE-71R/RE-71RS, though questions remain regarding their longevity for long-distance road trips.
“Long trip with Advans A052? I'm planning a trip to the Nürburgring to attend a trackday this October. The problem is that I live 1300 km away, so the tyres should be able to cope with that, some 20 laps at medium-fast pace at the Nordschleife, and the drive back home. Are the Advan A052 tyres way to soft for such a long trip? Will they last? Wouldn't it be wiser to settle for a more conservative set of Michelins PS4? The car is a 1986 Porsche 911 Carrera, 1210 kg... Read more”
“I went with Yokohama ADVAN A052 225/45/17s for AUTOx They are more expensive but they are definitely lighter than the N2s...20.6#s vs ~25#s from what I found on the internet.”
“Yokohama ADVAN A052 315/30R18 and 265/35R18 - BEEFY!”
Based on 12 community posts
| Attribute | A · Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect | B · Yokohama ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 61 |
| Rim diameters | — | 13″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 7/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 200 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect
Yokohama ADVAN A052
Narrow edge: Yokohama ADVAN A052 — better handling, noise and dry. Pick the Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect if treadwear matters most to you.
Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 84 vs 74 on handling.
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect scores 58 vs 50 on treadwear.
Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 77 vs 69 on noise.
Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 80 vs 74 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 73 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Yokohama ADVAN A052, 80 vs 74 on our dry score.
Yokohama ADVAN A052, 77 vs 69 on our noise score.
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 67 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect, 58 vs 50 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology