tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama ADVAN A052 vs Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 4 + 2 road tests and 213 + 452 owner reviews. How we score

Potenza RE 71RS leads, 74–72 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Potenza RE 71RS or ADVAN A052 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama ADVAN A052
Tire AYokohama

ADVAN A052

Summer

± 5

Tests 76 · 4 tests Owners 69 · 213 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 7 in 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test (dry handling (tester's mark))

“Staggered BBSs Need Tires I have a set of BBS wheels that i have been restoring for my 89 944 NA. I am trying to figure out what tires to get and am running into a bit of trouble. The set of BBSs are 15in staggered. The front are 8in wide and the rear are 9in wide. When i had purchased these wheels they had 215/60R15s all around. Would this be a good fitment? I am hoping the rear will not look stretched. As i was researching staggered tires i ran into problems finding a matching set in the sizes 225 50R15 and 205 55R15. A local shop helped me find these for the front Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 (205 55R15) and these for the rear Yokohama ADVAN A052 (225 50R15). Im concerned to get these due to the tread pattern being drastically different. Another shop has Kumho Ecsta 4x KU22 picked out for the front. I would like to have performance summer tires that do not break the bank. If i were to do 215/60R15s all around i was looking at Falken Sincera SN250 A/S (which are not performance) or Vredestein Sprint Classic which i am not sure of. I am a bit at a loss here and would greatly appreciate any advice or help selecting tires as this is not something i am comfortable with given the lack of options at this wheel size.”

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS
Tire BBridgestone

Potenza RE 71RS

Summer

± 6

Tests 78 · 2 tests Owners 69 · 452 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 7 in 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test (wet handling (tester's mark))

“Drove my GR86 coast to coast on pre-thrashed 200tw tires in 3.5 days AMA 2024 GR86 Premium performance package mt Bridgestone Potenza RE-71rs tires Car had 24,000ish miles and now has 27,000ish”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 80

    Dry

    Potenza RE 71RS +2
    82
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN A052Potenza RE 71RS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 2 tests7376
    Reviews found online9092
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–297%100%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–1100%100%
    Dry Handling Long Run (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–199%100%
    Dry Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–0100%100%

    ADVAN A052: 60% × 73.1 + 40% × 90.4 = 80

    Potenza RE 71RS: 60% × 76 + 40% × 92.1 = 82

  2. 74

    Wet

    Potenza RE 71RS +4
    78
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN A052Potenza RE 71RS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 2 tests7885
    Reviews found online6767
    Wet Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–191%100%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–290%100%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1100%100%

    ADVAN A052: 60% × 78 + 40% × 67.4 = 74

    Potenza RE 71RS: 60% × 85 + 40% × 66.8 = 78

  3. 73

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN A052Potenza RE 71RS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)–
    Reviews found online75–

    ADVAN A052: 60% × 72.2 (est.) + 40% × 74.6 = 73

    No road tests of snow for ADVAN A052. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 68

    Comfort

    ADVAN A052 +8
    60
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN A052Potenza RE 71RS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests7571
    Reviews found online6352
    Comfort (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0100%96%

    ADVAN A052: 40% × 74.5 + 60% × 63.4 = 68

    Potenza RE 71RS: 40% × 71.1 + 60% × 52.1 = 60

  5. 77

    Noise

    ADVAN A052 +12
    65
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN A052Potenza RE 71RS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests7767
    Reviews found online7763
    Noise (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0100%84%

    ADVAN A052: 60% × 77 + 40% × 76.9 = 77

    Potenza RE 71RS: 60% × 66.6 + 40% × 63.4 = 65

  6. 50

    Treadwear

    Potenza RE 71RS +7
    57
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN A052Potenza RE 71RS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 57 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online3952

    ADVAN A052: 60% × 56.8 (est.) + 40% × 39.4 = 50

    Potenza RE 71RS: 60% × 61 (est.) + 40% × 51.5 = 57

    No road tests of treadwear for ADVAN A052. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE 71RS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 85

    Handling (owners)

    Potenza RE 71RS +1
    86
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN A052Potenza RE 71RS
    Reviews found online8586
Scores at a glance
CategoryYokohama ADVAN A052Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS
Relative Score 72 74
Dry 80 82
Wet 74 78
Snow 73 –
Comfort 68 60
Noise 77 65
Treadwear 50 57
Handling (owners) 85 86

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

ADVAN A052

± 6

Potenza RE 71RS

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 2 tests that ran both, Yokohama ADVAN A052 finished ahead 0 times and Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS 2 times.

DisciplineCategoryADVAN A052Potenza RE 71RSΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 97% 100% −2.7 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test · 275/35 R18
Dry Handling Dry 100% 100% −0.4 0–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test · 275/35 R18
Dry Handling (tester's mark) Dry 100% 100% 0.0 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test · 275/35 R18
Dry Handling Long Run Dry 99% 100% −1.1 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test · 275/35 R18
Wet Braking Wet 90% 100% −10.1 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test · 275/35 R18
Wet Handling Wet 100% 100% −0.3 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test · 275/35 R18
Wet Handling (tester's mark) Wet 91% 100% −9.4 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test · 275/35 R18
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 100% 96% +4.2 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test · 275/35 R18
Noise (tester's mark) Noise 100% 84% +16.0 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test · 275/35 R18
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #5/7 #1/7 – 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test · 275/35 R18

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ADVAN A052

Pros

  • Class-leading dry grip and traction, often compared to dedicated racing slicks.
  • Rapid warm-up time, providing peak performance almost immediately.
  • Surprisingly high levels of wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance for a performance tire.

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear, especially when used on heavy vehicles or without aggressive camber settings.
  • Tendency to 'grease up' or lose performance during long, high-intensity track sessions.
  • Soft sidewall construction can lead to vague steering feel or 'sponginess' compared to stiffer competitors.
All owner themes in the ADVAN A052 review

Tire B Potenza RE 71RS

Pros

  • Outstanding dry grip and rapid warm-up characteristics.
  • Highly predictable and communicative at the limit, allowing for easy recovery.
  • Improved on-road refinement, noise levels, and comfort compared to its predecessor.

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear, especially when used aggressively on track or heavy vehicles.
  • Tendency to become 'greasy' or lose peak grip during extended track sessions.
  • Stiff sidewalls can make mounting the tires onto rims difficult.
All owner themes in the Potenza RE 71RS review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Yokohama ADVAN A052

Positive

Community members widely view the Yokohama ADVAN A052 as a top-tier, high-grip competition tire suited for autocross and track driving. While praised for its light weight and superior all-out performance compared to standard street and summer tires, users frequently discuss its high cost, soft compound, potential lack of tread longevity on long road trips, and tendency to fling rocks.

northamericanmotoring.com

“I went with Yokohama ADVAN A052 225/45/17s for AUTOx They are more expensive but they are definitely lighter than the N2s...20.6#s vs ~25#s from what I found on the internet.”
r/944 ·7 upvotes ·2026-07-09

“Staggered BBSs Need Tires I have a set of BBS wheels that i have been restoring for my 89 944 NA. I am trying to figure out what tires to get and am running into a bit of trouble. The set of BBSs are 15in staggered. The front are 8in wide and the rear are 9in wide. When i had purchased these wheels they had 215/60R15s all around. Would this be a good fitment? I am hoping the rear will not look stretched. As i was researching staggered tires i ran into problems finding a matching set in the sizes 225 50R15 and 205 55R15. A local shop helped me find these for the front Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 (205 55R15) and these for the rear Yokohama ADVAN A052 (225 50R15). Im concerned to get these due to the tread pattern being drastically different. Another shop has Kumho Ecsta 4x KU22 picked out for the front. I would like to have performance summer tires that do not break the bank. If i were to do 215/60R15s all around i was looking at Falken Sincera SN250 A/S (which are not performance) or Vredestein Sprint Classic which i am not sure of. I am a bit at a loss here and would greatly appreciate any advice or help selecting tires as this is not something i am comfortable with given the lack of options at this wheel size.”
r/tires ·2 upvotes ·2023-07-04

“Long trip with Advans A052? I'm planning a trip to the Nürburgring to attend a trackday this October. The problem is that I live 1300 km away, so the tyres should be able to cope with that, some 20 laps at medium-fast pace at the Nordschleife, and the drive back home. Are the Advan A052 tyres way to soft for such a long trip? Will they last? Wouldn't it be wiser to settle for a more conservative set of Michelins PS4? The car is a 1986 Porsche 911 Carrera, 1210 kg... Read more”
Top themes
#competition and autocross performance#tire weight comparison#track day durability#soft compound longevity#200 treadwear grip#fitment and sizing

Based on 11 community posts

Tire B

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS

Positive

Community sentiment toward the Bridgestone Potenza RE-71RS is overwhelmingly positive, with drivers praising its high grip levels, responsive turn-in, and improved refinement over the older RE-71R. Discussions frequently center around track and autocross setups, optimal hot tire pressures, clearance pricing, and its streetability regarding road noise and gravel pickup. Minor caveats noted include fast wear characteristic of 200tw competition tires and rotation limits stemming from an asymmetrical tread design.

r/MechanicAdvice ·1 upvote ·2021-08-02

“Mileage-expectancy of Bridgestone Potenza RE-71Rs? (200-rated, I think?) Forgive me I'm getting the terminology wrong, but I just bought a super dynamite NA Miata that has had a TON of incredible suspension work (mostly Flyin' Miata stuff) and the stickiest tires I have ever experienced by FAR: Potenza RE-71Rs. (Forget full measurements but they're on 15 x 7.5" inch wheels, 6UL's by 949 Racing.) And I think their life is pretty much over. I love them but I don't want to track the car; I want to drive it two hours into the country every other weekend. I want to drive through the mountains with great . . . spiritedness . . . but I don't need track-focused tires. I'd much rather have something slightly less grippy in exchange for longer tread life. The previous owner (who I've stayed in touch with) recommenced I get "300-rated" tires instead of "200-rated" tires. I don't really know what that means or how many miles I can expect from such a tire. I'm contemplating getting the Continental Extreme Contacts, but I just don't know enough about tires to know what they're like or how much ACTUAL mileage I can get----I also dont' understand 200 vs. 300 tires. Please help?”
s2ki.com

“When I said 'they are more different than I expected,' the best way to describe that with one word is SMOOTH! These tires are smooth in all aspects. They are substantially quieter than the old 71R, maybe a 2 out of 10. After driving on two lane blacktops, I have not noticed any measurable gravel or other debris picked up at this point, definitely less than the 71R, maybe 50% reduction. Handling is the most important aspect for me personally and Bridgestone has hit a home run! Stopping fantastic and according to Bridgestone they are better on wet roads, IDK as I try to avoid driving in the rain. Steering is amazing and more sensitive! There is even a level of comfort that I did not expect for performance tires. Honestly, I am unable to come up with any negative. Five Stars! The post by jst2878 was spot on about them being a 'gift!' After break in greater than 300 miles, they just need to be hammered! After doing so yesterday, I have returned home for Pina Coladas & Pool this weekend!”
r/GR86 ·256 upvotes ·2026-09-23

“Drove my GR86 coast to coast on pre-thrashed 200tw tires in 3.5 days AMA 2024 GR86 Premium performance package mt Bridgestone Potenza RE-71rs tires Car had 24,000ish miles and now has 27,000ish”
Top themes
#track and autocross performance#tire pressure tuning#road noise and refinement#clearance pricing and availability#fitment and sizing#tread wear and longevity#comparison to previous RE-71R

Based on 33 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama ADVAN A052 B · Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available6110
Rim diameters13″ – 20″15″ – 19″
Tread depth7/32″7/32″
UTQG200 A A200 A A
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi51 psi
Sizes in common66

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama ADVAN A052

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS

Narrow edge: Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS — better treadwear and wet. Pick the Yokohama ADVAN A052 if noise and comfort matter most to you.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 77 vs 65 on noise.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 68 vs 60 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS scores 57 vs 50 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS scores 78 vs 74 on wet.

Tire A · Yokohama ADVAN A052
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ADVAN A052 or Potenza RE 71RS?

Which is better in the wet, ADVAN A052 or Potenza RE 71RS?

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS, 78 vs 74 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ADVAN A052 or Potenza RE 71RS?

Neither, by our numbers: 80 vs 82 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, ADVAN A052 or Potenza RE 71RS?

Yokohama ADVAN A052, 77 vs 65 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, ADVAN A052 or Potenza RE 71RS?

Yokohama ADVAN A052, 68 vs 60 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ADVAN A052 or Potenza RE 71RS?

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS, 57 vs 50 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology