General AltiMAX RT looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 vs General AltiMAX RT — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 1 + 11 owner reviews. How we score

g-Force Sport COMP-2 leads, 69–66 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2

g-Force Sport COMP-2

High Performance Summer tire

Provisional

Tests – · 1 test Owners 68 · 1 review

Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

General AltiMAX RT
Tire BGeneral

AltiMAX RT

All-Season Touring tires

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 11 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    g-Force Sport COMP-2 +4
    65
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Sport COMP-2AltiMAX RT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7064

    g-Force Sport COMP-2: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 70.2 = 69

    AltiMAX RT: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.7 = 65

    No road tests of dry for g-Force Sport COMP-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for AltiMAX RT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 71

    Wet

    g-Force Sport COMP-2 +4
    67
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Sport COMP-2AltiMAX RT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7266

    g-Force Sport COMP-2: 60% × 70.9 (est.) + 40% × 71.8 = 71

    AltiMAX RT: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 66 = 67

    No road tests of wet for g-Force Sport COMP-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for AltiMAX RT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    61
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Sport COMP-2AltiMAX RT
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online–55

    AltiMAX RT: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 55 = 61

    No road tests of snow for AltiMAX RT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    g-Force Sport COMP-2 +1
    65
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Sport COMP-2AltiMAX RT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6362

    g-Force Sport COMP-2: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 63 = 66

    AltiMAX RT: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.5 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for g-Force Sport COMP-2 or AltiMAX RT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 66

    Noise

    Level
    66
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Sport COMP-2AltiMAX RT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6465

    g-Force Sport COMP-2: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 64 = 66

    AltiMAX RT: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.8 = 66

    No road tests of noise for g-Force Sport COMP-2 or AltiMAX RT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 67

    Treadwear

    g-Force Sport COMP-2 +2
    65
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Sport COMP-2AltiMAX RT
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests70≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6364

    g-Force Sport COMP-2: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 62.9 = 67

    AltiMAX RT: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for AltiMAX RT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 69

    Handling (owners)

    g-Force Sport COMP-2 +5
    64
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Sport COMP-2AltiMAX RT
    Reviews found online6964
Scores at a glance
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 vs General AltiMAX RT: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2General AltiMAX RT
Relative Score 69 66
Dry 69 65
Wet 71 67
Snow – 61
Comfort 66 65
Noise 66 66
Treadwear 67 65
Handling (owners) 69 64

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

g-Force Sport COMP-2

AltiMAX RT

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A g-Force Sport COMP-2

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B AltiMAX RT

Pros

  • Affordable price point offering high value
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality suitable for large sedans
  • Reliable all-around traction in both wet and dry conditions

Cons

  • Subpar wet-weather performance reported by some users
  • Premature tread wear down to 30,000 miles in isolated experiences
All owner themes in the AltiMAX RT review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 B · General AltiMAX RT
CategoryHigh Performance Summer tireAll-Season Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth9 - 10/32″10/32″
UTQG340 AA A440 A A
Treadwear warranty—70,000 mi
SidewallBlack Side WallBlackwall
Max pressure50 - 51 psi44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2

General AltiMAX RT

Narrow edge: BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 — better dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional. General AltiMAX RT rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 scores 69 vs 65 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 scores 71 vs 67 on wet.

Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2
Tire B · General AltiMAX RT

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

g-Force Sport COMP-2 or AltiMAX RT?

Which is better in the wet, g-Force Sport COMP-2 or AltiMAX RT?

BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2, 71 vs 67 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, g-Force Sport COMP-2 or AltiMAX RT?

BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2, 69 vs 65 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, g-Force Sport COMP-2 or AltiMAX RT?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 66 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, g-Force Sport COMP-2 or AltiMAX RT?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 65 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, g-Force Sport COMP-2 or AltiMAX RT?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology