Tests – · 1 test Owners 67 · 1 review
Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Head-to-head
Updated
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 1 road tests and 1 + 1,457 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: g-Force Sport COMP-2 and Firehawk Indy 500 are level at 69.
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 62 · 1,457 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
“I just put Firestone Firehawk Indy 500's on my NC2 and I like them and would recommend them. I paid about $635 with installation at Costco but you might even be able to find them for less elsewhere.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
Firehawk Indy 500 +574Why this score
Source g-Force Sport COMP-2 Firehawk Indy 500 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 69 78 g-Force Sport COMP-2: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.9 = 69
Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 77.6 = 74
No road tests of dry for g-Force Sport COMP-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
72
Wet
g-Force Sport COMP-2 +567Why this score
Source g-Force Sport COMP-2 Firehawk Indy 500 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 72 65 g-Force Sport COMP-2: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 72
Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.1 = 67
No road tests of wet for g-Force Sport COMP-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison44Why this score
Source g-Force Sport COMP-2 Firehawk Indy 500 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 55 (est.) Reviews found online – 28 Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 54.7 (est.) + 40% × 27.7 = 44
No road tests of snow for Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
65
Comfort
Firehawk Indy 500 +166Why this score
Source g-Force Sport COMP-2 Firehawk Indy 500 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 63 64 g-Force Sport COMP-2: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 63.1 = 65
Firehawk Indy 500: 40% × 68.3 (est.) + 60% × 64.4 = 66
No road tests of comfort for g-Force Sport COMP-2 or Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison66Why this score
Source g-Force Sport COMP-2 Firehawk Indy 500 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 65 Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.9 = 66
No road tests of noise for Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
67
Treadwear
g-Force Sport COMP-2 +166Why this score
Source g-Force Sport COMP-2 Firehawk Indy 500 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 70 70 Reviews found online 63 61 Tested Tread Life (Miles) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–0 62% 62% g-Force Sport COMP-2: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 62.6 = 67
Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 60.8 = 66
-
68
Handling (owners)
Firehawk Indy 500 +371Why this score
Source g-Force Sport COMP-2 Firehawk Indy 500 Reviews found online 68 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 | Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 69 |
| Dry | 69 | 74 |
| Wet | 72 | 67 |
| Snow | – | 44 |
| Comfort | 65 | 66 |
| Noise | – | 66 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 68 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
69
/ 100
g-Force Sport COMP-2
69
/ 100
Firehawk Indy 500
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 finished ahead 0 times and Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 1 times.
| Discipline | Category | g-Force Sport COMP-2 | Firehawk Indy 500 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tested Tread Life (Miles) | Treadwear | 62% | 62% | 0.0 | 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires · 215/60R18 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #20/22 | #9/22 | – | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires · 215/60R18 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A g-Force Sport COMP-2
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Firehawk Indy 500
Pros
- Exceptional value and affordability compared to premium tier brands like Michelin
- Outstanding dry grip and confident, responsive cornering capabilities
- Surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride quality on the highway
Cons
- Accelerated tread wear and shorter overall lifespan
- Poor performance and loss of traction in cold temperatures (below 40°F)
- Vulnerability to hydroplaning or reduced traction in heavy standing water
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
Community sentiment toward the Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 is overwhelmingly positive, with drivers frequently praising it as an exceptional value and budget-friendly alternative to premium summer tires. Owners report strong dry grip, solid wet-weather traction, good comfort, and predictable handling, though some note reduced performance in cold temperatures, softer sidewalls, and a tendency to get greasy during aggressive track sessions. Interest is also growing around the newer V2 version and its updated compound and tread design.
r/Mustang
·7 upvotes ·2025-02-13
“Will I regret buying Firestone Firehawk Indy 500s? I have a stock '21 GT Premium convertible with the black appearance package. It came with the upgraded Pirelli P Zero 255/40-19 tires, but with 35,000 miles, they are really worn, and I need new tires. I live in North Florida. We don't have a lot of cold weather (I missed the snow last month), but I do get a lot of rain. I don't track the car, and mostly drive on country roads and the interstate. The Pirelli's have treated me well as far as traction, dry and wet. I like the aggressive look of the Firehawks, but I am concerned about wet weather traction. Will the Firehawks be at least comparable to the Pirelli's for wet weather and general handling? If not, it sounds like the Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 4 is the way to go. Also, the car is all black, with black rims, and the tires look wimpy. I'm not up for new rims this go-round, and I won't lower it because I like the clearance for potholes, etc., that I see a lot of in my area. I'm hoping the tires will help the look a little bit. Read more”
r/Miata
·1 upvote ·2026-10-07
“I just put Firestone Firehawk Indy 500's on my NC2 and I like them and would recommend them. I paid about $635 with installation at Costco but you might even be able to find them for less elsewhere.”
forum.miata.net
“I had them on wifes old MR2 spyder, drove great. deep tread and quiet, did not exhibit any bad behavior and held well at high speed on ramps, ect....great in wet weather and were by far the longest lasting tire I ever had on that car, yokohamas would burn down in 15-20k miles in rear and staggered so no rotates. different beast, I know but the tires on a miata should easily go 40-50k.”
Top themes
#value and pricing#dry grip and traction#wet weather handling#track and autocross use#cold temperature limitations#ride comfort and road noise#Firehawk Indy 500 V2
Based on 146 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 | B · Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | High Performance Summer tire | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 47 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 9 - 10/32″ | 9 - 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 340 AA A | 340 A A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 50 - 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
69
/ 100
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2
69
/ 100
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
Too close to call: BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 and Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 is stronger on wet. Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 is stronger on dry. BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 scores 72 vs 67 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 scores 74 vs 69 on dry.
Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2
Tire B · Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
g-Force Sport COMP-2 or Firehawk Indy 500?
Which is better in the wet, g-Force Sport COMP-2 or Firehawk Indy 500?
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2, 72 vs 67 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, g-Force Sport COMP-2 or Firehawk Indy 500?
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500, 74 vs 69 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, g-Force Sport COMP-2 or Firehawk Indy 500?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 66 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, g-Force Sport COMP-2 or Firehawk Indy 500?
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 66 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology