tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 vs Continental ExtremeContact Sport — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 2 road tests and 1 + 45 owner reviews. How we score

ExtremeContact Sport is ahead, 75–68

Check price on Amazon · ExtremeContact Sport or g-Force Sport COMP-2 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2
Tire ABFGoodrich

g-Force Sport COMP-2

High Performance Summer tire

± 8Provisional

Tests – · 1 test Owners 67 · 1 review

Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Continental ExtremeContact Sport
Tire BContinental

ExtremeContact Sport

Summer

± 6

Tests 74 · 2 tests Owners 69 · 45 reviews

Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    ExtremeContact Sport +8
    76
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Sport COMP-2ExtremeContact Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 68 (est.)74
    Reviews found online6880

    g-Force Sport COMP-2: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 68

    ExtremeContact Sport: 60% × 74 + 40% × 79.7 = 76

    No road tests of dry for g-Force Sport COMP-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 71

    Wet

    ExtremeContact Sport +9
    80
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Sport COMP-2ExtremeContact Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 71 (est.)79
    Reviews found online7280

    g-Force Sport COMP-2: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 71

    ExtremeContact Sport: 60% × 79.3 + 40% × 80.2 = 80

    No road tests of wet for g-Force Sport COMP-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    48
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Sport COMP-2ExtremeContact Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online–32

    ExtremeContact Sport: 60% × 58.2 (est.) + 40% × 31.7 = 48

    No road tests of snow for ExtremeContact Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 64

    Comfort

    ExtremeContact Sport +8
    72
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Sport COMP-2ExtremeContact Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6374

    g-Force Sport COMP-2: 40% × 67.5 (est.) + 60% × 62.5 = 64

    ExtremeContact Sport: 40% × 69.8 (est.) + 60% × 73.6 = 72

    No road tests of comfort for g-Force Sport COMP-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for ExtremeContact Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    71
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Sport COMP-2ExtremeContact Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–73
    Reviews found online–67

    ExtremeContact Sport: 60% × 72.6 + 40% × 67.4 = 71

  6. 67

    Treadwear

    ExtremeContact Sport +2
    69
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Sport COMP-2ExtremeContact Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests7070
    Reviews found online6368
    Tested Tread Life (Miles) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–062%62%

    g-Force Sport COMP-2: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 62.8 = 67

    ExtremeContact Sport: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 67.9 = 69

  7. 68

    Handling (owners)

    ExtremeContact Sport +6
    74
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Sport COMP-2ExtremeContact Sport
    Reviews found online6874
Scores at a glance
CategoryBFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2Continental ExtremeContact Sport
Relative Score 68 75
Dry 68 76
Wet 71 80
Snow – 48
Comfort 64 72
Noise – 71
Treadwear 67 69
Handling (owners) 68 74

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

g-Force Sport COMP-2

± 6

ExtremeContact Sport

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 finished ahead 0 times and Continental ExtremeContact Sport 1 times.

DisciplineCategoryg-Force Sport COMP-2ExtremeContact SportΔHead-to-head
Tested Tread Life (Miles) Treadwear 62% 62% 0.0 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires · 215/60R18
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #20/22 #2/22 – 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires · 215/60R18

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A g-Force Sport COMP-2

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B ExtremeContact Sport

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet traction with high confidence in the rain
  • High value for money compared to primary competitors like Michelin
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality for an ultra-high-performance tire

Cons

  • Softer sidewalls leading to a slight delay or lack of immediate steering feedback and precision
  • Requires a brief warm-up period in colder temperatures, sometimes causing temporary vibrations
  • Stiff ride over sharp road imperfections noted by some users
All owner themes in the ExtremeContact Sport review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 B · Continental ExtremeContact Sport
CategoryHigh Performance Summer tireSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth9 - 10/32″10/32″
UTQG340 AA A340 AA A
Treadwear warranty—30,000 mi
SidewallBlack Side WallBlack Side Wall
Max pressure50 - 51 psi44 - 51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2

Continental ExtremeContact Sport

Winner: Continental ExtremeContact Sport — better wet, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental ExtremeContact Sport scores 80 vs 71 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental ExtremeContact Sport scores 76 vs 68 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Continental ExtremeContact Sport scores 72 vs 64 on comfort.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental ExtremeContact Sport scores 74 vs 68 on handling.

Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Continental ExtremeContact Sport
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

g-Force Sport COMP-2 or ExtremeContact Sport?

Which is better in the wet, g-Force Sport COMP-2 or ExtremeContact Sport?

Continental ExtremeContact Sport, 80 vs 71 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, g-Force Sport COMP-2 or ExtremeContact Sport?

Continental ExtremeContact Sport, 76 vs 68 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, g-Force Sport COMP-2 or ExtremeContact Sport?

Continental ExtremeContact Sport, 72 vs 64 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, g-Force Sport COMP-2 or ExtremeContact Sport?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 69 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology