Tests – · 1 test Owners 67 · 1 review
Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Head-to-head
Updated
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 vs Laufenn S FIT AS — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 1 road tests and 1 + 16 owner reviews. How we score
g-Force Sport COMP-2 is ahead, 68–61
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
g-Force Sport COMP-2 +860Why this score
Source g-Force Sport COMP-2 S FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 68 55 g-Force Sport COMP-2: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 68
S FIT AS: 60% × 62.7 (est.) + 40% × 55.3 = 60
No road tests of dry for g-Force Sport COMP-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for S FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
71
Wet
g-Force Sport COMP-2 +1358Why this score
Source g-Force Sport COMP-2 S FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 72 54 g-Force Sport COMP-2: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 71
S FIT AS: 60% × 61.4 (est.) + 40% × 53.7 = 58
No road tests of wet for g-Force Sport COMP-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for S FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison50Why this score
Source g-Force Sport COMP-2 S FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online – 37 S FIT AS: 60% × 59.7 (est.) + 40% × 36.5 = 50
No road tests of snow for S FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
64
Comfort
g-Force Sport COMP-2 +361Why this score
Source g-Force Sport COMP-2 S FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 63 58 g-Force Sport COMP-2: 40% × 67.5 (est.) + 60% × 62.5 = 64
S FIT AS: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 57.9 = 61
No road tests of comfort for g-Force Sport COMP-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for S FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
67
Treadwear
Level67Why this score
Source g-Force Sport COMP-2 S FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 70 75 Reviews found online 63 56 g-Force Sport COMP-2: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 62.8 = 67
S FIT AS: 60% × 74.9 + 40% × 56.3 = 67
-
68
Handling (owners)
g-Force Sport COMP-2 +1355Why this score
Source g-Force Sport COMP-2 S FIT AS Reviews found online 68 55
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 | Laufenn S FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 61 |
| Dry | 68 | 60 |
| Wet | 71 | 58 |
| Snow | – | 50 |
| Comfort | 64 | 61 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 68 | 55 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
68
/ 100
g-Force Sport COMP-2
61
/ 100
S FIT AS
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | g-Force Sport COMP-2 | S FIT AS | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tested Tread Life (Miles) | Treadwear | 62% #6/22 · 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires | 80% #4/19 · 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #20/22 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires | #15/19 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A g-Force Sport COMP-2
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B S FIT AS
Pros
- Exceptional value for the price compared to ultra-budget alternatives
- Very quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Good grip and handling in dry conditions
Cons
- Subpar wet-weather grip, with tendencies to lose traction easily under acceleration
- Wet performance degrades noticeably after 50% wear
- Concerns regarding rapid tread wear or limited lifespan
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 | B · Laufenn S FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | High Performance Summer tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 9 - 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 340 AA A | 500 A A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
68
/ 100
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2
61
/ 100
Laufenn S FIT AS
Winner: BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional. Laufenn S FIT AS rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 scores 71 vs 58 on wet.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 scores 68 vs 55 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 scores 68 vs 60 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 scores 64 vs 61 on comfort.
Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2
Tire B · Laufenn S FIT AS
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
g-Force Sport COMP-2 or S FIT AS?
Which is better in the wet, g-Force Sport COMP-2 or S FIT AS?
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2, 71 vs 58 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, g-Force Sport COMP-2 or S FIT AS?
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2, 68 vs 60 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, g-Force Sport COMP-2 or S FIT AS?
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2, 64 vs 61 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, g-Force Sport COMP-2 or S FIT AS?
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 67 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology