Tests – · none yet Owners 66 · 6 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport vs BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 6 + 1 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: g-Force Sport 68, g-Force Sport COMP-2 69.
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 67 · 1 review
Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
g-Force Sport +169Why this score
Source g-Force Sport g-Force Sport COMP-2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 71 69 g-Force Sport: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.1 = 70
g-Force Sport COMP-2: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.9 = 69
No road tests of dry for g-Force Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for g-Force Sport COMP-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
71
Wet
g-Force Sport COMP-2 +172Why this score
Source g-Force Sport g-Force Sport COMP-2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 71 72 g-Force Sport: 60% × 70.8 (est.) + 40% × 70.9 = 71
g-Force Sport COMP-2: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 72
No road tests of wet for g-Force Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for g-Force Sport COMP-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
67
Comfort
g-Force Sport +265Why this score
Source g-Force Sport g-Force Sport COMP-2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 66 63 g-Force Sport: 40% × 68.6 (est.) + 60% × 66 = 67
g-Force Sport COMP-2: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 63.1 = 65
No road tests of comfort for g-Force Sport or g-Force Sport COMP-2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
60
Treadwear
g-Force Sport COMP-2 +767Why this score
Source g-Force Sport g-Force Sport COMP-2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 63 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 56 63 g-Force Sport: 60% × 62.6 (est.) + 40% × 56.2 = 60
g-Force Sport COMP-2: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 62.5 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for g-Force Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
68
Handling (owners)
Level68Why this score
Source g-Force Sport g-Force Sport COMP-2 Reviews found online 68 68
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich g-Force Sport | BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 69 |
| Dry | 70 | 69 |
| Wet | 71 | 72 |
| Comfort | 67 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 60 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 68 | 68 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
68
/ 100
g-Force Sport
69
/ 100
g-Force Sport COMP-2
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A g-Force Sport
Pros
- Excellent dry surface grip and handling
- High value-to-performance ratio
- Quiet operation compared to factory tires
Cons
- Rapid tread wear reported by some users
- Inconsistent performance in wet conditions
- Potential for premature degradation
Tire B g-Force Sport COMP-2
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich g-Force Sport | B · BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | High Performance Summer tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | — | 9 - 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 340 AA A |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 - 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
68
/ 100
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport
69
/ 100
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2
Too close to call: BFGoodrich g-Force Sport and BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 is stronger on treadwear. BFGoodrich g-Force Sport rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional. BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 scores 67 vs 60 on treadwear.
Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force Sport
Tire B · BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
g-Force Sport or g-Force Sport COMP-2?
Which is better in the wet, g-Force Sport or g-Force Sport COMP-2?
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 72 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, g-Force Sport or g-Force Sport COMP-2?
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 69 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, g-Force Sport or g-Force Sport COMP-2?
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 65 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, g-Force Sport or g-Force Sport COMP-2?
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2, 67 vs 60 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology