Tests – · none yet Owners 66 · 6 reviews
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport vs Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 6 + 13 owner reviews. How we score
g-Force Sport is ahead, 68–58
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 51 · 13 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
g-Force Sport +1060Why this score
Source g-Force Sport Turanza T005 RFT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 71 55 g-Force Sport: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 70
Turanza T005 RFT: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 55.4 = 60
No road tests of dry for g-Force Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Turanza T005 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
71
Wet
g-Force Sport +863Why this score
Source g-Force Sport Turanza T005 RFT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 71 61 g-Force Sport: 60% × 70.7 (est.) + 40% × 70.7 = 71
Turanza T005 RFT: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 60.6 = 63
No road tests of wet for g-Force Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Turanza T005 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
66
Comfort
g-Force Sport +1452Why this score
Source g-Force Sport Turanza T005 RFT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 65 45 g-Force Sport: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 65.4 = 66
Turanza T005 RFT: 40% × 63.8 (est.) + 60% × 44.7 = 52
No road tests of comfort for g-Force Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Turanza T005 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
60
Treadwear
g-Force Sport +1050Why this score
Source g-Force Sport Turanza T005 RFT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 57 (est.) Reviews found online 56 39 g-Force Sport: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 56.4 = 60
Turanza T005 RFT: 60% × 56.7 (est.) + 40% × 39.4 = 50
No road tests of treadwear for g-Force Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Turanza T005 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
68
Handling (owners)
g-Force Sport +1355Why this score
Source g-Force Sport Turanza T005 RFT Reviews found online 68 55
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich g-Force Sport | Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 58 |
| Dry | 70 | 60 |
| Wet | 71 | 63 |
| Comfort | 66 | 52 |
| Treadwear | 60 | 50 |
| Handling (owners) | 68 | 55 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
g-Force Sport
Turanza T005 RFT
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A g-Force Sport
Pros
- Excellent dry surface grip and handling
- High value-to-performance ratio
- Quiet operation compared to factory tires
Cons
- Rapid tread wear reported by some users
- Inconsistent performance in wet conditions
- Potential for premature degradation
Tire B Turanza T005 RFT
Pros
- Commendable initial ride comfort for a run-flat tire
- Responsive and direct steering feedback
- Strong dry and wet braking performance
Cons
- Rapid and premature tread wear
- Significant increase in road noise as the tire wears
- Susceptibility to structural damage and bulges from road impacts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich g-Force Sport | B · Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport
Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT
Winner: BFGoodrich g-Force Sport — better comfort, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. BFGoodrich g-Force Sport rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 13 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport scores 66 vs 52 on comfort.
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport scores 68 vs 55 on handling.
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport scores 70 vs 60 on dry.
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport scores 60 vs 50 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
g-Force Sport or Turanza T005 RFT?
Which is better in the wet, g-Force Sport or Turanza T005 RFT?
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport, 71 vs 63 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, g-Force Sport or Turanza T005 RFT?
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport, 70 vs 60 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, g-Force Sport or Turanza T005 RFT?
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport, 66 vs 52 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, g-Force Sport or Turanza T005 RFT?
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport, 60 vs 50 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology