Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 6 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport vs Falken ZE914 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
ZE914 is ahead, 72–66
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
ZE914 +674Why this score
Source g-Force Sport ZE914 Reviews found online 69 77 -
69
Wet
ZE914 +574Why this score
Source g-Force Sport ZE914 Reviews found online 69 76 -
67
Comfort
ZE914 +471Why this score
Source g-Force Sport ZE914 Reviews found online 65 73 -
59
Treadwear
ZE914 +968Why this score
Source g-Force Sport ZE914 Reviews found online 55 70 -
67
Handling
ZE914 +875Why this score
Source g-Force Sport ZE914 Reviews found online 67 75
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich g-Force Sport | Falken ZE914 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 72 |
| Dry | 68 | 74 |
| Wet | 69 | 74 |
| Comfort | 67 | 71 |
| Treadwear | 59 | 68 |
| Handling | 67 | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
66
/ 100
g-Force Sport
72
/ 100
ZE914
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A g-Force Sport
Pros
- Excellent dry surface grip and handling
- High value-to-performance ratio
- Quiet operation compared to factory tires
Cons
- Rapid tread wear reported by some users
- Inconsistent performance in wet conditions
- Potential for premature degradation
Tire B ZE914
Pros
- Exceptional value for money compared to premium competitors
- Strong, predictable grip in both dry and wet conditions
- Progressive handling characteristics that provide driver confidence
Cons
- Reports of increased road noise, particularly as the tread wears down
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear
- Occasional reports of poor wet-weather traction on specific high-torque or lightweight sports vehicles
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich g-Force Sport | B · Falken ZE914 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
66
/ 100
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport
72
/ 100
Falken ZE914
Winner: Falken ZE914 — better treadwear, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Falken ZE914 scores 68 vs 59 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Falken ZE914 scores 75 vs 67 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Falken ZE914 scores 74 vs 68 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Falken ZE914 scores 74 vs 69 on wet.
Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force Sport
Tire B · Falken ZE914
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.