Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich g-Force Sport vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 6 + 1,457 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: g-Force Sport 68, Firehawk Indy 500 69.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
± 7

Tests – · 1 test Owners 62 · 1,457 reviews

Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“I just put Firestone Firehawk Indy 500's on my NC2 and I like them and would recommend them. I paid about $635 with installation at Costco but you might even be able to find them for less elsewhere.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 70

    Dry

    Firehawk Indy 500 +4
    74
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force SportFirehawk Indy 500
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online7178

    g-Force Sport: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.1 = 70

    Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 77.6 = 74

    No road tests of dry for g-Force Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 71

    Wet

    g-Force Sport +4
    67
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force SportFirehawk Indy 500
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7165

    g-Force Sport: 60% × 70.8 (est.) + 40% × 70.9 = 71

    Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.1 = 67

    No road tests of wet for g-Force Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    44
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force SportFirehawk Indy 500
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 55 (est.)
    Reviews found online–28

    Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 54.7 (est.) + 40% × 27.7 = 44

    No road tests of snow for Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 67

    Comfort

    g-Force Sport +1
    66
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force SportFirehawk Indy 500
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6664

    g-Force Sport: 40% × 68.6 (est.) + 60% × 66 = 67

    Firehawk Indy 500: 40% × 68.3 (est.) + 60% × 64.4 = 66

    No road tests of comfort for g-Force Sport or Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    66
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force SportFirehawk Indy 500
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–65

    Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.9 = 66

    No road tests of noise for Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 60

    Treadwear

    Firehawk Indy 500 +6
    66
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force SportFirehawk Indy 500
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 63 (est.)70
    Reviews found online5661

    g-Force Sport: 60% × 62.7 (est.) + 40% × 56.3 = 60

    Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 60.8 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for g-Force Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 68

    Handling (owners)

    Firehawk Indy 500 +3
    71
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force SportFirehawk Indy 500
    Reviews found online6871
Scores at a glance
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich g-Force SportFirestone Firehawk Indy 500
Relative Score 68 69
Dry 70 74
Wet 71 67
Snow – 44
Comfort 67 66
Noise – 66
Treadwear 60 66
Handling (owners) 68 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

g-Force Sport

± 7

Firehawk Indy 500

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A g-Force Sport

Pros

  • Excellent dry surface grip and handling
  • High value-to-performance ratio
  • Quiet operation compared to factory tires

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear reported by some users
  • Inconsistent performance in wet conditions
  • Potential for premature degradation
All owner themes in the g-Force Sport review

Tire B Firehawk Indy 500

Pros

  • Exceptional value and affordability compared to premium tier brands like Michelin
  • Outstanding dry grip and confident, responsive cornering capabilities
  • Surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride quality on the highway

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear and shorter overall lifespan
  • Poor performance and loss of traction in cold temperatures (below 40°F)
  • Vulnerability to hydroplaning or reduced traction in heavy standing water
All owner themes in the Firehawk Indy 500 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

BFGoodrich g-Force Sport

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500

Positive

Community sentiment toward the Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 is overwhelmingly positive, with drivers frequently praising it as an exceptional value and budget-friendly alternative to premium summer tires. Owners report strong dry grip, solid wet-weather traction, good comfort, and predictable handling, though some note reduced performance in cold temperatures, softer sidewalls, and a tendency to get greasy during aggressive track sessions. Interest is also growing around the newer V2 version and its updated compound and tread design.

r/Mustang ·7 upvotes ·2025-02-13

“Will I regret buying Firestone Firehawk Indy 500s? I have a stock '21 GT Premium convertible with the black appearance package. It came with the upgraded Pirelli P Zero 255/40-19 tires, but with 35,000 miles, they are really worn, and I need new tires. I live in North Florida. We don't have a lot of cold weather (I missed the snow last month), but I do get a lot of rain. I don't track the car, and mostly drive on country roads and the interstate. The Pirelli's have treated me well as far as traction, dry and wet. I like the aggressive look of the Firehawks, but I am concerned about wet weather traction. Will the Firehawks be at least comparable to the Pirelli's for wet weather and general handling? If not, it sounds like the Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 4 is the way to go. Also, the car is all black, with black rims, and the tires look wimpy. I'm not up for new rims this go-round, and I won't lower it because I like the clearance for potholes, etc., that I see a lot of in my area. I'm hoping the tires will help the look a little bit. Read more”

r/Miata ·1 upvote ·2026-10-07

“I just put Firestone Firehawk Indy 500's on my NC2 and I like them and would recommend them. I paid about $635 with installation at Costco but you might even be able to find them for less elsewhere.”

forum.miata.net

“I had them on wifes old MR2 spyder, drove great. deep tread and quiet, did not exhibit any bad behavior and held well at high speed on ramps, ect....great in wet weather and were by far the longest lasting tire I ever had on that car, yokohamas would burn down in 15-20k miles in rear and staggered so no rotates. different beast, I know but the tires on a miata should easily go 40-50k.”

Top themes
#value and pricing#dry grip and traction#wet weather handling#track and autocross use#cold temperature limitations#ride comfort and road noise#Firehawk Indy 500 V2

Based on 146 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich g-Force Sport B · Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—47
Rim diameters—16″ – 20″
Tread depth—9 - 10/32″
UTQG—340 A A
Sidewall—Black Side Wall
Max pressure—50 - 51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich g-Force Sport

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500

Too close to call: BFGoodrich g-Force Sport and Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich g-Force Sport is stronger on wet. Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 is stronger on treadwear and dry. BFGoodrich g-Force Sport rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 scores 66 vs 60 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

BFGoodrich g-Force Sport scores 71 vs 67 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 scores 74 vs 70 on dry.

Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force Sport
Tire B · Firestone Firehawk Indy 500

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

g-Force Sport or Firehawk Indy 500?

Which is better in the wet, g-Force Sport or Firehawk Indy 500?

BFGoodrich g-Force Sport, 71 vs 67 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, g-Force Sport or Firehawk Indy 500?

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500, 74 vs 70 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, g-Force Sport or Firehawk Indy 500?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 66 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, g-Force Sport or Firehawk Indy 500?

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500, 66 vs 60 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology