Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich g-Force Sport vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 6 + 63 owner reviews. How we score

BluEarth Es ES32 leads, 72–68 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 70

    Dry

    BluEarth Es ES32 +1
    71
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force SportBluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7173

    g-Force Sport: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 70

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 71

    No road tests of dry for g-Force Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 71

    Wet

    BluEarth Es ES32 +4
    75
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force SportBluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online7176

    g-Force Sport: 60% × 70.7 (est.) + 40% × 70.7 = 71

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 73.7 (est.) + 40% × 76.2 = 75

    No road tests of wet for g-Force Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 66

    Comfort

    BluEarth Es ES32 +8
    74
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force SportBluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6576

    g-Force Sport: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 65.4 = 66

    BluEarth Es ES32: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 75.8 = 74

    No road tests of comfort for g-Force Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. 60

    Treadwear

    BluEarth Es ES32 +7
    67
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force SportBluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5667

    g-Force Sport: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 56.4 = 60

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 67

    No road tests of treadwear for g-Force Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  5. 68

    Handling (owners)

    BluEarth Es ES32 +9
    77
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force SportBluEarth Es ES32
    Reviews found online6877
Scores at a glance
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich g-Force SportYokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Relative Score 68 72
Dry 70 71
Wet 71 75
Comfort 66 74
Treadwear 60 67
Handling (owners) 68 77

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

g-Force Sport

± 8

BluEarth Es ES32

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A g-Force Sport

Pros

  • Excellent dry surface grip and handling
  • High value-to-performance ratio
  • Quiet operation compared to factory tires

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear reported by some users
  • Inconsistent performance in wet conditions
  • Potential for premature degradation
All owner themes in the g-Force Sport review

Tire B BluEarth Es ES32

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and smoothness over bumps
  • Noticeably low road noise and quiet operation
  • Strong value for money compared to premium brands

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear reported by some drivers
  • Diminished wet weather grip and increased skidding risk as the tread wears down
  • Not suited for high-performance driving or aggressive cornering
All owner themes in the BluEarth Es ES32 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich g-Force Sport B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—64
Rim diameters—13″ – 18″

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich g-Force Sport

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

Narrow edge: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better handling, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. BFGoodrich g-Force Sport rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 77 vs 68 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 74 vs 66 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 67 vs 60 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 75 vs 71 on wet.

Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force Sport
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

g-Force Sport or BluEarth Es ES32?

Which is better in the wet, g-Force Sport or BluEarth Es ES32?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 75 vs 71 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, g-Force Sport or BluEarth Es ES32?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 71 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, g-Force Sport or BluEarth Es ES32?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 74 vs 66 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, g-Force Sport or BluEarth Es ES32?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 67 vs 60 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology