Tests – · none yet Owners 66 · 6 reviews
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 6 + 63 owner reviews. How we score
BluEarth Es ES32 leads, 72–68 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 63 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
BluEarth Es ES32 +171Why this score
Source g-Force Sport BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 71 73 g-Force Sport: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 70
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 71
No road tests of dry for g-Force Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
71
Wet
BluEarth Es ES32 +475Why this score
Source g-Force Sport BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 74 (est.) Reviews found online 71 76 g-Force Sport: 60% × 70.7 (est.) + 40% × 70.7 = 71
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 73.7 (est.) + 40% × 76.2 = 75
No road tests of wet for g-Force Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
66
Comfort
BluEarth Es ES32 +874Why this score
Source g-Force Sport BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 65 76 g-Force Sport: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 65.4 = 66
BluEarth Es ES32: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 75.8 = 74
No road tests of comfort for g-Force Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
60
Treadwear
BluEarth Es ES32 +767Why this score
Source g-Force Sport BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 56 67 g-Force Sport: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 56.4 = 60
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for g-Force Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
68
Handling (owners)
BluEarth Es ES32 +977Why this score
Source g-Force Sport BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 68 77
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich g-Force Sport | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 72 |
| Dry | 70 | 71 |
| Wet | 71 | 75 |
| Comfort | 66 | 74 |
| Treadwear | 60 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 68 | 77 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
g-Force Sport
BluEarth Es ES32
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A g-Force Sport
Pros
- Excellent dry surface grip and handling
- High value-to-performance ratio
- Quiet operation compared to factory tires
Cons
- Rapid tread wear reported by some users
- Inconsistent performance in wet conditions
- Potential for premature degradation
Tire B BluEarth Es ES32
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and smoothness over bumps
- Noticeably low road noise and quiet operation
- Strong value for money compared to premium brands
Cons
- Faster-than-average tread wear reported by some drivers
- Diminished wet weather grip and increased skidding risk as the tread wears down
- Not suited for high-performance driving or aggressive cornering
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich g-Force Sport | B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 64 |
| Rim diameters | — | 13″ – 18″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Narrow edge: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better handling, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. BFGoodrich g-Force Sport rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 77 vs 68 on handling.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 74 vs 66 on comfort.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 67 vs 60 on treadwear.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 75 vs 71 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
g-Force Sport or BluEarth Es ES32?
Which is better in the wet, g-Force Sport or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 75 vs 71 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, g-Force Sport or BluEarth Es ES32?
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 71 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, g-Force Sport or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 74 vs 66 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, g-Force Sport or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 67 vs 60 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology