BFGoodrich Winter Slalom looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 vs BFGoodrich Winter Slalom — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 18 + 0 road tests and 30 + 3 owner reviews. How we score

g-Force Winter 2 is ahead, 76–70

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2

Tests 78 · 18 tests Owners 80 · 30 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 31 in 2023 Winter Tyre Test 54 Set Braking Test (snow braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    g-Force Winter 2 +1
    68
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Winter 2Winter Slalom
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / – tests63≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7868

    g-Force Winter 2: 60% × 63.5 + 40% × 78.1 = 69

    Winter Slalom: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 68

    No road tests of dry for Winter Slalom. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 84

    Wet

    g-Force Winter 2 +10
    74
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Winter 2Winter Slalom
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 18 / – tests85≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online8475

    g-Force Winter 2: 60% × 84.6 + 40% × 83.9 = 84

    Winter Slalom: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.1 = 74

    No road tests of wet for Winter Slalom. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 88

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Winter 2Winter Slalom
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 18 / – tests93–
    Reviews found online82–

    g-Force Winter 2: 60% × 93 + 40% × 81.6 = 88

  4. 75

    Comfort

    g-Force Winter 2 +5
    70
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Winter 2Winter Slalom
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests70≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online8271

    g-Force Winter 2: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 82.2 = 75

    Winter Slalom: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.1 = 70

    No road tests of comfort for Winter Slalom. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 77

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Winter 2Winter Slalom
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / – tests83–
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)–

    g-Force Winter 2: 60% × 82.9 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 77

    No owner ratings of noise for g-Force Winter 2. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 73

    Treadwear

    g-Force Winter 2 +7
    66
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Winter 2Winter Slalom
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / – tests71≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7667

    g-Force Winter 2: 60% × 71.4 + 40% × 75.6 = 73

    Winter Slalom: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 66.8 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for Winter Slalom. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 82

    Handling (owners)

    g-Force Winter 2 +15
    67
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Winter 2Winter Slalom
    Reviews found online8267
Scores at a glance
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 vs BFGoodrich Winter Slalom: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2BFGoodrich Winter Slalom
Relative Score 76 70
Dry 69 68
Wet 84 74
Snow 88 –
Comfort 75 70
Noise 77 –
Treadwear 73 66
Handling (owners) 82 67

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

g-Force Winter 2

Winter Slalom

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A g-Force Winter 2

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and grip in deep snow and on ice
  • Strong performance in wet conditions with effective water evacuation
  • High value-for-money ratio compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Lack of on-center steering feel and responsiveness
  • Mediocre handling and grip during dry-road driving
  • Increased noise levels on certain road surfaces
All owner themes in the g-Force Winter 2 review

Tire B Winter Slalom

Pros

  • Strong traction in snow and wet conditions
  • Aggressive tread profile
  • Low road noise

Cons

  • Significant loss of grip as the tire ages
  • Performance degradation on wet surfaces after several years of use
All owner themes in the Winter Slalom review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 B · BFGoodrich Winter Slalom
CategoryWinterWinter Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available75—
Rim diameters14″ – 20″—

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2

BFGoodrich Winter Slalom

Winner: BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 — better handling, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. BFGoodrich Winter Slalom rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 3 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 scores 82 vs 67 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 scores 84 vs 74 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 scores 73 vs 66 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 scores 75 vs 70 on comfort.

Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2
Tire B · BFGoodrich Winter Slalom

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

g-Force Winter 2 or Winter Slalom?

Which is better in the wet, g-Force Winter 2 or Winter Slalom?

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2, 84 vs 74 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, g-Force Winter 2 or Winter Slalom?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 68 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, g-Force Winter 2 or Winter Slalom?

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2, 75 vs 70 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, g-Force Winter 2 or Winter Slalom?

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2, 73 vs 66 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology