Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 vs Vredestein Snowtrac 5 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 21 + 2 road tests and 30 + 8 owner reviews. How we score

g-Force Winter 2 is ahead, 80–67

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2
± 5

Tests 78 · 21 tests Owners 83 · 30 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 31 in 2023 Winter Tyre Test 54 Set Braking Test (snow braking)

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

Snowtrac 5

Winter

± 8

Tests 66 · 2 tests Owners 67 · 8 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 11 in 2018 AMS Winter Tyre Test (dry braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    Snowtrac 5 +2
    71
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Winter 2Snowtrac 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 2 tests6274
    Reviews found online8067

    g-Force Winter 2: 60% × 62 + 40% × 80.3 = 69

    Snowtrac 5: 60% × 73.8 + 40% × 66.7 = 71

  2. 87

    Wet

    g-Force Winter 2 +18
    69
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Winter 2Snowtrac 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 21 / 2 tests8667
    Reviews found online8973

    g-Force Winter 2: 60% × 86 + 40% × 88.6 = 87

    Snowtrac 5: 60% × 66.7 + 40% × 73 = 69

  3. 89

    Snow

    g-Force Winter 2 +21
    68
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Winter 2Snowtrac 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 21 / 2 tests9470
    Reviews found online8265

    g-Force Winter 2: 60% × 93.9 + 40% × 82.1 = 89

    Snowtrac 5: 60% × 70 + 40% × 65 = 68

  4. 78

    Comfort

    g-Force Winter 2 +9
    69
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Winter 2Snowtrac 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests67≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online8569

    g-Force Winter 2: 40% × 67 + 60% × 85.1 = 78

    Snowtrac 5: 40% × 68.8 (est.) + 60% × 68.8 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for Snowtrac 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 75

    Noise

    g-Force Winter 2 +13
    62
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Winter 2Snowtrac 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 2 tests8159
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)

    g-Force Winter 2: 60% × 81.3 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 75

    Snowtrac 5: 60% × 59.3 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 62

    No owner ratings of noise for g-Force Winter 2 or Snowtrac 5. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 76

    Treadwear

    g-Force Winter 2 +17
    59
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Winter 2Snowtrac 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / 1 tests7356
    Reviews found online8264

    g-Force Winter 2: 60% × 72.6 + 40% × 81.7 = 76

    Snowtrac 5: 60% × 55.7 + 40% × 64.3 = 59

  7. 85

    Handling (owners)

    g-Force Winter 2 +17
    68
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Winter 2Snowtrac 5
    Reviews found online8568
  8. 65

    Efficiency

    Snowtrac 5 +7
    72
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Winter 2Snowtrac 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 2 tests6572
Scores at a glance
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 vs Vredestein Snowtrac 5: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2Vredestein Snowtrac 5
Relative Score 80 67
Dry 69 71
Wet 87 69
Snow 89 68
Comfort 78 69
Noise 75 62
Treadwear 76 59
Handling (owners) 85 68
Efficiency 65 72

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

g-Force Winter 2

± 8

Snowtrac 5

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryg-Force Winter 2Snowtrac 5ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 94% #12/20 · 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 98% #3/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 97% #19/20 · 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 99% #4/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 98% #6/20 · 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 90% #14/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 86% #11/20 · 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 90% #19/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 95% #13/20 · 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 97% #14/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Snow Braking Snow 99% #3/20 · 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 97% #11/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Snow Handling Snow 99% #6/20 · 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 98% #11/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise Noise 98% #10/20 · 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 96% #16/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Wear Treadwear 95% #7/20 · 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 46% #19/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 97% #5/20 · 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 83% #9/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 64% #18/20 · 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 74% #15/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #14/20 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test #19/20 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Value Cost 69% #13/20 · 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 50% #19/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall #11/20 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test #8/16 2019 ADAC 185/65 R15 Winter Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A g-Force Winter 2

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and grip in deep snow and on ice
  • Strong performance in wet conditions with effective water evacuation
  • High value-for-money ratio compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Lack of on-center steering feel and responsiveness
  • Mediocre handling and grip during dry-road driving
  • Increased noise levels on certain road surfaces
All owner themes in the g-Force Winter 2 review

Tire B Snowtrac 5

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and handling in snow and ice
  • Strong wet weather performance and road adherence
  • Low road noise levels across various surface types

Cons

  • High price point noted by specific light vehicle owners
  • Limited long-term wearability data due to reviewers being new to the tires
All owner themes in the Snowtrac 5 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 B · Vredestein Snowtrac 5
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available7520
Rim diameters14″ – 20″13″ – 16″
Sizes in common1717

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

Winner: BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 — better snow, wet and treadwear. Pick the Vredestein Snowtrac 5 if efficiency matters most to you.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 scores 89 vs 68 on snow.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 scores 87 vs 69 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 scores 76 vs 59 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 scores 85 vs 68 on handling.

Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2
Tire B · Vredestein Snowtrac 5

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

g-Force Winter 2 or Snowtrac 5?

Which is better in the wet, g-Force Winter 2 or Snowtrac 5?

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2, 87 vs 69 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, g-Force Winter 2 or Snowtrac 5?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 71 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, g-Force Winter 2 or Snowtrac 5?

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2, 89 vs 68 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, g-Force Winter 2 or Snowtrac 5?

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2, 75 vs 62 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, g-Force Winter 2 or Snowtrac 5?

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2, 78 vs 69 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, g-Force Winter 2 or Snowtrac 5?

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2, 76 vs 59 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, g-Force Winter 2 or Snowtrac 5?

Vredestein Snowtrac 5, 72 vs 65 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology