Tests 67 · 4 tests Owners 75 · 131 reviews
Best test result: #3 of 20 in 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test (wear)
Head-to-head
Updated
BFGoodrich g-Grip vs Michelin Energy Saver — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 4 + 1 road tests and 131 + 137 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: g-Grip and Energy Saver are level at 70.
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 71 · 1 test Owners 69 · 137 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 20 in 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test (wear)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
Level69Why this score
Source g-Grip Energy Saver Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 1 tests 64 71 Reviews found online 76 67 Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 90% 92% Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 97% 98% g-Grip: 60% × 63.8 + 40% × 75.7 = 69
Energy Saver: 60% × 70.6 + 40% × 67.1 = 69
-
69
Wet
g-Grip +168Why this score
Source g-Grip Energy Saver Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 1 tests 66 69 Reviews found online 74 67 Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 94% 95% Wet Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 88% 89% Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 95% 95% g-Grip: 60% × 66.3 + 40% × 73.7 = 69
Energy Saver: 60% × 69.2 + 40% × 66.5 = 68
-
71
Comfort
g-Grip +368Why this score
Source g-Grip Energy Saver Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 73 67 g-Grip: 40% × 69.4 (est.) + 60% × 72.5 = 71
Energy Saver: 40% × 68.4 (est.) + 60% × 67.3 = 68
No road tests of comfort for g-Grip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Energy Saver. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
64
Noise
Energy Saver +670Why this score
Source g-Grip Energy Saver Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 1 tests 62 72 Reviews found online ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Noise (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 97% 99% g-Grip: 60% × 62.4 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 64
Energy Saver: 60% × 72.1 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 70
No owner ratings of noise for g-Grip or Energy Saver. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
74
Treadwear
Level74Why this score
Source g-Grip Energy Saver Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 73 74 Reviews found online 76 74 Wear (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 91% 95% g-Grip: 60% × 73.2 + 40% × 76 = 74
Energy Saver: 60% × 74.4 + 40% × 74.3 = 74
-
72
Handling (owners)
g-Grip +864Why this score
Source g-Grip Energy Saver Reviews found online 72 64 -
71
Efficiency
Energy Saver +475Why this score
Source g-Grip Energy Saver Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 71 75 Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 81% 88%
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich g-Grip | Michelin Energy Saver |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 70 |
| Dry | 69 | 69 |
| Wet | 69 | 68 |
| Comfort | 71 | 68 |
| Noise | 64 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 74 | 74 |
| Handling (owners) | 72 | 64 |
| Efficiency | 71 | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
70
/ 100
g-Grip
70
/ 100
Energy Saver
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 2 tests that ran both, BFGoodrich g-Grip finished ahead 1 times and Michelin Energy Saver 1 times.
| Discipline | Category | g-Grip | Energy Saver | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 90% | 92% | −1.9 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test · 195/65 R15 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 97% | 98% | −1.0 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test · 195/65 R15 |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 94% | 95% | −1.4 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test · 195/65 R15 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 88% | 89% | −0.9 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test · 195/65 R15 |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 95% | 95% | −0.6 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test · 195/65 R15 |
| Noise | Noise | 97% | 99% | −1.5 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test · 195/65 R15 |
| Wear | Treadwear | 91% | 95% | −4.7 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test · 195/65 R15 |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 81% | 88% | −6.7 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test · 195/65 R15 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 77% | 67% | +9.9 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test · 195/65 R15 |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Cost | #5/20 | #2/20 | – | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test · 195/65 R15 |
| Value | Cost | 75% | 69% | +6.3 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test · 195/65 R15 |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #15/20 | #5/20 | – | 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test · 195/65 R15 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A g-Grip
Pros
- Exceptional value for money compared to premium tier brands
- Strong, reliable dry grip and handling
- Smooth and comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Some increase in road noise as the tires age and wear down
- Softer sidewalls can reduce steering feedback or initial confidence
- Wet weather grip can feel inconsistent or require extra caution during aggressive cornering
Tire B Energy Saver
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and long-lasting durability
- Noticeable improvements in fuel economy and low rolling resistance
- Low road noise and high levels of driving comfort
Cons
- Subpar wet-weather grip and traction, especially as the tires age
- Prone to dry rotting, cracking, and hardening after a few years
- Poor performance and sliding in cold or winter conditions
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich g-Grip | B · Michelin Energy Saver |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 32 | 4 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 19″ | 15″ – 16″ |
| Sizes in common | 3 | 3 |
Which one should you actually buy?
70
/ 100
BFGoodrich g-Grip
70
/ 100
Michelin Energy Saver
Too close to call: BFGoodrich g-Grip and Michelin Energy Saver are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich g-Grip is stronger on handling and comfort. Michelin Energy Saver is stronger on noise and efficiency.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
BFGoodrich g-Grip scores 72 vs 64 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Michelin Energy Saver scores 70 vs 64 on noise.
Pick tire B
You want lower fuel or energy use
Michelin Energy Saver scores 75 vs 71 on efficiency.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
BFGoodrich g-Grip scores 71 vs 68 on comfort.
Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Grip
Tire B · Michelin Energy Saver
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
g-Grip or Energy Saver?
Which is better in the wet, g-Grip or Energy Saver?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 68 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, g-Grip or Energy Saver?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 69 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, g-Grip or Energy Saver?
Michelin Energy Saver, 70 vs 64 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, g-Grip or Energy Saver?
BFGoodrich g-Grip, 71 vs 68 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, g-Grip or Energy Saver?
Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 74 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
Which rolls more easily, g-Grip or Energy Saver?
Michelin Energy Saver, 75 vs 71 on our efficiency score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology