Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich g-Grip vs Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 4 + 0 road tests and 131 + 31 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: g-Grip 69, Advan Neova AD08 70.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

BFGoodrich g-Grip

g-Grip

Summer

Tests 67 · 4 tests Owners 72 · 131 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 20 in 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test (wear)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    Advan Neova AD08 +7
    75
    Why this score
    Sourceg-GripAdvan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests64≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online7480

    g-Grip: 60% × 63.9 + 40% × 74.3 = 68

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.7 = 75

    No road tests of dry for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 69

    Wet

    Level
    69
    Why this score
    Sourceg-GripAdvan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests66≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7269

    g-Grip: 60% × 66.3 + 40% × 72 = 69

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69

    No road tests of wet for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    65
    Why this score
    Sourceg-GripAdvan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–61

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 65

    No road tests of snow for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 71

    Comfort

    g-Grip +3
    68
    Why this score
    Sourceg-GripAdvan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7267

    g-Grip: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 72 = 71

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 68

    No road tests of comfort for g-Grip or Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 64

    Noise

    Advan Neova AD08 +3
    67
    Why this score
    Sourceg-GripAdvan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests62≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)68

    g-Grip: 60% × 62.4 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 64

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 67

    No owner ratings of noise for g-Grip. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

    No road tests of noise for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 72

    Treadwear

    g-Grip +9
    63
    Why this score
    Sourceg-GripAdvan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests73≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7261

    g-Grip: 60% × 72.6 + 40% × 71.6 = 72

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 63

    No road tests of treadwear for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 71

    Handling (owners)

    Advan Neova AD08 +8
    79
    Why this score
    Sourceg-GripAdvan Neova AD08
    Reviews found online7179
Scores at a glance
BFGoodrich g-Grip vs Yokohama Advan Neova AD08: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich g-GripYokohama Advan Neova AD08
Relative Score 69 70
Dry 68 75
Wet 69 69
Snow – 65
Comfort 71 68
Noise 64 67
Treadwear 72 63
Handling (owners) 71 79

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

g-Grip

Advan Neova AD08

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryg-GripAdvan Neova AD08ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #7/12 2020 Motor Summer Tire Test R15 #4/10 2014 EVO Max Performance Summer Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A g-Grip

Pros

  • Exceptional value for money compared to premium tier brands
  • Strong, reliable dry grip and handling
  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality

Cons

  • Some increase in road noise as the tires age and wear down
  • Softer sidewalls can reduce steering feedback or initial confidence
  • Wet weather grip can feel inconsistent or require extra caution during aggressive cornering
All owner themes in the g-Grip review

Tire B Advan Neova AD08

Pros

  • Phenomenal dry grip and cornering traction
  • Exceptional steering feedback and crisp response
  • Stiff, robust sidewall and carcass construction

Cons

  • Prone to overheating and rubber degradation/chunking during heavy track use
  • Reduced performance and aquaplaning tendencies in heavy standing water
  • Limited size availability for larger rims
All owner themes in the Advan Neova AD08 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich g-Grip B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available32—
Rim diameters14″ – 19″—
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG—180 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich g-Grip

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08

Too close to call: BFGoodrich g-Grip and Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich g-Grip is stronger on treadwear and comfort. Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 is stronger on handling, dry and noise.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

BFGoodrich g-Grip scores 72 vs 63 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 79 vs 71 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 75 vs 68 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

BFGoodrich g-Grip scores 71 vs 68 on comfort.

Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Grip
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

g-Grip or Advan Neova AD08?

Which is better in the wet, g-Grip or Advan Neova AD08?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 69 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, g-Grip or Advan Neova AD08?

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08, 75 vs 68 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, g-Grip or Advan Neova AD08?

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08, 67 vs 64 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, g-Grip or Advan Neova AD08?

BFGoodrich g-Grip, 71 vs 68 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, g-Grip or Advan Neova AD08?

BFGoodrich g-Grip, 72 vs 63 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology