tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 16 road tests and 122 + 22 owner reviews. How we score

Winter i cept evo3 is ahead, 78–71

Check price on Amazon · Winter i cept evo3 or Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Winter i cept evo3
Tire BHankook

Winter i cept evo3

Winter

± 4

Tests 76 · 16 tests Owners 82 · 22 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 71

    Dry

    Winter i cept evo3 +7
    78
    Why this score
    SourceMud-Terrain T/A KM3Winter i cept evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests≈ 70 (est.)76
    Reviews found online7382

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM3: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 71

    Winter i cept evo3: 60% × 75.8 + 40% × 82.3 = 78

    No road tests of dry for Mud-Terrain T/A KM3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 76

    Wet

    Winter i cept evo3 +14
    90
    Why this score
    SourceMud-Terrain T/A KM3Winter i cept evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 16 tests≈ 75 (est.)93
    Reviews found online7886

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM3: 60% × 74.7 (est.) + 40% × 77.8 = 76

    Winter i cept evo3: 60% × 92.6 + 40% × 86.4 = 90

    No road tests of wet for Mud-Terrain T/A KM3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 70

    Snow

    Winter i cept evo3 +10
    80
    Why this score
    SourceMud-Terrain T/A KM3Winter i cept evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 16 tests≈ 70 (est.)80
    Reviews found online6980

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM3: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.9 = 70

    Winter i cept evo3: 60% × 80 + 40% × 80.2 = 80

    No road tests of snow for Mud-Terrain T/A KM3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 69

    Comfort

    Winter i cept evo3 +3
    72
    Why this score
    SourceMud-Terrain T/A KM3Winter i cept evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 69 (est.)70
    Reviews found online6974

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM3: 40% × 69.1 (est.) + 60% × 69.2 = 69

    Winter i cept evo3: 40% × 70.2 + 60% × 73.9 = 72

    No road tests of comfort for Mud-Terrain T/A KM3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 66

    Noise

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 +33
    33
    Why this score
    SourceMud-Terrain T/A KM3Winter i cept evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests≈ 67 (est.)10
    Reviews found online66≈ 67 (est.)

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM3: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.1 = 66

    Winter i cept evo3: 60% × 10 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 33

    No road tests of noise for Mud-Terrain T/A KM3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

    No owner ratings of noise for Winter i cept evo3. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 69

    Treadwear

    Winter i cept evo3 +9
    78
    Why this score
    SourceMud-Terrain T/A KM3Winter i cept evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests≈ 68 (est.)77
    Reviews found online7281

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM3: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 71.5 = 69

    Winter i cept evo3: 60% × 76.9 + 40% × 80.7 = 78

    No road tests of treadwear for Mud-Terrain T/A KM3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    81
    Why this score
    SourceMud-Terrain T/A KM3Winter i cept evo3
    Reviews found online–81
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    67
    Why this score
    SourceMud-Terrain T/A KM3Winter i cept evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests–67
Scores at a glance
CategoryBFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3Hankook Winter i cept evo3
Relative Score 71 78
Dry 71 78
Wet 76 90
Snow 70 80
Comfort 69 72
Noise 66 33
Treadwear 69 78
Handling (owners) – 81
Efficiency – 67

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Mud-Terrain T/A KM3

± 4

Winter i cept evo3

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Mud-Terrain T/A KM3

Pros

  • Outstanding off-road and mud traction
  • Surprisingly quiet and comfortable on the highway for a mud-terrain tire
  • Impressive tread wear and longevity

Cons

  • Do not perform quite as well as dedicated road tires during on-road driving
All owner themes in the Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 review

Tire B Winter i cept evo3

Pros

  • Exceptional wet grip and outstanding aquaplaning resistance
  • Outstanding snow and ice traction providing high confidence in winter storms
  • Great value for money compared to Tier-1 brands like Michelin or Goodyear

Cons

  • Slightly increased noise levels or humming compared to summer tires
  • Mixed feedback on ride comfort, with some finding them stiffer
  • Longer braking distances reported by a few users in specific conditions
All owner themes in the Winter i cept evo3 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 B · Hankook Winter i cept evo3
CategoryMud-Terrain tireWinter
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available2786
Rim diameters16″ – 20″17″ – 22″
Tread depth18/32″—
SidewallRaised Black Lettering—
Max pressure45 - 80 psi—
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3

Hankook Winter i cept evo3

Winner: Hankook Winter i cept evo3 — better wet, snow and treadwear. Pick the BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 if noise matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 scores 66 vs 33 on noise.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Winter i cept evo3 scores 90 vs 76 on wet.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Hankook Winter i cept evo3 scores 80 vs 70 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Hankook Winter i cept evo3 scores 78 vs 69 on treadwear.

Tire A · BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Winter i cept evo3
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or Winter i cept evo3?

Which is better in the wet, Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or Winter i cept evo3?

Hankook Winter i cept evo3, 90 vs 76 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or Winter i cept evo3?

Hankook Winter i cept evo3, 78 vs 71 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or Winter i cept evo3?

Hankook Winter i cept evo3, 80 vs 70 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or Winter i cept evo3?

BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3, 66 vs 33 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or Winter i cept evo3?

Hankook Winter i cept evo3, 72 vs 69 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or Winter i cept evo3?

Hankook Winter i cept evo3, 78 vs 69 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology