BFGoodrich Winter Slalom looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich Winter Slalom vs Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 5 road tests and 3 + 5 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Winter Slalom and Winter i*pike RS2 are level at 70.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Winter i*pike RS2
Tire BHankook

Winter i*pike RS2

Winter

Tests 66 · 5 tests Owners 76 · 5 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2019 Studded Winter Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    Winter Slalom +9
    59
    Why this score
    SourceWinter SlalomWinter i*pike RS2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests≈ 68 (est.)49
    Reviews found online6874

    Winter Slalom: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 68

    Winter i*pike RS2: 60% × 49.4 + 40% × 73.8 = 59

    No road tests of dry for Winter Slalom. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 74

    Wet

    Level
    74
    Why this score
    SourceWinter SlalomWinter i*pike RS2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests≈ 73 (est.)71
    Reviews found online7578

    Winter Slalom: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.1 = 74

    Winter i*pike RS2: 60% × 70.9 + 40% × 78.2 = 74

    No road tests of wet for Winter Slalom. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    76
    Why this score
    SourceWinter SlalomWinter i*pike RS2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests–76
    Reviews found online–77

    Winter i*pike RS2: 60% × 75.7 + 40% × 77.1 = 76

  4. 70

    Comfort

    Winter i*pike RS2 +8
    78
    Why this score
    SourceWinter SlalomWinter i*pike RS2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 69 (est.)81
    Reviews found online7175

    Winter Slalom: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.1 = 70

    Winter i*pike RS2: 60% × 80.6 + 40% × 75.2 = 78

    No road tests of comfort for Winter Slalom. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    60
    Why this score
    SourceWinter SlalomWinter i*pike RS2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests–55
    Reviews found online–≈ 67 (est.)

    Winter i*pike RS2: 60% × 54.8 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 60

    No owner ratings of noise for Winter i*pike RS2. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    Winter i*pike RS2 +5
    71
    Why this score
    SourceWinter SlalomWinter i*pike RS2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6775

    Winter Slalom: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 66.8 = 66

    Winter i*pike RS2: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 71

    No road tests of treadwear for Winter Slalom. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Winter i*pike RS2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 67

    Handling (owners)

    Winter i*pike RS2 +12
    79
    Why this score
    SourceWinter SlalomWinter i*pike RS2
    Reviews found online6779
Scores at a glance
BFGoodrich Winter Slalom vs Hankook Winter i*pike RS2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich Winter SlalomHankook Winter i*pike RS2
Relative Score 70 70
Dry 68 59
Wet 74 74
Snow – 76
Comfort 70 78
Noise – 60
Treadwear 66 71
Handling (owners) 67 79

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Winter Slalom

Winter i*pike RS2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Winter Slalom

Pros

  • Strong traction in snow and wet conditions
  • Aggressive tread profile
  • Low road noise

Cons

  • Significant loss of grip as the tire ages
  • Performance degradation on wet surfaces after several years of use
All owner themes in the Winter Slalom review

Tire B Winter i*pike RS2

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and braking on snow and ice
  • Strong side grip and predictable cornering limits
  • High durability with secure stud retention over multiple years

Cons

  • Poor steering feedback on dry tarmac
  • Noticeable understeer in dry road conditions
All owner themes in the Winter i*pike RS2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich Winter Slalom B · Hankook Winter i*pike RS2
CategoryWinter Touring tiresWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich Winter Slalom

Hankook Winter i*pike RS2

Too close to call: BFGoodrich Winter Slalom and Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich Winter Slalom is stronger on dry. Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 is stronger on handling, comfort and treadwear. BFGoodrich Winter Slalom rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 3 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 scores 79 vs 67 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

BFGoodrich Winter Slalom scores 68 vs 59 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 scores 78 vs 70 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 scores 71 vs 66 on treadwear.

Tire A · BFGoodrich Winter Slalom
Tire B · Hankook Winter i*pike RS2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Winter Slalom or Winter i*pike RS2?

Which is better in the wet, Winter Slalom or Winter i*pike RS2?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 74 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Winter Slalom or Winter i*pike RS2?

BFGoodrich Winter Slalom, 68 vs 59 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Winter Slalom or Winter i*pike RS2?

Hankook Winter i*pike RS2, 78 vs 70 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Winter Slalom or Winter i*pike RS2?

Hankook Winter i*pike RS2, 71 vs 66 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology