Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 vs Michelin X Ice Snow — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 5 + 13 road tests and 5 + 19 owner reviews. How we score

X Ice Snow is ahead, 74–69

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Winter i*pike RS2
Tire AHankook

Winter i*pike RS2

Winter

± 6

Tests 66 · 5 tests Owners 73 · 5 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2019 Studded Winter Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

Michelin X Ice Snow
Tire BMichelin

X Ice Snow

Winter

± 5

Tests 70 · 13 tests Owners 79 · 19 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2025 Studded, Friction and European Winter Tyre Test (comfort (tester's mark))

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 56

    Dry

    X Ice Snow +12
    68
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i*pike RS2X Ice Snow
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 11 tests4965
    Reviews found online6772
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–191%93%

    Winter i*pike RS2: 60% × 49.4 + 40% × 66.5 = 56

    X Ice Snow: 60% × 65.3 + 40% × 72.2 = 68

  2. 73

    Wet

    Winter i*pike RS2 +2
    71
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i*pike RS2X Ice Snow
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 12 tests7164
    Reviews found online7681
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–084%79%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–096%95%

    Winter i*pike RS2: 60% × 70.9 + 40% × 75.9 = 73

    X Ice Snow: 60% × 64.2 + 40% × 80.6 = 71

  3. 76

    Snow

    X Ice Snow +1
    77
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i*pike RS2X Ice Snow
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 12 tests7673
    Reviews found online7782
    Ice Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–091%85%
    Ice Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–195%86%
    Ice Traction (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–091%70%
    Snow Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–199%98%
    Snow Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–298%98%
    Snow Traction (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–198%98%

    Winter i*pike RS2: 60% × 76 + 40% × 76.9 = 76

    X Ice Snow: 60% × 73.3 + 40% × 81.8 = 77

  4. 73

    Comfort

    X Ice Snow +8
    81
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i*pike RS2X Ice Snow
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 3 tests8182
    Reviews found online6880

    Winter i*pike RS2: 40% × 80.7 + 60% × 68.2 = 73

    X Ice Snow: 40% × 82.3 + 60% × 80 = 81

  5. 59

    Noise

    X Ice Snow +16
    75
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i*pike RS2X Ice Snow
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 8 tests5581
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Noise (tester's mark) (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–263%89%

    Winter i*pike RS2: 60% × 54.8 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 59

    X Ice Snow: 60% × 81.2 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 75

    No owner ratings of noise for Winter i*pike RS2 or X Ice Snow. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 71

    Treadwear

    X Ice Snow +6
    77
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i*pike RS2X Ice Snow
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online7583

    Winter i*pike RS2: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 71

    X Ice Snow: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 83.2 = 77

    No road tests of treadwear for Winter i*pike RS2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for X Ice Snow. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 73

    Handling (owners)

    X Ice Snow +3
    76
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i*pike RS2X Ice Snow
    Reviews found online7376
  8. 73

    Efficiency

    X Ice Snow +4
    77
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i*pike RS2X Ice Snow
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 6 tests7377
Scores at a glance
Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 vs Michelin X Ice Snow: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Winter i*pike RS2Michelin X Ice Snow
Relative Score 69 74
Dry 56 68
Wet 73 71
Snow 76 77
Comfort 73 81
Noise 59 75
Treadwear 71 77
Handling (owners) 73 76
Efficiency 73 77

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

Winter i*pike RS2

± 5

X Ice Snow

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 2 tests that ran both, Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 finished ahead 1 times and Michelin X Ice Snow 1 times.

DisciplineCategoryWinter i*pike RS2X Ice SnowΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 91% 93% −1.8 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2021 Studless and Studded Winter Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Wet Braking Wet 84% 79% +5.0 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2021 Studless and Studded Winter Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Wet Handling Wet 96% 95% +0.7 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2021 Studless and Studded Winter Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Ice Braking Snow 91% 85% +5.4 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2021 Studless and Studded Winter Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Ice Handling Snow 95% 86% +8.8 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2021 Studless and Studded Winter Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Ice Traction Snow 91% 70% +21.8 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2021 Studless and Studded Winter Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Snow Braking Snow 99% 98% +1.2 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2021 Studless and Studded Winter Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Snow Handling Snow 98% 98% −0.7 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2021 Studless and Studded Winter Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Snow Traction Snow 98% 98% 0.0 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2021 Studless and Studded Winter Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Noise (tester's mark) Noise 63% 89% −26.1 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2021 Studless and Studded Winter Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 67% 50% +16.7 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Studless and Studded Winter Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Overall Ranking Overall #13/16 #8/16 – 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2021 Studless and Studded Winter Tyre Test · 205/55 R16

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Winter i*pike RS2

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and braking on snow and ice
  • Strong side grip and predictable cornering limits
  • High durability with secure stud retention over multiple years

Cons

  • Poor steering feedback on dry tarmac
  • Noticeable understeer in dry road conditions
All owner themes in the Winter i*pike RS2 review

Tire B X Ice Snow

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and lateral grip in deep snow and slush
  • High level of confidence and stability on icy surfaces
  • Excellent tread life and durability over multiple seasons

Cons

  • Average performance and handling on dry or wet pavement
  • Increased road noise as the tires wear over time
  • Can feel slightly 'twitchy' or less stable at the absolute limit of handling
All owner themes in the X Ice Snow review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 B · Michelin X Ice Snow
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—100
Rim diameters—13″ – 21″

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Winter i*pike RS2

Michelin X Ice Snow

Winner: Michelin X Ice Snow — better noise, dry and comfort. Where the Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Michelin X Ice Snow scores 75 vs 59 on noise.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin X Ice Snow scores 68 vs 56 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin X Ice Snow scores 81 vs 73 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin X Ice Snow scores 77 vs 71 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet braking

Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 won 2 of 2 shared wet braking tests.

Tire A · Hankook Winter i*pike RS2
Tire B · Michelin X Ice Snow

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Winter i*pike RS2 or X Ice Snow?

Which is better in the wet, Winter i*pike RS2 or X Ice Snow?

Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 71 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Winter i*pike RS2 or X Ice Snow?

Michelin X Ice Snow, 68 vs 56 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Winter i*pike RS2 or X Ice Snow?

Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 77 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, Winter i*pike RS2 or X Ice Snow?

Michelin X Ice Snow, 75 vs 59 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Winter i*pike RS2 or X Ice Snow?

Michelin X Ice Snow, 81 vs 73 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Winter i*pike RS2 or X Ice Snow?

Michelin X Ice Snow, 77 vs 71 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Winter i*pike RS2 or X Ice Snow?

Michelin X Ice Snow, 77 vs 73 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology