Falken ZE912 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002 vs Falken ZE912 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 108 + 200 owner reviews. How we score

Adrenalin RE002 is ahead, 74–66

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken ZE912
Tire BFalken

ZE912

Summer

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 200 reviews

“Quote: Originally Posted by BobDogNdaHouse I just ordered some 912's (215/45) so I will give a review in a few weeks. I got them for $76 ea, but have seen them for $68, cant beat the price Thats a great price!!! What store did you see 215/45/17 for $68?”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 76

    Dry

    Adrenalin RE002 +10
    66
    Why this score
    SourceAdrenalin RE002ZE912
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online8066

    Adrenalin RE002: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 80.3 = 76

    ZE912: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 65.5 = 66

    No road tests of dry for Adrenalin RE002. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for ZE912. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 76

    Wet

    Adrenalin RE002 +7
    69
    Why this score
    SourceAdrenalin RE002ZE912
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 75 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7868

    Adrenalin RE002: 60% × 75 (est.) + 40% × 78.4 = 76

    ZE912: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 67.7 = 69

    No road tests of wet for Adrenalin RE002. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for ZE912. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 70

    Comfort

    Adrenalin RE002 +3
    67
    Why this score
    SourceAdrenalin RE002ZE912
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7066

    Adrenalin RE002: 40% × 69.3 (est.) + 60% × 70.2 = 70

    ZE912: 40% × 68.6 (est.) + 60% × 66.2 = 67

    No road tests of comfort for Adrenalin RE002 or ZE912. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 68

    Treadwear

    Adrenalin RE002 +6
    62
    Why this score
    SourceAdrenalin RE002ZE912
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6859

    Adrenalin RE002: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 68

    ZE912: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 58.7 = 62

    No road tests of treadwear for Adrenalin RE002. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for ZE912. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  5. 76

    Handling (owners)

    Adrenalin RE002 +14
    62
    Why this score
    SourceAdrenalin RE002ZE912
    Reviews found online7662
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002 vs Falken ZE912: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Adrenalin RE002Falken ZE912
Relative Score 74 66
Dry 76 66
Wet 76 69
Comfort 70 67
Treadwear 68 62
Handling (owners) 76 62

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Adrenalin RE002

± 8

ZE912

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryAdrenalin RE002ZE912ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #9/10 2015 EVO Magazine Performance Tyre Test #13/14 2011 European Summer Tyre Test - 195/65 R15 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Adrenalin RE002

Pros

  • Exceptional dry pavement grip and cornering stability
  • High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
  • Predictable and progressive handling characteristics

Cons

  • Performance can be inconsistent until the tire reaches optimal operating temperature
  • Reports of increased road noise on certain asphalt surfaces
  • Mixed feedback regarding wet-weather performance, with some users noting hydroplaning susceptibility
All owner themes in the Adrenalin RE002 review

Tire B ZE912

Pros

  • Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
  • Low road noise and high ride comfort
  • Strong dry-weather grip and predictable handling

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread life, with many reports of premature wear
  • Soft sidewalls can lead to a 'squishy' feel or lack of steering precision
  • Wet-weather performance is frequently described as unpredictable or lacking at the limit
All owner themes in the ZE912 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Falken ZE912

Mixed

Community consensus on the Falken Ziex ZE912 highlights it as an affordable, comfortable, and relatively quiet all-season tire with decent dry and predictable wet traction. However, users frequently criticize its rapid treadwear, poor winter/snow grip, tendency to develop road noise over time, and softer sidewalls compared to dedicated performance summer tires.

Top themes
#affordable pricing and value#quiet and comfortable ride#poor snow and winter performance#noise level over time#treadwear and longevity#sidewall stiffness and handling#wet road traction

Based on 50 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002 B · Falken ZE912
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002

Falken ZE912

Winner: Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002 scores 76 vs 62 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002 scores 76 vs 66 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002 scores 76 vs 69 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002 scores 68 vs 62 on treadwear.

Tire A · Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002
Tire B · Falken ZE912

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Adrenalin RE002 or ZE912?

Which is better in the wet, Adrenalin RE002 or ZE912?

Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002, 76 vs 69 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Adrenalin RE002 or ZE912?

Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002, 76 vs 66 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Adrenalin RE002 or ZE912?

Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002, 70 vs 67 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Adrenalin RE002 or ZE912?

Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002, 68 vs 62 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology