Tests – · none yet Owners 75 · 108 reviews
Falken ZE912 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002 vs Falken ZE912 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 108 + 200 owner reviews. How we score
Adrenalin RE002 is ahead, 74–66
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 200 reviews
“Quote: Originally Posted by BobDogNdaHouse I just ordered some 912's (215/45) so I will give a review in a few weeks. I got them for $76 ea, but have seen them for $68, cant beat the price Thats a great price!!! What store did you see 215/45/17 for $68?”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
76
Dry
Adrenalin RE002 +1066Why this score
Source Adrenalin RE002 ZE912 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 80 66 Adrenalin RE002: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 80.3 = 76
ZE912: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 65.5 = 66
No road tests of dry for Adrenalin RE002. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for ZE912. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
76
Wet
Adrenalin RE002 +769Why this score
Source Adrenalin RE002 ZE912 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 75 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 78 68 Adrenalin RE002: 60% × 75 (est.) + 40% × 78.4 = 76
ZE912: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 67.7 = 69
No road tests of wet for Adrenalin RE002. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for ZE912. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
70
Comfort
Adrenalin RE002 +367Why this score
Source Adrenalin RE002 ZE912 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 70 66 Adrenalin RE002: 40% × 69.3 (est.) + 60% × 70.2 = 70
ZE912: 40% × 68.6 (est.) + 60% × 66.2 = 67
No road tests of comfort for Adrenalin RE002 or ZE912. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Treadwear
Adrenalin RE002 +662Why this score
Source Adrenalin RE002 ZE912 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 68 59 Adrenalin RE002: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 68
ZE912: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 58.7 = 62
No road tests of treadwear for Adrenalin RE002. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for ZE912. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
76
Handling (owners)
Adrenalin RE002 +1462Why this score
Source Adrenalin RE002 ZE912 Reviews found online 76 62
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002 | Falken ZE912 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 74 | 66 |
| Dry | 76 | 66 |
| Wet | 76 | 69 |
| Comfort | 70 | 67 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 62 |
| Handling (owners) | 76 | 62 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Adrenalin RE002
ZE912
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Adrenalin RE002 | ZE912 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #9/10 2015 EVO Magazine Performance Tyre Test | #13/14 2011 European Summer Tyre Test - 195/65 R15 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Adrenalin RE002
Pros
- Exceptional dry pavement grip and cornering stability
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
- Predictable and progressive handling characteristics
Cons
- Performance can be inconsistent until the tire reaches optimal operating temperature
- Reports of increased road noise on certain asphalt surfaces
- Mixed feedback regarding wet-weather performance, with some users noting hydroplaning susceptibility
Tire B ZE912
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
- Low road noise and high ride comfort
- Strong dry-weather grip and predictable handling
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life, with many reports of premature wear
- Soft sidewalls can lead to a 'squishy' feel or lack of steering precision
- Wet-weather performance is frequently described as unpredictable or lacking at the limit
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Falken ZE912
Community consensus on the Falken Ziex ZE912 highlights it as an affordable, comfortable, and relatively quiet all-season tire with decent dry and predictable wet traction. However, users frequently criticize its rapid treadwear, poor winter/snow grip, tendency to develop road noise over time, and softer sidewalls compared to dedicated performance summer tires.
“Well i can confirm that the sidewall is stiffer. The Ziex 512 was used a lot by the Euro car crowd to achieve the stretched tire look due to it's nice super soft sidewall. People have all been reporting that the new 912's don't stretch nearly as well and it's due to a stiffer sidewall.”
“I paid $90/tire at Sears, which had them in stock. I had the local Discount Tire store install them, which they did for free, since they couldn't get the tire in time for my road trip (let's just say that I'm a frequent DT customer, thanks in part to the ar eating tires).”
“the tires ride AWESOME, they are very quiet, comfortable, and handle quite nicely, but the only thing i dont like is the softer sidewalls, the steering response is delayed compared to the yokos, and the car kind of oversteers now... gay, but not enough to really notice unless your focusing on it, but they heat up quickly, and handle nice around turns, but now i feel like i need sway bars...”
Based on 50 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002 | B · Falken ZE912 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002
Falken ZE912
Winner: Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002 scores 76 vs 62 on handling.
Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002 scores 76 vs 66 on dry.
Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002 scores 76 vs 69 on wet.
Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002 scores 68 vs 62 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Adrenalin RE002 or ZE912?
Which is better in the wet, Adrenalin RE002 or ZE912?
Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002, 76 vs 69 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Adrenalin RE002 or ZE912?
Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002, 76 vs 66 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Adrenalin RE002 or ZE912?
Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002, 70 vs 67 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Adrenalin RE002 or ZE912?
Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002, 68 vs 62 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology