Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra vs Hankook Dynapro AT2 (RF11) — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 13 + 19 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Alenza AS Ultra 66, Dynapro AT2 (RF11) 65.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Dynapro AT2 (RF11)
Tire BHankook

Dynapro AT2 (RF11)

All-Terrain tire

± 8Provisional

Tests – · 1 test Owners 63 · 19 reviews

Best test result: #5 of 18 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Terrain Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    Alenza AS Ultra +1
    65
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza AS UltraDynapro AT2 (RF11)
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6564

    Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 66

    Dynapro AT2 (RF11): 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 65

    No road tests of dry for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro AT2 (RF11). The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 70

    Wet

    Alenza AS Ultra +5
    65
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza AS UltraDynapro AT2 (RF11)
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6962

    Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 69.2 = 70

    Dynapro AT2 (RF11): 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 62.3 = 65

    No road tests of wet for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro AT2 (RF11). The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 70

    Snow

    Alenza AS Ultra +7
    63
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza AS UltraDynapro AT2 (RF11)
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6959

    Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 69.4 = 70

    Dynapro AT2 (RF11): 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 58.8 = 63

    No road tests of snow for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro AT2 (RF11). The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 65

    Comfort

    Alenza AS Ultra +6
    59
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza AS UltraDynapro AT2 (RF11)
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6354

    Alenza AS Ultra: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 62.9 = 65

    Dynapro AT2 (RF11): 40% × 66.3 (est.) + 60% × 53.7 = 59

    No road tests of comfort for Alenza AS Ultra or Dynapro AT2 (RF11). The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 63

    Noise

    Dynapro AT2 (RF11) +3
    66
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza AS UltraDynapro AT2 (RF11)
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5765

    Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 56.5 = 63

    Dynapro AT2 (RF11): 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.8 = 66

    No road tests of noise for Alenza AS Ultra or Dynapro AT2 (RF11). The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 54

    Treadwear

    Dynapro AT2 (RF11) +16
    70
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza AS UltraDynapro AT2 (RF11)
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 59 (est.)71
    Reviews found online4668

    Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 59.2 (est.) + 40% × 46.3 = 54

    Dynapro AT2 (RF11): 60% × 71.1 + 40% × 67.7 = 70

    No road tests of treadwear for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 63

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza AS UltraDynapro AT2 (RF11)
    Reviews found online63–
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra vs Hankook Dynapro AT2 (RF11): scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Alenza AS UltraHankook Dynapro AT2 (RF11)
Relative Score 66 65
Dry 66 65
Wet 70 65
Snow 70 63
Comfort 65 59
Noise 63 66
Treadwear 54 70
Handling (owners) 63 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Alenza AS Ultra

± 8

Dynapro AT2 (RF11)

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Alenza AS Ultra

Pros

  • Strong traction on both wet and dry road surfaces
  • Improved ride comfort and handling compared to some factory-installed alternatives
  • Capable performance in varied weather conditions for some users

Cons

  • Reports of premature tread wear and short service life
  • Noticeable road noise compared to other premium tires
  • Inconsistent performance in severe winter conditions, particularly on ice and deep snow
All owner themes in the Alenza AS Ultra review

Tire B Dynapro AT2 (RF11)

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra B · Hankook Dynapro AT2 (RF11)
CategoryAll SeasonAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available4646
Rim diameters16″ – 22″15″ – 22″
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG800 A A—
Treadwear warranty80,000 mi60,000 mi
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure44 psi—
Sizes in common1313

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra

Hankook Dynapro AT2 (RF11)

Too close to call: Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra and Hankook Dynapro AT2 (RF11) are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra is stronger on snow, comfort and wet. Hankook Dynapro AT2 (RF11) is stronger on treadwear and noise. Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 13 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Hankook Dynapro AT2 (RF11) rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 19 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Hankook Dynapro AT2 (RF11) scores 70 vs 54 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 70 vs 63 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 65 vs 59 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 70 vs 65 on wet.

Tire A · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro AT2 (RF11)

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Alenza AS Ultra or Dynapro AT2 (RF11)?

Which is better in the wet, Alenza AS Ultra or Dynapro AT2 (RF11)?

Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra, 70 vs 65 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Alenza AS Ultra or Dynapro AT2 (RF11)?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 65 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Alenza AS Ultra or Dynapro AT2 (RF11)?

Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra, 70 vs 63 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Alenza AS Ultra or Dynapro AT2 (RF11)?

Hankook Dynapro AT2 (RF11), 66 vs 63 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Alenza AS Ultra or Dynapro AT2 (RF11)?

Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra, 65 vs 59 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Alenza AS Ultra or Dynapro AT2 (RF11)?

Hankook Dynapro AT2 (RF11), 70 vs 54 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology