Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 13 reviews
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra vs Hankook Dynapro AT2 (RF11) — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 13 + 19 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Alenza AS Ultra 66, Dynapro AT2 (RF11) 65.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 63 · 19 reviews
Best test result: #5 of 18 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Terrain Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
Alenza AS Ultra +165Why this score
Source Alenza AS Ultra Dynapro AT2 (RF11) Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 65 64 Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 66
Dynapro AT2 (RF11): 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 65
No road tests of dry for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Dynapro AT2 (RF11). The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
70
Wet
Alenza AS Ultra +565Why this score
Source Alenza AS Ultra Dynapro AT2 (RF11) Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 69 62 Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 69.2 = 70
Dynapro AT2 (RF11): 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 62.3 = 65
No road tests of wet for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Dynapro AT2 (RF11). The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
70
Snow
Alenza AS Ultra +763Why this score
Source Alenza AS Ultra Dynapro AT2 (RF11) Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 69 59 Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 69.4 = 70
Dynapro AT2 (RF11): 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 58.8 = 63
No road tests of snow for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for Dynapro AT2 (RF11). The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
65
Comfort
Alenza AS Ultra +659Why this score
Source Alenza AS Ultra Dynapro AT2 (RF11) Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 63 54 Alenza AS Ultra: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 62.9 = 65
Dynapro AT2 (RF11): 40% × 66.3 (est.) + 60% × 53.7 = 59
No road tests of comfort for Alenza AS Ultra or Dynapro AT2 (RF11). The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
63
Noise
Dynapro AT2 (RF11) +366Why this score
Source Alenza AS Ultra Dynapro AT2 (RF11) Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 57 65 Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 56.5 = 63
Dynapro AT2 (RF11): 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.8 = 66
No road tests of noise for Alenza AS Ultra or Dynapro AT2 (RF11). The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
54
Treadwear
Dynapro AT2 (RF11) +1670Why this score
Source Alenza AS Ultra Dynapro AT2 (RF11) Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 59 (est.) 71 Reviews found online 46 68 Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 59.2 (est.) + 40% × 46.3 = 54
Dynapro AT2 (RF11): 60% × 71.1 + 40% × 67.7 = 70
No road tests of treadwear for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
63
Handling (owners)
No comparison–Why this score
Source Alenza AS Ultra Dynapro AT2 (RF11) Reviews found online 63 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra | Hankook Dynapro AT2 (RF11) |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 65 |
| Dry | 66 | 65 |
| Wet | 70 | 65 |
| Snow | 70 | 63 |
| Comfort | 65 | 59 |
| Noise | 63 | 66 |
| Treadwear | 54 | 70 |
| Handling (owners) | 63 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Alenza AS Ultra
Dynapro AT2 (RF11)
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Alenza AS Ultra
Pros
- Strong traction on both wet and dry road surfaces
- Improved ride comfort and handling compared to some factory-installed alternatives
- Capable performance in varied weather conditions for some users
Cons
- Reports of premature tread wear and short service life
- Noticeable road noise compared to other premium tires
- Inconsistent performance in severe winter conditions, particularly on ice and deep snow
Tire B Dynapro AT2 (RF11)
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra | B · Hankook Dynapro AT2 (RF11) |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 46 | 46 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 800 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 80,000 mi | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 13 | 13 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra
Hankook Dynapro AT2 (RF11)
Too close to call: Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra and Hankook Dynapro AT2 (RF11) are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra is stronger on snow, comfort and wet. Hankook Dynapro AT2 (RF11) is stronger on treadwear and noise. Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 13 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Hankook Dynapro AT2 (RF11) rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 19 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Hankook Dynapro AT2 (RF11) scores 70 vs 54 on treadwear.
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 70 vs 63 on snow.
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 65 vs 59 on comfort.
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 70 vs 65 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Alenza AS Ultra or Dynapro AT2 (RF11)?
Which is better in the wet, Alenza AS Ultra or Dynapro AT2 (RF11)?
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra, 70 vs 65 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Alenza AS Ultra or Dynapro AT2 (RF11)?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 65 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, Alenza AS Ultra or Dynapro AT2 (RF11)?
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra, 70 vs 63 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Alenza AS Ultra or Dynapro AT2 (RF11)?
Hankook Dynapro AT2 (RF11), 66 vs 63 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Alenza AS Ultra or Dynapro AT2 (RF11)?
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra, 65 vs 59 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Alenza AS Ultra or Dynapro AT2 (RF11)?
Hankook Dynapro AT2 (RF11), 70 vs 54 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology