Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 13 reviews
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra vs Kumho Sense KR26 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 13 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
Alenza AS Ultra is ahead, 69–47
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 37 · 11 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
Alenza AS Ultra +2347Why this score
Source Alenza AS Ultra Sense KR26 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 55 (est.) Reviews found online 72 35 Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 71.5 = 70
Sense KR26: 60% × 54.6 (est.) + 40% × 35 = 47
No road tests of dry for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Sense KR26. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
72
Wet
Alenza AS Ultra +3240Why this score
Source Alenza AS Ultra Sense KR26 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 47 (est.) Reviews found online 73 29 Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 72.7 = 72
Sense KR26: 60% × 46.8 (est.) + 40% × 28.8 = 40
No road tests of wet for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Sense KR26. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
70
Snow
Alenza AS Ultra +2842Why this score
Source Alenza AS Ultra Sense KR26 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 55 (est.) Reviews found online 71 24 Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 70
Sense KR26: 60% × 54.7 (est.) + 40% × 24 = 42
No road tests of snow for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Sense KR26. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
69
Comfort
Alenza AS Ultra +1554Why this score
Source Alenza AS Ultra Sense KR26 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 68 40 Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 69
Sense KR26: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 39.8 = 54
No road tests of comfort for Alenza AS Ultra or Sense KR26. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Noise
Alenza AS Ultra +560Why this score
Source Alenza AS Ultra Sense KR26 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 61 48 Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 65
Sense KR26: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 47.9 = 60
No road tests of noise for Alenza AS Ultra or Sense KR26. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
62
Treadwear
Alenza AS Ultra +854Why this score
Source Alenza AS Ultra Sense KR26 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 59 46 Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 58.7 = 62
Sense KR26: 60% × 59.6 (est.) + 40% × 45.9 = 54
No road tests of treadwear for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Sense KR26. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
69
Handling (owners)
Alenza AS Ultra +2346Why this score
Source Alenza AS Ultra Sense KR26 Reviews found online 69 46
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra | Kumho Sense KR26 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 47 |
| Dry | 70 | 47 |
| Wet | 72 | 40 |
| Snow | 70 | 42 |
| Comfort | 69 | 54 |
| Noise | 65 | 60 |
| Treadwear | 62 | 54 |
| Handling (owners) | 69 | 46 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Alenza AS Ultra
Sense KR26
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Alenza AS Ultra
Pros
- Strong traction on both wet and dry road surfaces
- Improved ride comfort and handling compared to some factory-installed alternatives
- Capable performance in varied weather conditions for some users
Cons
- Reports of premature tread wear and short service life
- Noticeable road noise compared to other premium tires
- Inconsistent performance in severe winter conditions, particularly on ice and deep snow
Tire B Sense KR26
Pros
- Affordable price point appealing to budget-conscious drivers
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Smooth and pleasant driving dynamics when new
Cons
- Rapid degradation of wet-weather traction after 15,000 to 25,000 miles
- Uneven tread wear and balancing issues at higher mileage
- Poor dry and wet grip reported by some users as the tires age
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra | B · Kumho Sense KR26 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 46 | 17 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | 13″ – 17″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 9.5/32″ |
| UTQG | 800 A A | 460 A B |
| Treadwear warranty | 80,000 mi | 40,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 44 psi |
| Sizes in common | 1 | 1 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra
Kumho Sense KR26
Winner: Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra — better wet, snow and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 13 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Kumho Sense KR26 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 72 vs 40 on wet.
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 70 vs 42 on snow.
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 70 vs 47 on dry.
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 69 vs 46 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Alenza AS Ultra or Sense KR26?
Which is better in the wet, Alenza AS Ultra or Sense KR26?
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra, 72 vs 40 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Alenza AS Ultra or Sense KR26?
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra, 70 vs 47 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Alenza AS Ultra or Sense KR26?
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra, 70 vs 42 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Alenza AS Ultra or Sense KR26?
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra, 65 vs 60 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Alenza AS Ultra or Sense KR26?
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra, 69 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Alenza AS Ultra or Sense KR26?
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra, 62 vs 54 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology