Michelin Defender looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra vs Michelin Defender — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 13 + 4 owner reviews. How we score

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Defender
Tire BMichelin

Defender

Summer Premium Touring tires

Tests – · none yet Owners – · 4 reviews (needs 5)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza AS UltraDefender
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online65–

    Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 66

    No road tests of dry for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 69

    Wet

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza AS UltraDefender
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)–
    Reviews found online69–

    Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 68.9 = 69

    No road tests of wet for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 69

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza AS UltraDefender
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)–
    Reviews found online69–

    Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 69

    No road tests of snow for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 64

    Comfort

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza AS UltraDefender
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online62–

    Alenza AS Ultra: 40% × 67.4 (est.) + 60% × 62.1 = 64

    No road tests of comfort for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).

  5. 62

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza AS UltraDefender
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online56–

    Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 55.8 = 62

    No road tests of noise for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 54

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza AS UltraDefender
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)–
    Reviews found online46–

    Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 59.3 (est.) + 40% × 46.4 = 54

    No road tests of treadwear for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 63

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza AS UltraDefender
    Reviews found online63–
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra vs Michelin Defender: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Alenza AS UltraMichelin Defender
Relative Score 65 –
Dry 66 –
Wet 69 –
Snow 69 –
Comfort 64 –
Noise 62 –
Treadwear 54 –
Handling (owners) 63 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Alenza AS Ultra

Defender

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Alenza AS Ultra

Pros

  • Strong traction on both wet and dry road surfaces
  • Improved ride comfort and handling compared to some factory-installed alternatives
  • Capable performance in varied weather conditions for some users

Cons

  • Reports of premature tread wear and short service life
  • Noticeable road noise compared to other premium tires
  • Inconsistent performance in severe winter conditions, particularly on ice and deep snow
All owner themes in the Alenza AS Ultra review

Tire B Defender

Pros

  • Excellent ride comfort and quiet operation
  • Strong tread life and durability over several years
  • Reliable grip on dry pavement

Cons

  • Susceptibility to hydroplaning in heavy rain
  • Limited traction in deep or severe snow
  • Audible squealing during aggressive dry-pavement acceleration
All owner themes in the Defender review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra B · Michelin Defender
CategoryAll SeasonSummer Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available46—
Rim diameters16″ – 22″—
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG800 A A—
Treadwear warranty80,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure44 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra

Michelin Defender

Only Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra
Tire B · Michelin Defender

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology