Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 13 reviews
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra vs Yokohama A.Drive — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 13 + 28 owner reviews. How we score
Alenza AS Ultra is ahead, 69–62
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
Alenza AS Ultra +961Why this score
Source Alenza AS Ultra A.Drive Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 72 58 Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 71.5 = 70
A.Drive: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 57.7 = 61
No road tests of dry for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for A.Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
72
Wet
Alenza AS Ultra +1062Why this score
Source Alenza AS Ultra A.Drive Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 73 59 Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 72.7 = 72
A.Drive: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 58.6 = 62
No road tests of wet for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for A.Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
70
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Alenza AS Ultra A.Drive Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) – Reviews found online 71 – Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 70
No road tests of snow for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
69
Comfort
Alenza AS Ultra +564Why this score
Source Alenza AS Ultra A.Drive Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 68 58 Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 69
A.Drive: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 58.2 = 64
No road tests of comfort for Alenza AS Ultra or A.Drive. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Alenza AS Ultra A.Drive Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 61 – Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 65
No road tests of noise for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
62
Treadwear
A.Drive +365Why this score
Source Alenza AS Ultra A.Drive Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 59 64 Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 58.7 = 62
A.Drive: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for A.Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
69
Handling (owners)
Alenza AS Ultra +1059Why this score
Source Alenza AS Ultra A.Drive Reviews found online 69 59
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra | Yokohama A.Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 62 |
| Dry | 70 | 61 |
| Wet | 72 | 62 |
| Snow | 70 | – |
| Comfort | 69 | 64 |
| Noise | 65 | – |
| Treadwear | 62 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 69 | 59 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Alenza AS Ultra
A.Drive
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Alenza AS Ultra
Pros
- Strong traction on both wet and dry road surfaces
- Improved ride comfort and handling compared to some factory-installed alternatives
- Capable performance in varied weather conditions for some users
Cons
- Reports of premature tread wear and short service life
- Noticeable road noise compared to other premium tires
- Inconsistent performance in severe winter conditions, particularly on ice and deep snow
Tire B A.Drive
Pros
- Competitive price point offering good value for money
- Reliable and predictable grip in dry road conditions
- Solid durability and tread life for many users
Cons
- Significant issues with wet-weather traction and aquaplaning
- High levels of road noise, particularly at highway speeds
- Inconsistent tread wear performance across different driving styles
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra | B · Yokohama A.Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 46 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 800 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 80,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra
Yokohama A.Drive
Winner: Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra — better wet, handling and dry. Pick the Yokohama A.Drive if treadwear matters most to you. Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 13 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 72 vs 62 on wet.
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 69 vs 59 on handling.
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 70 vs 61 on dry.
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 69 vs 64 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Alenza AS Ultra or A.Drive?
Which is better in the wet, Alenza AS Ultra or A.Drive?
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra, 72 vs 62 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Alenza AS Ultra or A.Drive?
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra, 70 vs 61 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Alenza AS Ultra or A.Drive?
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra, 69 vs 64 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Alenza AS Ultra or A.Drive?
Yokohama A.Drive, 65 vs 62 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology