Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 9 reviews
Bridgestone Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport vs Michelin Power 5 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 9 + 16 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport 70, Power 5 71.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
71
Dry
Level71Why this score
Source Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport Power 5 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 72 73 Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 72.1 = 71
Power 5: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 71
No road tests of dry for Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Power 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
71
Wet
Power 5 +374Why this score
Source Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport Power 5 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 72 75 Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport: 60% × 71.2 (est.) + 40% × 71.6 = 71
Power 5: 60% × 72.9 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 74
No road tests of wet for Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Power 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
71
Comfort
Level71Why this score
Source Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport Power 5 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 73 72 Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 72.7 = 71
Power 5: 40% × 69.3 (est.) + 60% × 71.7 = 71
No road tests of comfort for Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Power 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
64
Treadwear
Level64Why this score
Source Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport Power 5 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 62 62 Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport: 60% × 64.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.8 = 64
Power 5: 60% × 64.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.8 = 64
No road tests of treadwear for Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Power 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
74
Handling (owners)
Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport +173Why this score
Source Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport Power 5 Reviews found online 74 73
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport | Michelin Power 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 71 |
| Dry | 71 | 71 |
| Wet | 71 | 74 |
| Comfort | 71 | 71 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 64 |
| Handling (owners) | 74 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport
Power 5
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport
Pros
- Excellent confidence and stability in varied road conditions
- Strong performance in both wet and dry weather
- Effective absorption of road bumps and irregularities
Cons
- Lack of feedback and feel at higher lean angles
- Tendency to square off during long-distance or motorway riding
- Performance limits are reached quickly during aggressive, high-speed riding
Tire B Power 5
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather grip and stability in standing water
- Rapid warm-up times, even in cooler ambient temperatures
- Agile handling and predictable cornering behavior on public roads
Cons
- Tendency for the rear tire to square off prematurely
- Inconsistent performance and grip degradation as the tire reaches the end of its life
- Lack of confidence at maximum lean angles compared to dedicated track tires
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport | B · Michelin Power 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport
Michelin Power 5
Too close to call: Bridgestone Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport and Michelin Power 5 are within 2 points overall. Michelin Power 5 is stronger on wet. Bridgestone Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Michelin Power 5 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Power 5 scores 74 vs 71 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport or Power 5?
Which is better in the wet, Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport or Power 5?
Michelin Power 5, 74 vs 71 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport or Power 5?
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 71 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport or Power 5?
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 71 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport or Power 5?
Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 64 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology